Posted on 09/19/2018 4:10:14 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
Cody Wilson, whose push to post blueprints for 3-D printed guns online has made him a key figure in the national gun control debate, was charged on Wednesday with sexually assaulting a child in Texas.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
A 16 year old “child” who consented...Still statutory, but “child”????
Well he’s screwed.
If true he sure messed this one up.
“A 16 year old child who consented...Still statutory, but child????”
There is no law called “Sexual assault of a person that is slightly under age.”
age of consent in texas is 17. So Close and yet so far.
Whether it happened or not, the left always reverts to a sex crime to get their target.
Perhaps when making flight reservations, he confused Taiwan with Thailand.
No coincidence I’m sure.
I am guesing he was low hanging fruit to go after. it sounds like he is guilty but it also smells of a set up.
This is an awfully convenient development for the anti-gun forces.
Wouldn’t surprise me if he gets released on bail conditioned on that he can’t access a computer or do anything related to the 3D printing issue.
And as part of the anticipated plea deal he’ll promise to stop his activism and accept a misdemeanor for ‘bothering’ a child.
I say that because I seriously question the convenient timing of these charges.
The legal term is minor which describes anyone under the age of 18
This guy is a idiot
18+ year olds dude, 18+ year olds
What is the old saying ‘16 will get you 20.....’
Total setup, 100%.
It is 18 everywhere you go
Age of consent might be 17, but you can still be charged with endangering the welfare of a child...
A 16 year old "child" who advertised herself sexually on a site that is supposed to be "adults only"...
Cody Wilson is apparently not the brightest bulb, but he's not the only one at fault. Sadly, I doubt this "child" will suffer the slightest repercussion. I guess she felt guilty about taking $500 and then told her "counselor"?
At any rate, I doubt Mr. Wilson will be returning from abroad anytime soon...
she advertised on SugarDaddyMeet.com.
17 at the time
If she was “underage” she is guilty of creating/transmitting child porn
Travis county, Austin Texas.
So far, Im not buying this one.
.
Nah, he met a girl on a shady web site and paid her $500 cash to meet at a hotel.
Not a setup, just being really dumb
Reading the story, he found her on a website where she would have had to claim to be at least 18. Still stupid, but a little less so.
How is she guilty of creating and transmitting child porn?
He needs to say he is actually a female teacher, then he will be let go and everyone will high five him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.