Posted on 11/28/2018 4:36:47 PM PST by Petrosius
DALLAS, Texas, November 28, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) A six-year-old Texas boy is being dressed and presented as a girl by his mother; at the same time, she is threatening the boys father legally for not going along with her plan for their son to live as a girl.
James lives as a girl when with his mother, but when with his father and given the choice, the six-year-old boy lives as a boy.
Jeffrey Younger is currently prohibited by court order from affirming in any way his sons sex, including imparting Christian teaching on gender and sexuality to James.
In addition to the medical and psychological risks to children associated with so-called gender transitioning, the case has implications for parental rights related to religious freedom, freedom of speech, and due process.
Anne Georgulas has charged Younger, her ex-husband and Jamess father, with child abuse for not affirming their son as a transgender girl, according to court documents.
She has also sought restraining orders against Younger, she is trying to terminate his parental rights, and also seeks to compel Younger to pay for Jamess visits with a transgender-affirming therapist and for medical procedures to transition James to a girl.
The controversial treatment could include hormonal sterilization that could begin in as soon as two years when James turns eight, in preparation for James to later have sexual reassignment surgery.
James mother has changed her sons name to Luna. She dresses him in a girls clothing, shoes, and makeup, and James uses the girls restroom at school.
The court has awarded her the sole right to consent to psychiatric and psychological treatment of James and his twin brother Jude, rendering the boys father unable to get a second opinion. Younger is even prohibited from cutting his sons hair, having been reported by a teacher to Texas Child Protective Services for giving James a haircut.
Since the cost for psychological and psychiatric treatment of children is considered child support in Texas, a website on the case created by friends of the family says, and current Texas statutes being what they are, Younger could be forced to pay for the sexual mutilation of his own son.
When Jamess mother Georgulas, who is a pediatrician, took James for counseling, she picked a gender transition therapist who diagnosed him with gender dysphoria. But Walt Heyer, a former transgender and advocate for those experiencing sex change regret, notes in an article for The Federalist that James does not fit the criteria for the condition.
Heyers piece has brought more attention to the case.
To be diagnosed with childhood gender dysphoria, a mental conflict between a persons biological sex and their perceived gender, a child must be persistent, consistent, and insistent about being the opposite sex.
While Jamess mother is all in on socially transitioning the boy, Heyer writes, providing only female clothes and enrolling him in school with a girls name, James exhibits no signs of gender dysphoria when with his father or others, choosing to dress and live as a boy.
The fact that James changes gender identity depending on which parent is present makes the diagnosis of gender dysphoria both dubious and harmful, Heyer said.
Furthermore, he writes, the transition therapist has observed as well that James is not consistent, insistent, or persistent in the desire to become Luna.
The glaring disparity between a childs preferred identity when in the presence of one parent versus the other should cause a therapist to reassess, perhaps nullify the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and terminate any steps toward transition, said Heyer. But in the case of James, this hasnt happened.
Dr. Michelle Cretella, Executive Director of the American College of Pediatricians, concurred that James does not fit the profile for gender dysphoria.
James clearly does not have gender dysphoria, Cretella told LifeSiteNews.
According to the pro-transgender pediatricians themselves, a child is allegedly trans if he consistently and persistently insists he is a girl, she said. Well, when James is away from his mother, he consistently and persistently insists that he is a boy.
Heyer learned of Jamess case recently while in the area for a speaking engagement. In his article he chronicled specifics of this disparity in how James acts, with accounts from Younger, family friends, and a pastor who knows the family.
What James is consistent about when hes not with his mother is that he rejects the idea that he is Luna girl.
James exhibits no desire to be Luna the girl except when he is with his mother, Heyer said. The boys behavior offers a stinging rebuke of the diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
This by all accounts is not a true or clinically correct diagnosis of gender dysphoria, he continued. Yet the therapist stands by her diagnosis and continues to keep Luna on track to gender transition.
James['s] precious young life hinges purely on the diagnosis of gender dysphoria by a therapist who wraps herself in rainbow colors, affirms the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and dismisses evidence to the contrary, Heyer said. Remove the rainbow from James[s] diagnosis, and it crumbles under the weight of the criteria for the diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
What is happening to poor James is a testament to how politicized and anti-science pediatrics has become regarding gender identity formation in children, said Cretella, a pediatrician and expert who has written and spoken extensively about the issue.
Cretella offered a possible explanation for why mothers may push their sons to try to live as girls.
Some mothers who force their sons to impersonate girls suffer from gender mourning, she said.
Drs. Kenneth Zucker and Susan Bradley, world renowned experts in the treatment of childhood gender identity disorders, described encountering some mothers who so desperately wanted a girl, that they entered a profound state of depression after bearing only sons, explained Cretella. The mothers depression was gradually alleviated only by one son acting in an effeminate manner or allowing her to dress him as a girl.
The family friends behind the Save James website have kept a blog on the case, providing a timeline, court documents, prayers, research, and other resources on gender ideology. Jamess mother is doing all she can to keep Younger from their boys, they say, and where she has a lot of support and financial backing, Younger is on his own with limited resources.
Heyer warned that an authentic diagnosis is vital for the sake of the child.
The diagnosis is critical, he said, because labeling a child with gender dysphoria can trigger a series of physical and mental consequences for the child and has legal ramifications in the ongoing custody case. Get it wrong and young Jamess life is irrevocably harmed.
Its up to the adults to observe the child carefully, said Heyer, consider and question the grey areas, and ultimately guard innocent children against hasty diagnoses and conclusions about something so fundamental as their gender identity.
My comments were for this particular child. They have begun to screw up his life. Especially with the parental differences. IMO he should have only one home, visitation by the other parent, stop all transition talk, no encouragement right now, just let the boy sort himself out, no therapists because they push transition. Homeschool him so he has no social pressure, keep him active in what he loves to do, and let him just be him. Let him wear what he chooses, etc. For now. But that wont happen, Im sure. Politics trumps his health. Sigh.
Democrats are evil.
You know, the vast majority of accident death by falling occurs in the home. Slipping getting out of the shower is a big one. Especially if the last person who showered accidently spilled a heap of body oil in the floor. I know if I were the father there is nothing I would not do to protect my child from anyone, including the mother.
What judge made this decision? Can’t the good governor of Texas get involved here? This mom is literally destroying this child’s life.
AYKM?
Figures - that’s just downright evil of her
If she were my pediatrician, I’d be leaving her and finding someone else!
If you read the article, she’s charging the father with child abuse for not accepting the child’s alleged gender change.
She knows it’s the one untouchable subject that would guarantee the father never see his son again.
No they don’t.
so sick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.