BTTT.
I call BS. It’s a couple paragraphs past where permits are called for in the second amendment. Keep looking. Try over there near the collusion statues.
Obviously, he forgot to look in the penumbras.
There IS no such “right” in the Constitution. It MIGHT be in ONE of the EMANATIONS from the PENUMBRA! What a JOKE!
Vicious, fangtooth man-hating feminazis are foaming at the mouth.
The baby killing left will be apoplectic!
I’m warming up to him.
Elena Kagan: The ObamaCare Recusal That Wasn't ...Excerpt:
"...when in 2010 Obamacare passed and Ms. Kagan was {Obama's} solicitor general, Ms. Kagan viewed the passage as "simply amazing" and that she assigned a deputy in her office to help prepare legal defenses to any challenges to ObamaCare... she had in fact participated as "counselor or advisor" of the law when she was solicitor general, and she is clearly not impartial about the fate of ObamaCare."
Once again if not for their double standards Democrats would have no standards at all.
Or free healthcare, or welfare, or income tax, or, etc,etc,etc.
I'm sorry, but what importance do the Democrats think there is in a "commitment?" Didn't Obama say we could keep our doctors? Where was his commitment?
If Kavanaugh were to vote to overturn Roe v Wade...even if he "committed" not to...what can they do? It seems like childish theater to try and get him to make a "commitment." All Kavanaugh needs to say is "I evolved." isn't that what the Democrats always say when the break a promise?
Anyone ever hear the term “LIFE, Liberty, and Pursuit of happiness?
If the term, “Liberty”, means “abortion is a right”, then it also means that bank robbery is a right, homicide is a right,
and any other lawful, or lawless act, is covered by you having the “liberty” to do it.
That’s such bull$h/+.
“While most of the questioning has been from pro-abortion Democrats attempting to get Kavanaugh to agree that Roe, which allows virtually unlimited abortions up to birth, is “settled law” that can never be overturned, Graham took a different tact. And Kavanaugh, who tried to remain impartial and to merely refer what the Supreme Court has done, eventually confirm that no specific words exist creating a right to kill unborn babies in abortions. “
Didn’t these damned journos ever read the Roe case?
Roe doesn’t allow virtually unlimited abortions up to birth. In the third trimester, Roe held, states have a valid interest in protecting the potential for life, so could restrict abortions then.
The Roe case never said that there WAS a specific word that creates a right to abort. They learn it out from convoluted interpretations of the 9th Amendment, the penumbral rights theory, and the fact that up until the 1860s, there weren’t a lot of laws against abortions on the books in any state, so therefore at the time of the founding women had a greater right to abortion than they did in 1973.
There is no such thing as “settled law” that can never be overturned. Plessy vs. Ferguson was overturned. The second ‘flag salute’ case overturned the first one, which was decided the year before by the same court. Dredd Scott and Hirabayashi were at one point settled law, but are so obsolete that the circumstances that gave rise to them are unlikely to ever occur again. Precedents get overturned, even ‘well settled’ precedents. It shouldn’t be done willy nilly, but sometimes it must be done.
I’m neither a journo nor a lawyer, but even I know that much. If they want Roe v. Wade to never be overturned, amend the Constitution. Otherwise, shut the hell up. For that matter, constitutional amendments get overturned, too, which is why it’s legal to buy booze in a bar or liquor store today. Dumb article.
And this is news ...why?
You mean they didn’t know that??????
We are in serious trouble in the next few years. Nobody knows what’s in the Constitution!!!
Thankfully, Trump is POTUS and we have the majority when it comes to Supreme Court Justices.
They cant ask them to say they will vote a certain way on anything. This is unethical to make up your mind on something before its a case. Especially one that will likely come up before the court.
To wit, they made this very same objection when repubs have asked liberal appointees for a promise on an issue.
BOOKMARKED!
Wenow Kavanaugh is pro-life and we also know that there is nothing in the constitution that mentions abortion. But everyone also knows that his pro-life beliefs are the main force driving the Left's rabid opposition to him...seems odd that one on "our side" would stir them embers on purpose.
The World according to Garp.
The Constitution according to Harris and Feinstein.
Not much difference.
After all its a living breathing document subject to change whenever I want to rub my crotch penumbra./S
The left loses an election, loses the Supreme Court legislature,loses on the economy, loses on Foreign Affairs, wants to get rid of federal Law Enforcement, open the borders for free access,wants one set of laws for leftists and another for Republicans,and its time to amend the Constitution? The left wants to change The Constitution to The Restitution.
Eff them every single one!
PDJT needs to keep beating them like a drum! Mr. President, take them to the wood shed!
Even libtards admit there is no “specific” right to abortion. Instead they somehow apply an already contrived “right to privacy” to abortion.