Posted on 09/19/2018 4:10:14 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
Cody Wilson, whose push to post blueprints for 3-D printed guns online has made him a key figure in the national gun control debate, was charged on Wednesday with sexually assaulting a child in Texas.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Statutory rape of a minor is closer to the true happening, but this is the New York Times....
Any headline to make someone who doesn’t follow the liberal anti-gun agenda is better....
Why didn’t Cody Wilson just use his printer to make a 3D teen age prostitute he could keep forever?
Problem solved.
The guy is an idiot but this reeks of a set up.
Little Miss Sugarbritches signs up on a site called ‘Sugar Daddies”, meets the guy gets paid for sex THEN reports it to her “counselor”
Yeah... Nothing ‘fishy” here, folks...
Any ‘bio’ pic she posted or any pics she may have sent to him via the ‘net-if any were of an underage person and of a sexual nature then it is automatically kiddie porn if the feds say so...
If this girl is a “child” at 17 years old, then Judge Kavanaugh was a “child” when he purportedly did what that other “child” claimed back in high school days...
Two “children” just playing....
Sent him nude photos of her underage self.
That is generating and transmitting.
.
The morally sinful part is acting as a member of “SugarDaddyMeet.com” And actually searching for underage girls.
The other sinful part is the Federal Government using this as a pretext for prior restraint.
[ A 16 year old “child” who consented...Still statutory, but “child”???? ]
I heard that Kavanaugh had sex with a girl who was under 26 years old ( cut off date for Obamacare parent’s heal insurance ) !!!!!
Kavanaugh had sex with a CHILD!!!!! ( according to Obamacare standards! )
[ If this girl is a “child” at 17 years old, then Judge Kavanaugh was a “child” when he purportedly did what that other “child” claimed back in high school days...
Two “children” just playing.... ]
Where in the hell are the girl’s parents????
Yep. Easy to set up someone too.
One of my pet peeves is people who call someone charged with that a “pedophile”. It may be illegal, but it trivializes real pedophilia.
Agreed. It's designed as a distinction without a purpose except for the sole purpose of sexual exploitation of a minor child.
We are still supposed to be a civilized society no matter what the perverts think or want.
Aka stupid!
They are delivering a message.
You go after oursexual predators we ll go after any body and everybody we choose and you can’t do a damn thing about it.
“Statutory rape of a minor is closer to the true happening, but this is the New York Times....”
BEST YOU get the facts first, then post.
There are apparently a lot of states in which the age of 16 is legal age of consent. Also all of Canada.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America
That is only if the pics are of sexual in nature and are actually of her.
We are assuming on that, we have no idea what picture she posted
Facts are she was 16, he is 30, he paid her $500 to meet at a motel room
This does not look good for him.
He should vet girls better, ask for her driver’s license.
Don’t go for girls under 21.
Common sense would have kept his butt out of jail
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.