Posted on 11/04/2018 7:14:49 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
An exhaustive investigation into the 11th hour sexual misconduct claims against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh concluded that there was no evidence to back up any of the accusations.
Moreover, the bombshell 414-page report by the Senate Judiciary Committee said that accuser Julie Swetnick and her Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti criminally conspired to lie to Congress.
Following the separate and extensive investigations by both the Committee and the FBI, there was no evidence to substantiate any of the claims of sexual assault made against Justice Kavanaugh, according to the report.
Investigators interviewed 45 people and reviewed the evidence provided by the women who came out of the woodworks in September 2018 to accuse Kavanaugh of groping or raping them when he was a teenager.
Judy Munro-Leighton, a 70-year-old Kentucky woman, admitted that she concocted a false rape allegation against Kavanaugh even though they had never met.
In her shocking confession, Munro-Leighton said she sent her anonymous letter to Democrat Senator Kamala Harris because she wanted attention.
She later admitted that she was not the author of [the letter] and merely used it as a ploy to get attention and had never met Justice Kavanaugh, according to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Judy Munro-Leighton is a retired history teacher who has regularly donated to the Democrat Party, according to the Federal Election Commission. Investigators discovered that Munro-Leighton was a left-wing activist who is 17 years older than Kavanaugh.
(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...
Indictments? When? Do we have to wait until we get an Attorney General?
Did she want attention...or was she offered a quid pro quo?
Avenetti thinks running for President will provide protection.
It worked for Shrillary.
Yet, NOTHING will happen to them.
414 pages? Are these people paid by the page? Why does it take 414 pages to say, “they lied”?
Admitting to felonies without even a lawyer? Gotta be a democrat. Too stupid to live
In order to demonstrate that they lied, they had to provide the evidence - unlike what Ford, the Dems, Swetnick, Avenatti and the rest did with their claims...
FIGURES----false accuser Munro-Leighton is a retired (cough) history teacher who regularly donated to Democrats, according to the FEC. She's a left-wing activist who is 17 years older than Kavanaugh.
Lock him up. Lock him up.
Nice : Judy, the rapist accuser who now admits she never met Kavanaugh, is a retired teacher. A RETIRED TEACHER.
Lying Ballsy Ford is also an instructor who teaches at the college level.
LYING FILTHY DISGUSTING TEACHERS!!!!
Someone wake up sleepy Sessions.
Nothing will happen.
414 pages?
Are these people paid by the page? Why does it take 414 pages to say, they led?
B Kuz:
Lawyers - Domestic enemy #1
Pubic school teachers - Domestic enemy #2
MSM - Domestic enemy #3
Lawyers - Domestic enemy #1
Pubic school teachers - Domestic enemy #2
MSM - Domestic enemy #3
If she was not the author of the letter, who was? This would appear to not only be lying to congress but engaging in a conspiracy to defraud.
She later admitted that she was not the author of [the letter]
It took them about 30 pages to say there was no merit to the charges against Kavanaugh. The rest of it was the supporting documentation such as interviews. There was some interesting interviews and conclusions. Ford used drugs and liked to party, etc. Ramirez may very well have had a male expose himself to her. There was a known exhibitionist at Yale at the time.
The evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committees investigation, the report concluded.
This is big news. Too big for the MSM to ignore in my opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.