For the Self-Appointed Posting Police (SAPP's) I already put the "alreadyposted" keyword in for you. I'm about to link to the other thread. This is a different source.
(including a link to your earlier thread)
Man accused of grabbing ‘MAGA’ cap, throwing drink in teen’s face indicted
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3683624/posts
another 4chan killshot:
They ID’ed this f*ggot in about 1 hour, disclosing his employer, home address with photos, etc.
Why say he “allegedly” did this when it’s on video????
Felony?
Seriously?
I wish people would learn how to shoot horizontal videos with their phones...
Original thread from back in July....
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3668715/posts?page=38
Employee Who Allegedly Attacked Teen Over MAGA Hat Fired From San Antonio Bar
Rumble, a San Antonio bar, fired a part-time employee after he was captured on
camera at Whataburger taking a 16-year-old’s “Make America Great Again” hat
and throwing a drink on the teen.
In a viral video posted on Twitter, a man standing next to a table is holding
the red hat and then picks up a soda and throws it at Hunter Richard, who was
in town visiting friends, My San Antonio reported.
“This is gonna go great in my f**king fireplace,” the man says as he walks out
of the restaurant.
Richards responds, “Alright, have fun with it.”
You need a grand jury to indict someone for assault?
Felony?
The world has changed. I can’t imagine why the teens didn’t kick his ass.
EXCERPTED - Language warning - NSFWFor the Self-Appointed Posting Police (SAPP's) I already put the "alreadyposted" keyword in for you. I'm about to link to the other thread. This is a different source.
LOL! I Will Post My Tribute To Our Own FR SAPPS
|
|
   |
 (Click The Pics & Text) |
The felony charge is there to make a point.
He needs to apologize, buy the kid a new hat, pay a lot of lawyer fees and a fine, get lectured by the Judge, and plead to a misdemeanor.
I would rather he not have a felony conviction and be able to keep working to support himself rather than take two years off to learn to be a criminal in the company of real felons and spend any portion of the rest of his life on taxpayer supported welfare.
When something has been clearly filmed, I find the term “alleged” to be insulting. It is a legal term, that’s all. The law says to be punished he must be proven guilty in a court of law.
It should be something like “Texas man filmed assaulting teen”.
Reporting that he is seen committing an action on film is not a court of law, it is a statement of fact. Two very different concepts.
Need to bring back stocks. That would work well for something like this.
Who exactly is the ‘niggah’ ?
Uppity Mex