Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brennan considers legal action to stop clearance revocations
Associated Press ^ | Aug. 19, 2018 12:47 PM EDT | Jill Colvin and Lolita C. Baldor

Posted on 08/19/2018 11:53:58 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Former CIA Director John Brennan said Sunday that he is considering taking legal action to try to prevent President Donald Trump from stripping other current and former officials’ security clearances.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Brennan said he’s been contacted by a number of lawyers about the possibility of an injunction in the wake of Trump’s move to revoke his clearance and threaten nine others who have been critical of the president or are connected to the Russia probe.

“If my clearances and my reputation as I’m being pulled through the mud now, if that’s the price we’re going to pay to prevent Donald Trump from doing this against other people, to me it’s a small price to pay,” Brennan said. “So I am going to do whatever I can personally to try to prevent these abuses in the future. And if it means going to court, I will do that.” […]

Brennan’s legal warning came as other officials joined the growing chorus of critics — now more than 75 intelligence officials — denouncing Trump’s security clearance threats, saying they have a right to express their views on national security issues without fear of punishment. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brennan; jamesclapper; johnbrennan; leonpanetta; muslimconvert; securityclearance; susanrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Olog-hai

Johnboy is upset.

Express any views you want you communist POS.


21 posted on 08/19/2018 12:07:31 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

“But Rudy will tear him apart under oath.”

I’m guessing you watched Sunday Morning Futures this morning. Rudy was on and was almost salivating over the prospect of deposing Brennan.

I’ve been disposed before, a couple of times. I did well because I was honest, thorough and had nothing to hide.

I bet Brennan has a lot to hide...


22 posted on 08/19/2018 12:07:42 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

These people are idiots
“ now more than 75 intelligence officials — denouncing Trump’s security clearance threats, saying they have a right to express their views on national security issues without fear of punishment. …

WHO has stopped Brennan or anyone from talking?
the average person will recognize they do not need a SC to talk


23 posted on 08/19/2018 12:08:44 PM PDT by RWGinger (Does anyone else really)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redcatcherb412

I’ like to see the law that says you can have a security clearance forever.


24 posted on 08/19/2018 12:09:54 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“There is no “legal action” possible to stop executive action within the executive branch.”

Sure there is. All they need is a friendly judge to make life miserable for Trump, at least until such a case has exhausted its final appeal.


25 posted on 08/19/2018 12:09:55 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Perfect example of how the Swamp thinks we work for them...PDJT is sending the message we dont and they aint to happy about it.
But hey F’em


26 posted on 08/19/2018 12:10:18 PM PDT by Bell Bouy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Thanks; maybe I should have said “lack of actions”. Supposedly good men doing nothing.


27 posted on 08/19/2018 12:10:39 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

sounds like panic. sounds like we might have found a deep state weakness—> remove clearances


28 posted on 08/19/2018 12:11:18 PM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

That “freedom of speech” argument connected to security clearances is strange. How are the two even related? Brennan can go out and disrespect President Trump the same as he had been. Jerking that clearance away sure made Brennan and angrier blabber mouth.


29 posted on 08/19/2018 12:12:57 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for President Trump, his family and Devin Nunes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I agree.


30 posted on 08/19/2018 12:13:43 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good luck with it.

A security clearance is a privilege, not an entitlement.

And its issued only on a need-to-know basis.

Brennan is an ex-government official so there’s no need for him to have it.

But if he wants to waste his money on a frivolous lawsuit, let him go ahead.


31 posted on 08/19/2018 12:14:44 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

In photos, why does he always have the exact same ugly grimace on his face? He literally looks like he’s been constipated for a month and is trying to pass a bowel movement.


32 posted on 08/19/2018 12:14:52 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

His only worry now is; will the sentence be life or death.


33 posted on 08/19/2018 12:14:58 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Discovery will be interesting.


34 posted on 08/19/2018 12:16:29 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

.
No need for the President to heed a judge ruling out of venue.

The only judicial action against a president is impeachment.

He cannot be subpoenaed to any court.

He cannot be enjoined by any motion for joinder.

Only the house of representatives by majority vote can summon a president.


35 posted on 08/19/2018 12:18:34 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Did not see Rudy this morning.
Thanks for recap.


36 posted on 08/19/2018 12:18:49 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Good luck with it. A security clearance is a privilege, not an entitlement.

Clearly, you don't understand "The Democrat Way."

Ask whichever parent (branch of government) that will say "yes."

If that doesn't work, make sure all their friends (media) know how unfair they are for not giving you what you want.

37 posted on 08/19/2018 12:22:13 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“No need for the President to heed a judge ruling out of venue.”

In theory, but not in reality. A judge could issue an injunction against Trump preventing him from removing anyone else’s security clearance, and it’s unlikely Trump would defy it.


38 posted on 08/19/2018 12:24:38 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well I think a security clearance would be cool to have. I’m gonna sue the government until I get a security clearance. YOU get a security clearance! YOU get a security clearance! EVERYONE gets a security clearance!!

Mr. Brennan, facing a future as a bank security guard, is scrambling to keep his high paying job. Nothing more.


39 posted on 08/19/2018 12:27:37 PM PDT by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

“I’ like to see the law that says you can have a security clearance forever.”

Don’t you know?

It’s one of those inalienable rights just like abortions on demand, driving, and voting multiple times each election. /sarc


40 posted on 08/19/2018 12:29:48 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson