Posted on 08/07/2018 5:17:31 AM PDT by C19fan
The New York Times said it vetted her social-media history before Sarah Jeong was hired last week, which means the newspaper was presumably aware of her Trump is Hitler tweets.
In addition to firing off anti-white and anti-cop missives, Ms. Jeong, the latest member of the newspapers editorial board, repeatedly equated Donald Trump to Adolph Hitler on Twitter leading up to the 2016 presidential election.
Her account included declarations such as Trump is Hitler, Trump = Hitler, and trump is basically hitler, as well as Was Hitler as rapey as Donald Trump?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Slime sold out his NYT holdings?
“If Trump is Hitler who is Mueller?”
John Brown.
If Trump were hitler, the Ameritrash bitch would be dead
So, to top off that fact that this person is an imbecilic racist, now she is a Holocaust denier. After all, there are no state-sponsored attacks upon a particular ethnic group, there are no people being rounded up by the government for no other reason than their ethnicity or political opposition, there are no people being beaten and/or starved to death on their way to concentration camps, there are no hideous medical experiments being done by the government to anyone, nor are any people being mass exterminated - nor did Donald Trump order any of those things to be done. If Trump is Hitler, then Hitler never ordered any of those things, either, nor were they carried out.
But Hitler DID order those things, and they DID occur...so this racist bitch is, in fact, a Holocaust denier.
“If Trump is Hitler who is Mueller?”
Well, she’s at least brain-dead.
Embattled??? Sarah Jeong has the most secure job in America! Does anyone think that the NY Times would fire her? She is a hero to their readers. Jeong will probably be made Editor one day.
To understand the tactics of Hitler & the American 'wanttobe':
We already knew, but it is good to have confirmation.
The reality is that she was hired, not IN SPITE of her genocidal, white-hating, racist ass, but BECAUSE of it.
The New York Times is a racist hate group.
At some point, in a rationale society, this “woman” would be ashamed...her educators would retract her “degrees” and she would disappear into the middle of another country. BUT, NO...she sees this as her 15 minutes of fame...well enjoy it, idiot.
We already knew, but it is good to have confirmation.
The reality is that she was hired, not IN SPITE of her genocidal, white-hating, racist ass, but BECAUSE of it.
The New York Times is a racist hate group.
Stealing
Was Hitler as rapey as Bill Clinton?
She claims to be oppressed. UC Berkeley, Harvard Law - if that is how America oppresses South Korean immigrants, it is the greatest nation on Earth.
The NYT is losing money every year. So the subsidizing of this ‘media outlet’ is clearly serving a special interest which is willing to keep paying for the mouthpiece to push their agenda. Filth tends to rise to the top of the fen like turds in a nasty pool, as a layer of detritus like this ‘reporter’.
“This woman is basically a racist imbecile.”
no wonder the NYT was so eager to hire her ...
not so much telling about this leftist, but the more about the paper who would employ her
“leftist media are the enemy of the people” - no truer words have been spoken
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.