Posted on 07/12/2018 9:20:04 AM PDT by deplorableindc
FBI official Peter Strzok testified defiantly on Thursday that he was not biased while investigating 2016 election candidates, but said at the same time that he disapproved of then-candidate Donald Trump's "horrible, disgusting behavior."
Strzok won applause from Democrats during a joint hearing of the House oversight and judiciary committees after offering an explanation for an August 2016 text message to then-FBI attorney Lisa Page that "we'll stop" Trump from being president.
"I think its important when you look at those texts that you understand the context in which they were made and the things that were going on across America," Strzok testified.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
I guess it depends on what the definition of “bias” is. The left loves to redefine words and terms to suit their agenda.
untouchable - maybe in this moment in our country, but at some point he will be dealt with appropriately. what’s that the bible says about pride, haughty spirit, intentions out of line with God and His word and plans?
To the Deep State Swamp, wanting to hold them accountable is “horrible, disgusting behavior.” They are special and entitled to do there thing and answer to nobody but their own kind.
Strzok denies bias.
O.J. denies killing Nicole.
Bill Clinton denies having oral sex with Monica Lewinski.
Hilary Clinton denies wiping out her subpoenaed emails.
Democrats lie, cheat, and steal. It is what they do. Delay, deny, attack. It is all they have. They cant tell the truth and survive it.
Lock him up!
Well said.
Just spent some time watching it. Horrifying. The democrats are obstructing the investigation. Point of order after point of order... what are they so afraid of. Sickening. Traitors and criminals... all of them.
The Democratic Party needs an enema.
No, Strzok said he denies “by us” and “buy us”.
As of now none of the corrupt and arrogant FBI officials seem to fear anything from Congress. Until that changes... there will be no different behavior. Could be a purpose of the Mueller “investigation” is to allow the refusal to answer due to the “ongoing investigation”. The other being to harass and persecute Trump supporters with “lawfare” indictments.
I wonder is Trump is OK with it... in that politically the more the FBI and Democrats in Congress are shown corrupt and arrogant to American people, the more Trump gains politically. It is indeed hard to take the brazen arrogance of these Deep State reptiles.
Seditious...(Then we get to use guns)
“I wonder is Trump is OK with it”
I wonder that every day with respect to those agencies that are under his direct control, but are working at crossed purposes to his policies and presidency. I just hope he has a plan that will, in the end, snare all of the criminals in the FBI, DOJ, and DOS for openers. Because if these people are successful in getting away with their crimes, it will only be a matter of time before we have another RAT administration, and when that happens, it will be essentially over for America and it’s Constitution!
Watch the House Un-American Activities Committee hearings of the 1940s. Same exact dog-and-pony show with the accused turning the proceedings into a circus to try to score political points. The commies always utilize the same playbook.
How about asking him about him OWN behavior — carrying on an adulterous workplace affair about 23 hour a day.
It’s a hoot that Strzok’s “defense” is to assert that bias was justified — and the Democrat’s applaud that. Sort of like the “well, he needed killin” murder defense.
Surprise—GOP feckless idiots—they could screw up a one man parade!
Does anyone know? Do we have an AG????
This is an absolute CIRCUS! I hope the American people grow stronger against these terrible people who continue to be re-elected to Congress! What an abject disgrace!
Oh ye of little faith
Why do you think the President is stupid?
...he is demon possessed
Or led. The whole lot of them.
I only wish that Gowdy would have asked him if he believed he is an honorable person? If he is an honest man? If he ever gave false testimony or made false certifications in relation to his position. Set him up for questions about his work schedule and his personal text messages. It is unbelievable how many messages they exchanged. I would be interested if he used vacation or personal leave on his timesheets for his personal texting activities. Failing to do so could be considered acts of fraud.
“Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.