They sent him a stern letter? And it had no effect????
Shocking.
Pff. FBI “Rules” are worth zero, especially when upper-level executives are involved. They use them for toilet paper, and use the FBI as their personal property.
Who in reality was working for who?
Who is being charged? Right! No one. Business as usual.
Who gave First Lady Hillary boxes of FBI files on her enemies?
Say what.... FBI Rules ???
I thought this was a nation of LAWS.
FBI r-u-l-e-s are super secret and changed on a whim, IMHO.
I read this story at another source last night - I can’t recall where, maybe Judicial Watch, maybe The Daily Caller?
Anyway, the “Admonishment” is actually a scheduled annual meeting between every FBI confidential source and the FBI agent who supervises that source.
In other words, it’s like the annual meeting we all have with our own employers to get a refresher course on sexual harassment laws, etc., etc.
So, it’s unlikely that Christopher Steele was actually “admonished” for a specific violation at that meeting.
However - from memory - Steele violated the news leak prohibition like two months after his Admonishment review, so he clearly can’t plead ignorance of his agreement.