Facebook has TRUST ratings for users – but it won’t tell you your score

The Sun UK ^ | 8-21-2018 | Sean Keach

[servo1969]

COMMUNIST 'SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE'

[DariusBane]

If falsebook is a primary news source for someone, that person is doing it wrong.

[lee martell]

Similar to what the RED Chinese are doing right now.

[dforest]

Pretty soon people will have to take the “mark of the beast” to prove they are trustworthy on Facebook. The what is next?

[servo1969]

Many big firms have dabbled in demanding prospective employees’ social media passwords so they can check for anything that may prove ‘unfortunate.’

How long before a person’s ‘trust rating’ determines whether they get hired?

Or get a loan?

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[pepsionice]

I think if they offered a button that you could turn off all news items....more than 80-percent of the public would opt for that.

[Mr. K]

Do they have a uniform dress code at Facebook?

It should be Brown Shirts.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Identical to what the ChiComs are doing.

Much of what they have in store for us has been tried and tested on the Great Firewall over the past decade.

I am not on Facebook. Anyone who is should be suing them for their “trust rating”.

[Buckeye McFrog]

If falsebook is a primary news source for someone, that person is doing it wrong.

News feeds from social media via smartphones is the near-exclusive source of information for most Millenials I know. That and The Daily Show.

[Nevadan]

So it sounds like anyone else can see the rating but the person? With all the trackers Facebook has it is probably hard to tell ones rating even if you are not logged into your account. Somebody enterprising individual ought to start a site. For a nominal fee, say $1 paid via PayPal have the site check the rating. Or ask a friend to do it. Anyway, compile the data of individuals who are being labeled as safe and those not and publicize the censorship. Easy to predict the results.

[Rebelbase]

“How long before a person’s ‘trust rating’ determines whether they get hired?”

That’s been going on for years. Take the resume, if it’s passable google the name and investigate social media.

[redfreedom]

I feel left out, as I do not have a “communist social credit score” as we do not have a Farcebook account.

I seriously wonder if those that have zero to do with Farcebook are blackballed in some way or another by the gov, some leftist organization?

Let’s face it, Farcebook and the modern smart phone are excellent ways to monitor just about anything anyone does.

[VTenigma]

I have a trust rating for Farcebook -0-

[ptsal]

Sounds like an element in the algorithm for a credit report.

Why does anyone have a FaceBook account?

Why is FakeBook keeping track of people who do NOT have accounts?

[WKUHilltopper]

This is the same crap they do in Red China. FUFascistBook

[minnesota_bound]

FTA: “The site, which sees 2.23billion users log on every single month”

I do not believe that number. They are making it up and also counting bots. No way out of a planets population of 7 billion that Facebook has that many real people using the website.

[DoughtyOne]

the concept of facebook and the practical applications it is used for creep me out

[PIF]

COMMUNIST ‘SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE’ where satire is listed as fake news ...

[PapaBear3625]

"For example, if someone previously gave us feedback that an article was false and the article was confirmed false by a fact-checker, then we might weight that person’s future false news feedback more than someone who indiscriminately provides false news feedback on lots of articles, including ones that end up being rated as true."

In other words, if the person's opinion is agreed with by SPLC (or whatever far-left organization they use to fact-check), then future flaggings are more likely to be accepted. But if SPLC disagrees, then they will ignore your future flaggings.