Posted on 11/12/2018 9:04:51 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
A judge has ruled that the Florida election recount has to be finished by Thursday. So at least this will all be over in a few days, right? You might want to hold your horses on that one. Yesterday, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher (whose vote-counting history weve highlighted here before) told CNN that it was going to be impossible for her to meet the deadline. In a separate interview later, she went so far as to suggest that they may have to scrap the recount and just certify the original election results. (The Hill)
SEE ALSO: Avenatti client: Im pursuing assault charges against Tucker Carlson over incident at country club last month
The Palm Beach County, Fla., elections supervisor says it is impossible to finish the three Florida election recounts by the Thursday deadline.
Its impossible, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher told CNN, responding to a question about whether officials would be able to finish the recount on time.
Palm Beach County is one of the most critical counties in the state, alongside Broward County.
The first round of machine recounts is supposed to be completed by Thursday, setting up a bitter fight to the finish in Floridas races for Senate, governor and agriculture commissioner.
So why cant Palm Beach County (and Broward) finish their work on time if 65 other counties are able to meet the deadline? Last night, Bucher told WPBF News that the delays were the fault of archaic voting machines.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Actually no I didnt
There is one line dedicated to my response
Yes I agree its confusing
See second paragraph See Also
I think they have been adding ballots and putting the others aside. Now they have too many to pass muster.
Just as Alas Babylon! has the grace and carriage (now there is an antiquated word— how one “carries” onesself)— to reply to War Daddy’s comment, placed on a different thread (this one is about Palm Beach, FL SOE Bucher’s incompetence and lying excuses— (very easy to do), than the posting about Tucker Carlson’s daughter being called incredibly insulting names to her father’s face-—AT a Country Club! The Club had the decency to revoke the membership— these comments were made by a MEMBER of the Club to Tucker and his daughter on Premises.
We need more information on JUST WHO this a-hole is— and publicly shame him— beyond the lawsuit which Tucker should bring and for which we should all be able to pony up some support!!
War Daddy— am in complete agreement with your post, and refer you to my reply post to Alas Babylon’s wonderful reply to you. Sic Semper Tyrannis, and perhaps more appropriately for the Great State of Tennesee, who delivered Marsha Blackburn, and slaughtered Bredesen— Deo Vindice, from a long ago Great Seal.
Regards!
A setup...they will have a new total (Dem favoring total) by Wednesday.
You’re both right. It’s easy to forget that Bush v. Gore involved TWO Supreme Court decisions, not one. Thank you!
“In a separate interview later, she went so far as to suggest that they may have to scrap the recount and just certify the original election results. (The Hill) “
And then Democrats would be bitching and moaning forever how DeSantis and Scott supposedly stole the election. I can live with that, reluctantly. The alternative would be a leftard Gollum as GOSOF, and a fossil Nelson as senior Senator for Florida.
Well, Mr. Mosby, in fairness to WarDaddy, the OP does have the line:
SEE ALSO: Avenatti client: Im pursuing assault charges against Tucker Carlson over incident at country club last month
Wardaddy’s comment might have directed at that, too.
That would be correct although after 79,000 replies I have indeed posted replies to the wrong thread before
And when I posted this one I saw the title and thought whoops at first till noticed what had triggered my reply
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.