Posted on 11/23/2018 12:21:31 AM PST by Kaslin
After yet another liberal California judge earlier this week blocked one of President Trumps policies - this time a new asylum rule that would have required applicants to arrive at a designated port of entry (a lot to ask, I know) - the understandably frustrated president lashed out at liberal courts in general.
I think its a disgrace when every case gets filed in the 9th Circuit, said Trump. Thats not law, thats not what this country stands for. Every case that gets filed in the 9th Circuit, we get beaten and then we end up having to go to the Supreme Court, like the travel ban, and we won.
The president was referring to the fact that, as luck has it, the decision would need to be appealed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Known affectionately as the 9th Circus Court or The Nutty 9th, this wackadoodle collection of Birkenstock-wearing hippies who call themselves judges - the same group that famously ruled the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because it contains the words under God - seems to take delight in foiling literally everything Trump-related that comes before them on the basis of the firm legal precedent that Trumps a meanie.
How liberal? Put it this way - so liberal even the squishy Senator Jeff Flake introduced a bill last year that would have split them up, lamenting that the court, as currently comprised, represents 40 percent of all the landmass in the U.S., 20 percent of the population.
So when Trump took a swipe at this black-robe-clad West-Coast edition of the Che Guevara fan club, he merely echoed sentiments conservatives have had for years. But because its all cool and stuff to criticize Trump, none other than Chief Justice John Roberts felt obligated to speak out.
We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges, Roberts said in a statement to the Associated Press. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.
Interestingly, as Senator Chuck Grassley pointed out Wednesday via Twitter, presidents have criticized courts before - even the Supreme Court - and not gotten nearly the backlash from Roberts.
Grassleys history lesson referred to 2010, when former President Obama criticized the Supreme Courts then-recent 5-4 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, a campaign finance case, during his first State of the Union speech. Obamas public humiliation of the court in front of the entire nation - while they were all sitting there, no less - was so egregious that Justice Alito felt compelled to famously mouth the words not true as the world looked on.
To his credit, Roberts addressed the issue several weeks later but his criticism wasnt so much directed at Obama himself, but rather at the very troubling political atmosphere at the State of the Union address. In fact, the chief justice actually went out of his way to suggest that Obama and others have an obligation to criticize what we do if they disagree.
Not so with Trump, of course. Instead, were lectured about judges somehow being apolitical when anyone with any political sense knows thats not true.
Can we attribute Roberts statement to congeniality alone? Sure, its good to get along with the people you work with, especially if youre stuck with them literally for life. It would be miserable to have the same hatred for people you spend most of your day with that Left and Right seem to have for each other in the Trump-era. So in that sense I get that Kavanaugh and Kagan probably enjoy playing patty-cake together and Roberts probably gets a do-gooder rush when he holds Ginsburgs knitting while she takes her 5th power nap of the day.
But lets not forget that these judges are literally deciding whether America prospers over the next several decades or whether our country turns into a Third World hellhole. Yes, they have far too much power, but power they have, power that affects us all in more ways than we can imagine. They may be set for life, but our lives in many ways hang in the balance.
Roberts statement responding to Trump, while assumedly well-meaning, speaks to the myopia of a man who has been removed from the life of an ordinary American for far too long. No Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges ?? Is this man serious? First of all, are there ANY examples of a judge appointed by Obama or Clinton NOT consistently ruling to strip the Constitution of every shred of its original meaning and turn the United States into a Third World banana republic?
On the other hand, while there are wonderful examples of judges appointed by conservative presidents literally preserving our nation with smart rulings, why do far too many of these judges get mushy in the head as their time on the bench grows? We all know what happened to David Souter. The real question is - will the same fate befall John Roberts?
President Trump deservedly lashed out at the chief justice again on Thanksgiving:
Justice Roberts can say what he wants, but the 9th Circuit is a complete & total disaster, Trump tweeted. It is out of control, has a horrible reputation, is overturned more than any Circuit in the Country, 79%, & is used to get an almost guaranteed result. Judges must not Legislate Security and Safety at the Border, or anywhere else. They know nothing about it and are making our Country unsafe. Our great Law Enforcement professionals MUST BE ALLOWED TO DO THEIR JOB! If not there will be only bedlam, chaos, injury and death. We want the Constitution as written!
The Constitution as written. Perish the thought. Sure, maybe thats what most ordinary Americans want, but does John Roberts? Or does the man who has already ruled to keep Obamacare wish to replace Anthony Kennedy as the courts swing-vote, and thus the most important person in America?
Roberts:
"What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.>
It has to be done now. Remember, the communists Democrats own the House and they will destroy the Republican Party. Trump lost his chance many months ago by failing to fire Sessions, Rosenstein, and totally release all documents to Congress. Trump really failed us saving America. Maybe he should learn how the Democrats work destruction.
Roberts is all about keeping the Judiciary “independent” in his PR efforts.
He knew that if he pushed back against Obama the media would defend Obama and make Roberts (and the Judiciary) look bad.
He knews that if he attacks Trump the media will trumpet his nonsense that Judges are above politics and burnish the Judiary’s image.
Arguing with Roberts about other judges is idiotic. Because youre going to get a liberal ruling just to show you they werent intimidated.IOW, business as usual.
Unlike people like you Trump is going to remain on the side of truth and honesty and not going to kiss any liberal asses...Thank God.
I was just responding to the headline. I think Roberts will fly completely off the reservation.
Maybe Roberts can get a visit to the Texas pedifile ranch and have a heart attack.
Obama like Capone made a lot of judges.
"Some people, I think, have an obligation to criticize what we do, given their office, if they think we've done something [wrong],"
The fact Roberts can’t see that almost implies he agrees with the law making role the 9th circuit takes on. Which means he may very well side with illegal immigrants if when it gets to the Supreme Court.
Is this the same Robert who, according to rumor (only a rumor, and therefor not proven fact) did some thing slightly illegal concerning the adoption of children.
>> Make people think!<<
Of course, but unfortunately almost every institution of our culture that influences how people think has successfully indoctrinated an enormous number of people to think that America is irredeemably EVIL, and that thinking otherwise is itself evil.
Bump
Not hype, as it turns out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.