Posted on 10/02/2018 6:17:07 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Christine Blasey Ford’s ex says she coached people on passing polygraphs. He issued his statement in a sworn statement
I read a comment a week ago, no idea if true, but the man said he was a psychology teacher and a section on polygraphs is part of any curriculum when pursuing a degree. Don’t hold me to that.
Somebody on FR said she had had an affair. That’s why they were in marital counseling. Maybe her ex-lover. The guy must have been blind.
Rachel Mitchell was slammed on FR, as where the “group of old white males” who gave her the reins.
Dems were hoodwinked.
Many women KNEW she was lying from the getgo. She was lying so much I could not stand to watch her.
Note to guys: do NOT try that at home.
Is Mitchell prescient or did a little birdie suggest she ask that question?
What did he say?
If the story you posted is true, you are probably correct. It takes a while to build a case. Maybe the FBI wants to get all the other witnesses on record and then spring some more traps on Ford. Maybe they already have enough facts to present to a Federal Grand Jury.
MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?
FORD: Never.
MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.
FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.
MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?
FORD: Never.
Long term significant other boyfriend.
A good prosecutor always knows the answer before he or she asks the question.
Frankly, she's lucky that she managed to beg even ONE husband; I can't see her being married twice.
Hell....I’m emotionally numb..4-5 days a week.”
Me too. I’m getting to old for this crap.
If true, she needs to be charged with perjury for 1 reason only..........so that the next person thinks twice before opening mouth in a Congressional hearing
Probably just damned good at her job.
MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?
FORD: Never.
MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.
FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.
MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?
FORD: Never.
Oh...thanks.
They've been posted a few times. I don't have them at my fingertips, but they were extremely nonspecific - so that even if you weren't a practiced liar - anyone should have been able to pass. This isn't verbatim, but the two questions were essentially:
Is your statement accurate?
Is any part of your statement false?
No mention of the name 'Kavanaugh'. A simple, and to the point question, would have been: 'Were you ever sexually assaulted by Mr. Kavanaugh?'
Since the two questions just referenced non-specific 'statements', the test taker could have just been thinking about any statements (not having to do with Kavanaugh). At least that was my take on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.