Posted on 09/30/2018 8:54:49 PM PDT by bitt
After a careful review of all of the evidence put fourth by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has released a report which completely exonerates the judge.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEI_mU0AIP5wG.jpg
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
IMHO... The person that was interviewed on TV, in front of millions was NOT Christine Ford.
The woman we saw was a ‘double’. That is why it took so long to get her to ‘testify’. They had to ‘train’ the double.
That is why she had to read from notes.
That is why the squeeky voice. She was attempting to mimic the real Christine’s voice.
That is why the parent’s/family weren’t there to support her.
That is why she was wearing glasses that look like they were purchased at a Blind Thrift store and smeared with vaseline.
Allegedly, Christine Ford has a Ph.D, Master’s Degrees, several houses, the support of the entire DEM PARTY and the MEDIA and yet she COULDN’T PURCHASE a pair of glasses the correct SIZE to fit her head and evenly space the lenses in front of her eyes, and couldn’t afford even a KLEENEX to wipe them off.
The glasses were purposely chosen and dirtied to DISABLE facial recognition.
Can anyone give any other reason that a person would appear on TV, in front of the world, with glasses like this ? Any reason at all ?
LOL those 3 have never cared what the people who voted them in think
They are typical politicians who are only out for themselves and use the people that they are supposed to represent as fodder to vote them in
Lip service to the peons then off to the lobbyists to sell favors
Ya know damn well the Fib already had their report written even before there was ever a hearing. It’s whut they do!
He was money laundering his Play Doh.
If there is no sperm, you must confirm!
*IMHO... The person that was interviewed on TV, in front of millions was NOT Christine Ford.
The woman we saw was a ‘double’. That is why it took so long to get her to ‘testify’. They had to ‘train’ the double.*
Ummmmm, that would be BEYOND stunning, but, I’m really doubting that.
So: she knew enough to contact WaPo’s tipline with a phone app, but not how to contact her Senators/Representatives ??
This ain't a Perry Mason rerun.
So funny that your name is ‘U Can See’ after reading your post.
I thought the smudged glasses were to hide her lying eyes.
You take it a step further and state it’s to help deter facial recognition.
And you may be right. It also explains the mop hair in her face half the time.
I suppose a good still shot of her would allow for a reverse image shot and she will be popping up in multiple settings in other folks’ Fakebook pics which have not been scrubbed.
Any sleuths out there willing to give it a shot? This could be an interesting game if she begins surfacing with Hillary or a Hollywood Actor’s group. Sometimes a picture tells a thousand stories.
Bottom, thanks for posting these!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEI_mU0AIP5wG.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJbPUUAAzU46.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJ7VU4AAWRYF.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEKibUwAECED8.jpg
Luv free republic, thanls for posting this!
https://mobile.twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1046595107271659522
How could she possibly have done a *good* job??? She had 5 minute blocks to make a point and "Doctor" Ford was stalling her constantly.The Rats clearly coached her to do exactly that.The Rats knew at the outset that the whole setup was a huge advantage to them...they each got 5 minutes to tell the world how brave she was to fly all the way to DC while the "prosecutor" got to wait while she reviewed documents.
Lol so?
If there was body double, it would have been for the polygraph test. That is why Mitchell asked if there were any videos taken of her session.
Can anyone give any other reason that a person would appear on TV, in front of the world, with glasses like this ? Any reason at all ?
—
Yes. I believe they’re reading glasses. When she had to look at the chart from across the room, she pushed them back on top of her head in order to see it. If she’s in the habit of repeatedly pushing them to the top of her head to see distance, then in front of her eyes to read, I can see that accounting for the fingerprints on them.
Thank you...
Besides - why would you need a double of someone when no one really knows what she looks like anyway?
Mitchell got hosed letting Ford read her papers on first question. Didn’t happen again.
Anything other than soft pedal approach would have backfired. It is all about optics.
She got lies out of Ford as well as info about Feinstein and Katz. I wish she had done more, but 5 min blocks made it very difficult.
Her report is very helpful to Republicans.
“The case is so weak no reasonable prosecutor would bring it forward. “
Perhaps the photo of the person taking the polygraph was not Ford.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
