Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. should place more emphasis on hypersonic weapons development
Great Power War ^ | 10/8/18 | Jon E. Dougherty

Posted on 10/08/2018 1:50:02 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher

Notes Griffin further, in terms of hypersonic missile development, “The rest of the world is not stupid, and they are catching up to us. And, in some areas, have caught up.”

Hypersonic vehicles can travel at speeds up to 5,500 miles per hour (hypersonic is considered five times the speed of sound or Mach 5). Currently, there are no missile defense systems that are agile enough to successfully target a hypersonic missile; in fact, current missile defense systems are vulnerable to spoofing by decoys and could also be rendered ineffective with electronic warfare.

If you add the element of super-speed, then the military advantages gained by fielding credible, workable hypersonic weapons become obvious.

(Excerpt) Read more at greatpowerwar.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; doubleblogpimp; hypersonic; mach5; missiledefense; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/08/2018 1:50:02 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

We had them when I left in 1983, so I think the author is worried for no reason. Also, laser weapons are a lot further along than what they’ll disclose.


2 posted on 10/08/2018 1:53:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher
Does anybody believe the select committees in the House and Senate will approve development of truly effective non-nuclear weapons, capable of destroying critical enemy nuclear targets?

It only takes ONE liberal to stop such a program.

3 posted on 10/08/2018 2:04:46 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Why do you think POTUS created the “Space Force”?


4 posted on 10/08/2018 2:05:11 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Rail guns are already in service....


5 posted on 10/08/2018 2:05:54 PM PDT by Hogblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

How does he know we haven’t already got them in our arsenal?............


6 posted on 10/08/2018 2:07:53 PM PDT by Red Badger (Q............PREPARE FOR 'SKY IS FALLING' WEEK...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nice to hear. Thanks.


7 posted on 10/08/2018 2:08:23 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The Army has had hypervelocity anti tank missiles under development for more than 20 years. No existing or future tank can survive a hit from one of these. Except that, when we don’t field them, they can’t kill a single tank.


8 posted on 10/08/2018 2:12:48 PM PDT by centurion316 (Back from exile from 4/2016 until 4/2018.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hogblog

Really? Where?


9 posted on 10/08/2018 2:17:01 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hogblog

Where?


10 posted on 10/08/2018 2:17:27 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Beat me by 16 seconds.


11 posted on 10/08/2018 2:18:19 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69; Vermont Lt

IIRC The USN Surface.


12 posted on 10/08/2018 2:23:57 PM PDT by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I agree on laser weapons being more developed than most people realize. I’m particularly surprised with the re-fire capability. Not quite up to the make-believe level like in Star Wars, but it’s a lot faster than I thought it would be.

And I’m also surprised at how little power is needed. For years I thought they’d have to be land based or ship based. But now we put them on airplanes and trucks.

The nerds in Huntsville, AL are truly remarkable.


13 posted on 10/08/2018 2:25:11 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 - put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

And maybe on securing national technology secrets.


14 posted on 10/08/2018 2:37:16 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right
Obama cancelled (chemical laser) and we are developing the ABL, is short-range and the Tac Laser is too big for truck and is an airborne weapon (C-130)
15 posted on 10/08/2018 2:43:13 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: XEHRpa; SleeperCatcher

“Why do you think POTUS created the “Space Force”?”

Its not about war IN space, its about war FROM space.

Line of sight weapons like lasers, need a good line of sight.


16 posted on 10/08/2018 2:58:24 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

I could not find a USN surface. What kind of ship is that?


17 posted on 10/08/2018 2:59:38 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; LS

I’m calling BS on your statement, since I actually was a hypersonics designer in the early 90’s. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3106539/posts?page=1


18 posted on 10/08/2018 3:12:12 PM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Not sure, maybe one of the newer Low Radar Crossection ??? that have all the flat stealth type surfaces. And Phased Array Radars.

I could be wrong, it was well over a year ago. I was in an Induced Coma back in 12/2016 - 01/2017 so the Old Memory is not what it used yo be.


19 posted on 10/08/2018 3:18:58 PM PDT by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher; Tell It Right; 2ndDivisionVet; All

Was just listening to JohnBatchelorShow from last friday, top of 3rd hour: sounds like if any one is interested in this topic, listen to this: talking w soneone following big sysems, esp B52

New weapon — fired from B21 or soon B2? or B52 w 5 weapons systems being developed for it, laying MINES, doesnt have to be over TARGET TO DO IT.

Nice for shallow water as Southchina sea ISLANDS! a whole line of them w accuracy from HIGH UP !!

etc — a new stealth bomber being worked on etc AND MORE


20 posted on 10/08/2018 3:21:38 PM PDT by PraiseTheLord ( .Q.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson