Posted on 09/28/2018 6:04:57 AM PDT by dangus
Why is it in the Republican talking points that Christine Blasey-Ford is a "credible witness?" Either she's lying or she's crazy or Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her, but EVERY ... LAST ... SINGLE ... REPUBLICAN -- even Lindsey Graham -- I've heard has falling over themselves to establish that she's a "credible witness."
I believe SOMEONE attacked her. Maybe that's why she has spent her career finding uses for the abortion pill, to keep in on market in spite of its disastrous health records, and she has played along with this literally diabolical ambush. She never wanted to go public? Then why did she hire lawyers? Why did she call the Washington Post? Did she think that Diane Feinstein would say, "I have an anonymous tip that Kavanaugh is a rapist," and the Republicans would agree to block her nomination?
No, she is a reprobate, scheming liar who from California who has been attacked at some time in her past, and just like every acting coach advises, she's "using it." There is decent evidence someone attacked her. There is no evidence it was Brett Kavanaugh. Her only support was her testimony, and it stands impeached, so no, she is NOT a credible witness.
You here have all read her laundry list of lies. And I try to keep an open mind... I was waiting to hear something that rang at all truthful about why she couldn't get on an airplane. So he lawyers didn't tell her the committee was willing to COME TO HER? Didn't she READ THE NEWSPAPERS? So she has been put through Hell, she claims, by people attacking her for her claims; if she really didn't want to come forward, wouldn't she be a bit angry at the woman who broke her confidence, rather than bring it up in closed session? She had a borderline-unrealistic chance for Leland to corroborate her claims without admitting to anything at all unbecoming, and still her friend left no room for any doubt that her claims are false.
Here's something that it doesn't seem anyone picked up on: does anyone really believe that the reason she's a basket case (her life would suggest she's not, but she's trying to present that she is on) is because of this fantastically traumatic experience, but she only mentioned it ONCE to her counsellor? Could it be that there's more in those notes that contradict her story?
Rather than providing any credible answer to these problems, she seemed fixated on a cover for the Democrats' failure to investigate her claims: the notion that if only the FBI would investigate, she would be able to deduce from Mike Judge's employment records when she met him in a store, and from that be able to say when she was attacked.
These claims aren't only not credible, they come across like lies carefully crafted with legal counsel. So why are the Republicans saying they seem credible?
I think they're trying to say she THINKS she's telling the truth, but she's wrong. Sorry, saying a woman is just crazy isn't better than saying she's lying. All that anyone is hearing is "she's credible." Which she's not. And the dignity of the Senate, the integrity of the Supreme Court as it tries to re-establish the Constitution, and yes, their own elections hinge on either appointing a DIFFERENT conservative to the Supreme Court, or establishing that Blasey-Ford is NOT credible. Well, it's far too late for that to salvage the dignity of the Senate...
I believe she believes it. But that doesn’t make it true.
Agreed. She’s part of the sham. Has been from the beginning IMO.
Honestly I do not even think she believes it.
Agree totally. She isn’t credible, there is no supporting evidence. you can say she gave a somewhat convincing performance, but her story isn’t credible...
Just this morning we learn she lied about the year they did the remodeling https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/ford-caught-in-major-lie-city-remodeling-permits-show-project-she-linked-to-kavanaugh-was-in-2008-not-2012/
She Faked a disability to con the senate into delaying the hearing, she fake fear of flying.
Faking a disability to con people is a despicable act!
She has no credibility.
AMEN, Brother!
Too much acid in high school.
That was for consumption by the nincompoop soccer moms in suburbia ... and their girly-man spouses ...
They’re playing to female voters.
For political reasons Kavanaugh couldn’t say so (despite that bitch Booker’s taunting), but it is very clear she is a Dem agent. She probably had many encounters like that, but I have no reason to believe they weren’t consensual (as consensual as drunken co-ed mingling can be - by both parties), and I certainly have no reason to believe Kavanaugh was involved with them.
As I read from a tweet yesterday (about something unrelated no less) but it applies here:
Satan is worst when he is disguised as an Amgel of Light. Not when he is acting devilish.
And it takes spiritual clarity and discernment to see that...Which many in our country do not have because America has been dilly dallying with the enemy of our souls for so long.
Well, well. Good find.
Agreed. She hid and destroyed evidence.
Yup! I would advise her to seek further therapy cause she surely ain’t right. Like I asked before, was his nomination the trigger for her to come forward? His previous bench seat wasn’t an issue? It’s been six years since her counselor dragged this out of her. I know I heard yesterday they were in counseling over a disagreement over a home remodel project. Srsly. You need counseling for that? I guess some folks have zero problem resolution skills.
I didn’t watch the her whole testimony, but from what I saw she looked and sounded like a babbling idiot. Who paid for the polygraph? I don’t know. Was the polygraph recorded? Excessive babbling that never answered the question. Are you afraid to fly? Not when I’m going to Tahiti for vacation. She purposely did not answer any question that could provide specifics to the charge or leave her open to perjury charges (which would never happen anyway). It was all an orchestrated farce.
She’s credible only to the credulous.
I didn’t find her credible at all.
People are only saying that because she is donned in the armor of #metoo sensitivity. No one wants to ‘gang’ up on the poor defenseless victim.
He had way to many OBVIOUS memory problems. Those blaringly obvious memory lapses that people have under oath when they don’t want to provide potentially incriminating details.
She did the dance. That memory-lapse tap dance. It was repeated.
I don’t remember if there was a camera in the room. I don’t know if they were recording. He had a laptop so maybe.... DERP!
Bull!!!
You’re a professor and you’re not wet behind the ears. You are perfectly capable of navigating all things in your life and your career with your wits about you. WE KNOW YOU’RE NOT AN IDIOT. But you act like one.
There were only two types of people who buy into her credibility, and a third type that said they did but lied.
1) Those who wanted to so bad they suspended disbelief
2) Those who are are even more unintelligent than she made herself sound
Maybe it is an Erica Jong type fearnof flying..,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.