Posted on 11/27/2018 12:12:42 PM PST by GuavaCheesePuff
The midterm elections did not give Democrats a singular leader to rally behind, nor did it settle ideological divides in the party. But the results can tell us a lot about the mood among Democratic voters, and what they might be looking for in a 2020 presidential nominee.
First, much hay has been made about the choice between progressives on one hand and moderates or centrists on the other. You could read the midterms results as vindication for the latter; outspoken progressives like Kara Eastman in Nebraskas 2nd Congressional District and Leslie Cockburn in Virginias 5th Congressional District fell short, while a large number of self-described moderate Democrats flipped Republican-held seats in contests across the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
Primaries are a waste of money for Democrats.
Went to the wikipedia entry. What a story. Largest mass execution by U.S. San Patricios still honored in Mexico today. Santa Ana smarter than given credit for.
All I knew before now was that they carried Brown Bess flintlocks as in War of 1812.
I think it’s a lot less than that. I read somewhere around 60%
Their last two presidential candidates were not white men.
Steyer and Bloomberg have the $$$$$. Terry McAuliffe as well.
No. Just 47% of white women.
I think it's close to 70 percent. Another detail: I have also read that the statistics published by some of the racial bean-counters put into the "Hispanic" and therefore "non-white" category anyone with a Spanish surname. That drags all kinds of people into the Hispanic cohort whose families have been here since before the Civil War or the Revolution--in other words, Americans, people who speak English, and whose genetic and cultural heritage is predominantly what is called "white."
It would be great to have a source that accounts for the cultural identity of various cohorts of those referred to as Hispanic.
Wasn’t he the victim of Leopold and Loeb?
“Any white male that votes Democrat is not just stupid, he is suicidal”
And yet, there are many, my cousin’s husband and my brother among them. Neither is stupid. As for suicidal, they seem to believe that the Democrats’ anti-White-Male positions are meant for OTHER White-males, not them. On the other hand, both are retired Federal bureaucrats, so I think their status as part of the governing elite (former members, at least) trumps their white-male-enemy status, in their eyes.
The difference in minority turnout between Obama and Clinton would have won 2016 for the dems. They would be nuts not to run a minority in 2020 to try to increase minority turnout.
Freegards
Terrible writing....
Any white male who votes demonrat, is a cuck.
Doesn’t matter. They can cheat and elect who they want.
They’re still slave owning white men, by and large. The ownership has diversified a little, but only a little.
“Democrats Have Made One Thing Very Clear About 2020: Theyre Over White Men”
What they are over is Western Civilization. White Culture, if that term is preferred.
If alleged ballot box fraud by Democrats turns out to be true as predicted, and well probably never find out, Im not convinced that election results really tell us anything about mood among Democratic voters.
Researcher claims a TSUNAMI of voter fraud coming in 2018 midterms (8-9-18)
The Democrat Party has been over White men, and for that matter, White women also, for a coon’s age. The problem is, that White men and White women are not through with the Democrat Party.
“A lot of white people are stupid and votes for a party that hates them and wants them all to die.”
Maybe because the Repubs haven’t pointed it out to them. Just like they haven’t pointed out the RATS hate America.
38% of the populating is white men, give or take a few million.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.