Posted on 10/11/2018 10:27:24 PM PDT by zeestephen
Under this ruling, would the Trump administration ever be allowed to end TPS for any country? [This is a Conservative legal analysis of the District Court ruling that came down about one week ago]
(Excerpt) Read more at cis.org ...
“The CIRCUIT Act would implement the 1998 White Commission’s recommendation to create three regional divisions within the Ninth Circuit in order to improve judicial efficiency.”
Straight up racism...!
He looks like a pole smoker or should I say a chopstick smoker...lol.
I wouldn’t be surprised if most of the rat party and half the repuki party was on the Chicom payroll.
I just looked up how many federal judges(lifetime appointments) that Obola made—329 out of the total 870. No wonder why the courts are so FUBARed.
Exactly....Obama Loaded the courts....with the help of his sidekick Holder, in order to bypass congress and rule by judges...taking the power all the further from the Republicans let alone the people.
Exactly....Obama Loaded the courts....with the help of his sidekick Holder, in order to bypass congress and rule by judges...taking the power all the further from the Republicans let alone the people.
Does the judge have authority?
Tempoary means permanent. Up means down. Wet means dry. Dark means light.
Got it.
IF the House and Senate would quickly pass voter ID laws the dems would not win the election.
SCOTUS needs to issue a major smackdown of these circuit judges.
Trump IS THE EXECUTIVE. He HAS THE AUTHORITY to enforce immigration law AS HE SEES FIT.
The next bozo who sticks there nose into this is getting disciplinary sanctions.
THAT is what needs to happen.
What’s needed is a decision or legislation that courts below the Supreme Court have no authority to decide the constitutionality of presidential orders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.