Good. Take the fight to them Mr. President.
Roberts may be setting himself up for recusal, thus leading to a 4-4 tie and thus leaving a 9th circuit ruling to stand
Bingo!
The USSC appointments were for LIFE to insure that the Judges decisions were NOT political and that a good political job wasn't at the end of their reign if they ruled a certain way.
But you can't tell me that any women on the bench would even consider the possibility of overturning Roe vs Wade. The Obama female appointments WERE political...period.....no doubt.
McConnell’s Judge protected Acosta.
What can I tell you? Roberts didn’t criticize Obama because he was afraid of him.
Does he actually know that Scalia died of natural causes? No.
Does he know that President Trump isn’t dangerous to the court, or to the rule of law? Yes.OTOH the courts all pretend that none of them are anything but apolitical. It is de riguer. I refer you to the Bush v. Gore case, in which - notwithstanding the best efforts of the Supreme Court of Florida - SCOTUS found that Bush won Florida fair and square.
The majority in that case knew perfectly well that the Supreme Court of Florida had its thumb on the scales for Gore. That’s why they decided as they did. But the last thing they wanted (after seeing Gore wrongly win) was to admit that the Supreme Court of Florida was cooking the books. Which is why they famously warned against anyone ever citing Bush v. Gore as precedent.
The fact that Justice Roberts feels free to criticize Trump for telling the truth about the Ninth Circus is a sign of the health of the Republic.
Even if the fact that Mr. Trump was correct is not.
Protection and security are two things you will never get from the democrats see border.
Their list is a long one.
The proof of Trump’s criticism is that Democrats have a history of court shopping to determine where they file some of their cases.
Justice Roberts is in fact a problem.
His decision on the basic ACA (the “Affordable Care Act”— otherwise known as Obamacare) is simply indefensible on any grounds—it is just plain wrong.
His decision in King v. Burwell (interpretation of the provision in the healthcare bill) is also wrong—he reverses the plain meaning of the words in the statute to get a result favorable to the Obama Health Care program.
Following those decisions, gossip was widespread that Robert’s had been leveraged because there were legal irregularities in connection with the adoption of his children.
I assume that at this point, Roberts would say the threat to the adoption was irrelevant, that would have been his decision anyway. Fine. But he should be free of any risk of that issue.
Judiciary should initiate an inquiry about the adoption and if the story about improprieties and irregularities is correct, Roberts should either resign or be impeached on the grounds that he is subject to pressure on the issue.
No, Conservatives do not this, but the left absolutely and blatantly does. Conservatives are not picking judges to rubber stamp their own ideology and political desires. Conservatives are trying, to the best degree that they can, to place judges who believe in basing their decisions upon THE CONSTITUTION.
Please author of this article, do not even go there. Do not ever compare the honest motives of Conservatives in doing what is right by placing Constitutionalists judges with the left's evil, diabolical attempts to destroy our foundations by outright trampling upon THE CONSTITUTION with their appointments, better described as their plants. The left, with no compuncture whatsoever, is driven to place "judges" whose real goals are to turn this Country into their perverted, sick idea of a leftist, utopian thuggary. The Constitution, nor the rule of law, is of no interest to them at all, except as they can use and twist it to make it say whatever they want to fulfill their evil, selfish, perverse objectives. It is their very nature.
Chief justice Roberts is like a little girl on the playground “why are you being mean to all the judges”? Maybe just because Trump is right and Roberts is again wrong