Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kagan warns that Supreme Court may not have a swing vote anymore
The Hill ^ | 10/05/18 | JUSTIN WISE

Posted on 10/05/2018 7:01:04 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Associate Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said Friday she fears the high court may lack a justice going forward who would serve as a swing-vote on cases, speaking hours after President Trump's second nominee Brett Kavanaugh secured enough votes to be confirmed.

Kagan said at a conference for women at Princeton University that over the past three decades, starting with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and continuing with Justice Anthony Kennedy, that there was a figure on the bench "who found the center or people couldn't predict in that sort of way."

“It’s not so clear, that I think going forward, that sort of middle position — it's not so clear whether we’ll have it," Kagan said.

"All of us need to be aware of that — every single one of us — and to realize how precious the court’s legitimacy is," she added. "It's an incredibly important thing for the court to guard is this reputation of being impartial, being neutral and not being simply extension of a terribly polarizing process."

Kagan, an appointee of former President Obama, spoke Friday alongside fellow Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who also hails from the Supreme Court's liberal bloc.

Justice Elena Kagan: "In the last, really 30 years, starting with Justice O'Connor and continuing with Justice Kennedy, there has been a person who found the center or people couldn't predict in that sort of way."

— The Hill (@thehill) October 6, 2018 Her comments came hours after it became clear that Kavanaugh, Trump's pick to succeed the retiring Kennedy, had enough votes to be confirmed.

Kennedy cast the deciding vote on several high-profile cases before the Supreme Court, and his retirement announcement earlier this year left many on the left voicing concerns that the court would lack a swing-vote going forward.

The Senate voted earlier Friday to end debate on Kavanaugh's nomination, setting up a final vote on his nomination for Saturday afternoon, capping off weeks of controversy surrounding allegations of sexual assault.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) announced Friday that she would vote for Kavanaugh, giving him enough support to get confirmed. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who is running for reelection this year in a state Trump won by 42 points in 2016, also said he would vote for Kavanaugh.

The announcements came about a week after Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, his first accuser, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding Ford's claims that he sexually assaulted her at a high school party in the early 1980s.

Kavanaugh fiercely denied the accusation. He's also denied sexual misconduct claims from multiple other women, Julie Swetnick and Deborah Ramirez.

GOP senators said earlier this week that an FBI probe into Kavanaugh found no corroboration for sexual misconduct allegations against him. Democratic senators have blasted the investigation, calling it inadequate.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chickenlittle; deeplysaddened; elenakagan; kagan; kagankavanaugh; kavanaugh; repealthe19th; scotus; supremecourt; swingvote; teotwawki; theskyisfalling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 last
To: hal ogen

{:-)


201 posted on 10/06/2018 12:19:56 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

#WINNING


202 posted on 10/06/2018 1:31:55 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The justices take an oath to obey the Constitution,don’t they? Not following it should be cause for immediate dismissal or at least a recusal under certain circumstances for certain cases. In a capital punishment situation,I can understand a person’s beliefs not aligning with what the law calls for & a recusal might be the answer to such a situation. Any justice not going along with the idea of following the Constitution after taking the oath of office should be dismissed.


203 posted on 10/06/2018 4:20:19 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

She talks like that’s a bad thing.


204 posted on 10/06/2018 7:51:37 PM PDT by RocketMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson