Posted on 10/15/2018 2:26:00 PM PDT by reaganaut1
She’s the Richard Blumenthal of intersectionality, minus the apology.
Do you want to know what media bias looks like?
Earlier today, Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren released DNA test results that confirmed that she misled employers, students, and the public about her Native American heritage for years. Bizarrely, all too many members of the media treated the results as vindicating her. Down is up. Black is white. The imperatives of the resistance apparently dictate propping up a liar — as long as she might be able to beat President Trump in 2020.
Here are the facts. For an extended period of time — at a key point in her professional life — Warren identified herself as a Native American woman. She listed herself as Native American on a key legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees. Former employers — such as the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School — listed Warren as a minority faculty member. Harvard Law School even trumpeted her as the school’s first tenured “woman of color.”
Warren contributed to a Native American recipe book called — I kid you not — “Pow Wow Chow.” She has told people that her parents eloped because her father’s parents said he couldn’t marry her mother “because she is part Cherokee and part Delaware.”
In the progressive academy, misrepresenting your heritage is no small thing. In the early 1990s Harvard was under immense pressure to diversify its faculty. I know. I was there. I remember the sit-ins, the demonstrations, and the tension that pervaded campus. I remember Warren when she came to campus as a visiting professor.
The best comparison to Warren’s misrepresentations — especially in the identity-obsessed academic environment — is to a politician misrepresenting his military experience.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
I’m posting a different pic now...
LOL!
OMG
That’s actually gross...
How soon before they start addressing the issue as “her truth”?
Love that.
Have you got one for CO2 in atmosphere? [.04]
That’s her feminine side.
She-um thinkum too much fire in lodge. Medicine man thinkum she-um getting old. Feel-um fire bolt like-um other old squaw. Feel-um sun under skin.
Soon squaw Crockajawea need-um walking stick.
Ugh. Me think Gray Beaver not get ENOUGH “walking stick”. Make her look like she eating cactus juice.
Yes, the lap dogs MSM thought it was true and rushed to get an apology from Trump.
1 ancestor 1 generation ago = 50% or 1/2 (parent)
1 ancestor 2 generation ago = 25% or 1/4 (grandparent)
1 ancestor 3 generation ago = 12.5% or 1/8 (etc..)
1 ancestor 4 generation ago = 6.25% or 1/16
1 ancestor 5 generation ago = 3.12% or 1/32
1 ancestor 6 generation ago = 1.6% or 1/64
1 ancestor 10 generation ago = 0.1% or 1/1,024
That means that Fauxcahontas at best has 1/64 and just as possibly as little as 1/1,024 Indian DNA. The minimum required to officially claim to be a Native American anywhere is 1/32... and she FAILS under her best case.
And that's without getting into the shortcomings of the DNA test she finally found to suit her purposes and release:
"Detecting DNA for Native Americans is particularly tricky because there is an absence of Native American DNA available for comparison. This is in part because Native American leaders have asked tribal members not to participate in genetic databases..."TRUMP SHOULD DEMAND PAYMENT ON THEIR BET!"To make up for the dearth of Native American DNA, Bustamante used samples from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia to stand in for Native American."
All that’s presuming the Stanford cat isn’t in on her scam
After Obama’s, Feinstein-Ford I’ll bet he’s in on it
I mean, the guy dismissed obtaining Cherokee comparisons, which is ridiculous.
That aspect of the “ testing” isn’t getting enough scrutiny
I just threw up....
Back around the time my daughters were applying to colleges, I tried to validate the legend in my ex’s family that there was Cherokee blood coursing through their veins. The closest I came to achieving that goal was a claim by one of their ancestors who took the family through the Gap in about 1820 that he was half Cherokee, a claim that was hotly disputed by known descendants of the Cherokee in question. If true, my daughters would be either 1/128 or 1/256 Cherokee depending on a number of factors. Needless to say, they did not claim that they were Native Americans on their applications. However, the point here is that I took the time and expended the effort to do real research to validate the claim and identify an actual human being in their family tree - something that Ms. Warren has apparently not done,
It doesn’t matter. There is no autosomal DNA results that can absolutely confirm that someone one had a single ethnic ancestry from 6-10 generations back. It is a myth.
If we are talking about one cherokee from 6-10 generations back those genetic traits are extremely watered down plus the amount of specific DNA traits passed down varies from generation to generation and person to person.
Again — all autosomal DNA tests can really do is match you with distant cousins. It is extremely useful for genealogical research but take any so-called ethnic ancestry results with a grain of salt.
Elizabeth Rachel Dolezal Warren.
BUT..... Oprah had a DNA test done, and it said she was the direct descendant of a ZULU WARRIOR PRINCESS named CHICO.
But apparently, Warren’s test was done by a private ‘entity’ not a well-known agency that would have a list of her cousins.
I heard a woman in the press ask the President if now that Warren had the test results, he was going to pay her. I so wanted him to reply, “I’ll pay her 1/1000th of it.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.