Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Kavanaugh classmate wants FBI to examine texts related to Ramirez allegations
The Hill ^ | 10/01/18 | MICHAEL BURKE

Posted on 10/01/2018 3:40:35 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

A mutual friend of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Deborah Ramirez, one of his sexual misconduct accusers, has asked the FBI to investigate text messages that Kavanaugh and his allies sent to friends before her story was made public.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale when Kavanaugh is accused of exposing himself to Ramirez, emailed FBI agent J.C. McDonough asking the agency to review those messages as part of its reopened background investigation of Kavanaugh, NBC News reported Monday.

NBC reported that text messages between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, a friend of Kavanaugh, suggest the high court nominee was discussing Ramirez's accusations with former classmates before the publication of a New Yorker piece about the allegations. Yarasavage reportedly said in one message that Kavanaugh tried getting her to publicly defend him.

Berchem told NBC News in a statement that she hasn't drawn conclusions about the messages but believes "they merit investigation by the FBI and the Senate."

“I understand that President Trump and the U.S. Senate have ordered an FBI investigation into certain allegations of sexual misconduct by the nominee Brett Kavanaugh. I have no direct or indirect knowledge about any of the allegations against him," Berchem said.

"However, I am in receipt of text messages from a mutual friend of both Debbie and mine that raise questions related to the allegations. I have not drawn any conclusions as to what the texts may mean or may not mean but I do believe they merit investigation by the FBI and the Senate," she added.

Ramirez told The New Yorker that Kavanaugh pushed his exposed genitals into her face during a party in their freshman year at Yale. Kavanaugh has denied the allegations, as well as separate accusations of sexual misconduct made by Christine Blasey Ford and Julie Swetnick.

NBC News reported that the memo Berchem sent to McDonough, the FBI agent, indicates that there are multiple friends of Kavanaugh who haven't yet been but interviewed but who may have information about the alleged incident.

While under oath, Kavanaugh told the Senate Judiciary Panel that the first time he heard of Ramirez's story was from The New Yorker article.

Berchem told NBC News that she resent her memo on Monday to McDonough because she hadn't yet heard back from him.

“I’m sure he’s really busy and expect that he’ll get back to me,” Berchem said.

Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court was approved in the Judiciary Committee on Friday in a party-line vote. But Republican Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) called for an FBI investigation into the new allegations to take place before the full Senate votes on Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court.

President Trump announced Friday that he would ask the FBI to conduct a new investigation into Kavanaugh focusing on the accusations.

The White House on Monday authorized the FBI to expand the investigation from an initial limited list of witnesses to anyone deemed appropriate.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 123oclock4oclockzot; abortion; brettkavanaugh; deborahramirez; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; fakenews; fbi; florida; janemayer; julieswetnick; karenyarasavage; kavanaugh; kerryberchem; maga; mediawingofthednc; michaelavenatti; michaelcohen; nevertrump; nevertrumper; nevertrumpers; nobrainscollectively; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; ramirez; richardvinneccy; ronanfarrow; scotus; smearmachine; stephanieclifford; stormydaniels; thenewyorker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: MassachusettsConservative

Then it’s a meh


41 posted on 10/01/2018 4:42:22 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend... and I just want to say that I haven’t come to any conclusion...


42 posted on 10/01/2018 4:44:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright
He knew about it before it was published.

If they asked him for a quote for the article, they must have told him about the allegation. That was before publication but the source was the New Yorker article.

And in the transcripts, it asks about the senator and her staff mentioning it. They didn't.

43 posted on 10/01/2018 4:44:46 PM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Never send anything via electronic media that you wouldn’t want on the front page of your church bulletin.

There is as of yet very little legal protection for any type of electric communication (with the possible exception of land line telephones).


44 posted on 10/01/2018 4:48:51 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beatthedrum

He was quoted in the story with a denial OF COURSE he knew the story was coming out, that is not at odds with him saying that he first heard of the allegations via the New Yorker story. He didn’t say first time he heard about it was when he READ it in the magazine.
The texts were ABOUT the upcoming story and the allegations.


45 posted on 10/01/2018 4:50:24 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
Correct.

Note what the question was: INCIDENT IN QUESTION.

Look what Fake News NBC left out of the "story."

Oh wait, Judge Kavanaugh had already heard and testified that Ramirez was calling around looking for dirt on him. He didn't know the specific allegation, but he had every reason to try to pre-empt something from her.

NBC is lying. As usual.

46 posted on 10/01/2018 4:51:08 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another you’ve been messing around...

(apologies to REO Speedwagon)


47 posted on 10/01/2018 4:51:33 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

You hear people are making up a smear and you ask them to help defend youself and that is cause for “invetigation”

HOW about we spend even 10% as much effort investigated the smear machine has we have the accused?


48 posted on 10/01/2018 4:57:02 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (2016: For the first time since 1984, I voted for a Rep President all other votes were anti Dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

Yes. I just went and looked at the article and she said she was drunk.


49 posted on 10/01/2018 4:57:31 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Thank you!!


50 posted on 10/01/2018 4:59:43 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Just read in the NewYorker that Judge’s ex girlfriend with her attorney wants to talk to the FBI as she has information regarding Judge and Kav. Said she felt morally obligated to challenge Judge’s description of his and Kavanaugh’s high-school sex lives as innocent.

I have to say, Kav should never have made the statement he was a virgin. It wasn’t necessary to state that during the hearing. You deny the allegations of Ford, you don’t give them more then asked. In my line of work with government audits, we are hammered with this, only answer what they ask, never give them more then they ask for. We are rated as one of the best organizations for our financial book-keeping. Lot of tight controls and 4 audits a year.


51 posted on 10/01/2018 5:11:16 PM PDT by Engedi (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
"Apparently, that's illegal now."

Better not call friends as character witnesses anymore.

52 posted on 10/01/2018 5:13:11 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

The only case one can make based on hearsay concerning ancient matters of little relevance is a political one.

Newspapers that publish hearsay ought to go out of business.


53 posted on 10/01/2018 5:15:49 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

(((AG)))@Twitter Utterly Debunks Latest NBC Smear Against Kavanaugh
Twitter | 10/1/2018 | (((AG)))
Posted on 10/01/2018 4:59:48 PM PDT by mojito
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3692624/posts


54 posted on 10/01/2018 6:12:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I heard it from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, blah, blah, blah.

This is just so beyond ridiculous at this point. I can’t imagine being Judge Kavanaugh and having to deal with this nonsense. He’s tough though, I’ll give him credit for that.


55 posted on 10/01/2018 6:17:22 PM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

He didn’t say that he was a virgin during the hearing, he said that in his interview with Fox. Either way, it’s still he said she said.

This is all just silly nonsense and gossip. It’s just so ridiculous.

He is as clean as a whistle. The fact that they had to go back to his high school years to try and dredge stuff up should prove that.


56 posted on 10/01/2018 6:20:58 PM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

I thought the accusation was that he showed her a dildo.


57 posted on 10/01/2018 7:27:56 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Maybe so. Lost count. I believe my point stands in that scenario. Would
Never think twice about that a week, a year or 10 years later.


58 posted on 10/01/2018 7:39:34 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

There is so much one can say about women accusing a man of abuse that makes many take the she side but just wait until we hear a she said/she said. Good luck in that scenario!


59 posted on 10/02/2018 3:36:31 PM PDT by janee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan

I was sent an article from the New Yorker about a certain Yale Classmete who claims to have heard about this incident - AProfessor Appold, who was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale and is now a professor of religion at Princeton Theological Seminary. He says that he had heard the story from another classmate, at or near the time it occurred, about the party that Kavanaugh and Deborah Ramirez attended.

When I tried to post the article and its link, I got a message that we can’t post articles from the New Yorker here.

Sorry to bring it up but it is relevant to this thread. Any refutations are welcome.


60 posted on 10/04/2018 12:17:46 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson