Posted on 11/16/2018 1:15:01 PM PST by EyesOfTX
The Evening Campaign Update (Because The Campaign Never Ends)
No, Jim Acosta and CNN did not “win” their case today, so everybody needs to calm down here.
All the plaintiffs in the case against the White House this morning was an injunction in which the judge in the case, Timothy Kelly, ordered the restoration of Acosta’s hard pass to the White House grounds while the case is in the process of being heard and decided. Believe it or not, I think this was a completely reasonable action for the judge to take, since it ensures Acosta will not have been unfairly disadvantaged in the event that CNN and Acosta are able to make a compelling case that ends with a ruling in their favor.
Make sense?
Now, in addition to ordering Acosta’s pass to be restored, the judge let it be known that he thinks CNN and Acosta are likely to prevail on their 5th Amendment, due process-based argument that Acosta was not provided with “sufficient notice or explanation before his credentials were revoked or been given sufficient opportunity to respond before they were.” As it happened, Acosta was actually given no notice at all – he simply showed up at the Secret Service station outside the White House grounds where he normally presents his credentials before entering and was informed at that time that they had been revoked.
While the White House press office spelled out its reasons after the fact, the judge has ruled that this was not sufficient notice.
Judge Kelly also made it clear that he does not believe CNN or Acosta have an unfettered First Amendment-based right to a White House press badge.
Thus, basically what has happened today is that Judge Kelly has forced the White House to put Acosta on probation. His press badge will be restored while the case is being heard and will be revoked again should the Judge ultimately rule against the plaintiffs.
In the meantime, both President Trump and White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders have promised to write up and publish a formal set of rules for decorum that Acosta and all other fake reporters must follow while on the White House grounds and during press briefings.
President Trump commented on the entire process earlier today in an interview with Fox News’s Chris Wallace:
Trump told Wallace it’s “not a big deal,” saying, “What they said, though, is that we have to create rules and regulations for conduct… we’re doing that, we’re going to write them up right now. It’s not a big deal. And if he misbehaves, we’ll throw him out or we’ll stop the news conference.”
“Nobody believes in the First Amendment more than I do. And if I think somebody is acting out of sorts, I will leave. I’ll say, ‘Thank you very much, everybody. I appreciate you coming.’ And I’ll leave. And those reporters will not be too friendly to whoever it is that’s acting up.”
These White House press briefings have been taking place in their modern format since the mid-1970s. In all that time, the White House had never had a need to write up formal rules for decorum because the reporters involved were mature enough and had enough respect for the setting and the office of the presidency to know how to behave themselves. But today, unfortunately, the pack of childish jackals who now make up the White House press corps no longer possess those qualities as a group.
So, just like in any elementary school across America, the rules for behavior will be written up, probably posted on the wall, and anyone who acts up and violates them will be sent to the office for punishment. It’s pathetic, really, but then again, this is CNN and Jim Acosta we’re talking about here.
That is all.
Follow me on Twitter at @GDBlackmon
Did you read about the opinion? There is a 1977 Court Precedent that says a reporter has to be given notice and an opportunity to respond before their credentials can be withdrawn. Acosta was give NO NOTICE. That is the grounds on which he is likely to prevail.
Listening to President Trump talk about it today, there appear to be “Jim Acosta Memorial Press Regulations and Procedures” in the works. I am sure his colleagues will thank him for bringing the President’s attention to this matter. ;-)
I’m referring to the fact that the only thing he was deprived of was the power or scope to act as one pleases, which is the second definition of liberty in the dictionary.
“And then a judge will preside over litigation of the rules. This puts the judiciary in charge rather than the WH.”
Yup...soon antifa will have to be given press passes.
I know the author of the article used the word "childish" for dramatic effect, however a young pack of jackals are innocent animals. Acosted is not young and he is not innocent. He is a full grown-@$$ed adult who should know better.
I think if after President Trump produces his Rules of Conduct, he should stipulate that for every lamestream journalist who acts contrary to the established rules, he will remove them and bring in a real journalist of his own choosing in their place.
There are lots of Trump-supporting guys like us out here.
Why are rules required? Where is this in the Constitution? “Rules of decorum”?! This is silliness dictated by the judiciary. This is precisely what needs to stop!
“There is a 1977 Court Precedent that says a reporter has to be given notice and an opportunity to respond before their credentials can be withdrawn. “
So this is the second ridiculous ruling on the subject. Or have there been more?
You’re exactly right and it appears that many can’t see the obvious here.
“There is a 1977 Court Precedent that says a reporters...”
Who cares? I wasn’t aware the courts were the final authority on everything...
Good, this should take 1-2 days at most and then execute the new rules starting Monday.
Just end the whole thing ! The WH Briefing is an anachronism! Let everyone ask questions through the WH website. Assign a number, rank order them by relevant topic, then answer the 1st 100 in a day or so & make it downloadable available to all. Breaks the MSM monopoly, ends the silly notion they’re something special. The networks can have shows where those preening pinheads can agonize over the questions & answers. The real question is, ‘ Will anyone watch?’.
Tell the Judge to buzz off. This is a separation of power issue and surly who the President invites onto White House property is in his control alone. It’s like who the owner of a House allows inside his own home. Silly to even think anybody else has any say over that
The judge knows that Trump is right on the merits, but does not want Antifa outside his front door threatening his wife and children. The reason that Dims resort to mob rule is that it works. The rule of law be damned. We are on a slippery slope.
I think Acosta’s behavior is escalating, like that of those HS students who eventually make national headlines.
“Tell the Judge to buzz off. “
It has to be done...These black robed tyrants are so out of control that it’s getting really dangerous. It’s not just dangerous, they’re killing off what’s left of our constitutional republic.
And the judge is considering Acosta’s rudeness and arrogance a “capital, or otherwise infamous crime”? Word definitions are really being turned on their head.
Bull Sh*t!
No one has a first amendment right to a press pass. Just cancel the press conference
Good explication. But the fake news won’t stop reporting this as a major victory and a blow to POTUS’ position regarding the MSM and fake news.
I don't thin it does. Acoster wasn't in any sort of legal jeopardy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.