Posted on 09/28/2018 12:30:13 PM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full title: FORD CAUGHT IN MAJOR LIE? City Remodeling Permits Show Project She Linked to Kavanaugh Was in 2008 NOT 2012
LYING UNDER OATH TO THE US SENATE IS A CRIME
Christine Blasey Ford told the US Senate Judiciary Committee that the memories of Brett Kavanaugh first came up when she went into counseling in 2012. In May 2012 Ford and her husband argued over her desire to add a second front door to their home. Ford told the committee on Thursday the desire for a second door was because Brett Kavanaugh made her claustrophobic.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
What was it the known liar Blumenthal said: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one thing, false in everything.
Ford lied about remodeling her home. She lied about a fear of flying. None of the “witnesses” she identified remembers the events she described. Some people would generalize and say she’s a liar. I’m ready to generalize.
And Brett Kavanaugh makes you claustrophobic,. uh ..exactly how???? enough to add another door to the kitchen?????
Reads to me like a fraudulent tax return. IRS should audit them, regarding how those extravagant luxury items were justified.
“Be careful, permits obtained on projects may last years. There could have been delays.”
Dr. Ford testified under oath that she realized she needed a second front door after her therapy sessions in 2012 triggered memories of Kavanaugh.
That rule doesnt apply to anti Trumppers. Keep uo
~~~~~~~
Like someone else said, Ford needs to file a report with the police. Then she can find out how far that gets her.
“This FBI needs to investigate” is a stall tactic, period!!
But if she pulled the permits in 2008 for the job, how can she now allege her 2012 therapy sessions triggered memories of Kavanaugh and she realized she needed a second front door?
How would that work?
You mean Chrissy Blowsey Ford?
The scared, mousy, squeaky, traumatized little girl who claimed she was afraid to fly from California to Washington, DC for the hearing?
The same woman who flew to the east coast before the hearing to collude with Dianne Feinstein?
And then flew back to California?
The same woman who routinely flies thousands of miles across the Pacific Ocean to go surfing in Hawaii, Costa Rica and the South Pacific?
That Lying Fraud?
And she flies.
She flies now.
She flies all over the world ... weeee!
Totally busted.
I wouldn’t be surprised if she remains a democrat darling.
But she is SO busted that I would not be entirely surprised if she’s not.
Reads more like an MKULTRA victim.
If true, maybe the Deep State has multiple victims who have been hypnotized into having false memories to derail any conservative, just ready to receive that phone call...
‘The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but I have promises to keep and miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep.’”
Maybe that was the phrase Huma Abedin whispered to Mitch McConnell at McCain’s funeral.
Must buy another copy of Catcher in the Rye....
During the hearing she used the word “esthetic” when the front door question was asked. I don’t recall if she she said it was added for esthetic reasons or if the house looks esthetically pleasing now.
I was getting out of my car when she said that word and wondered why she said “esthetic” instead of “claustrophobic”
building permits have a time limit..also property tax records on both houses should be checked for homeowners exemption..
rental houses may need city permit..
FBI investigate!
Sounds like this confirmation process.
I can only recall Roger Clemons getting in trouble for that.
So, do they actually have random google employees living in their home? Im unclear on that, but if they do, how can this extremely traumatized woman allow strangers to share her home? To me, that seems like something youd want to avoid if youve had the kind of trauma she claims to have experienced. I mean, if you are making your home safe and comfortable, and you need to install a second door to do that, how in the world would you feel safe or comfortable with complete strangers (and their occasional guests) having access to you at all times? That doesnt make any sense!
For the love of God, I wish people would stop parroting she was a compelling, credible witness. Horsecrap. Interrogators do not succumb to emotion. It's about FACTS, and they are not on her side.
Ford, being a piled high and deep (Phd), is a political operative. Her 100% statement by implication makes ONE of them a LIAR. And she can't explain how she got to the house BEfORE the alleged assault. GTFOH.
I think Dr Ford must undergo an FBI background check. If they want one FBI investigation they might as well do two.
I plan to make a few phone calls with this suggestion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.