Posted on 07/12/2018 4:43:57 AM PDT by deks
Agent will testify before Congress [at 10:00 a.m. today, July 12] on anti-Trump text messages that cast a cloud over bureaus Russia and Clinton probes.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
He was, possibly still is, committing sedition. Blackmailable was a given.
The eyewatering bad optics of a Feeb taking the fifth.
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
Do you recall...?
No, I don’t recall...
*BUMP FOR LATER*
Congressional hearings are where cases go to “Die”. Reps bluster. Dems blather. Nothing comes out after the hearing. All go home and get paid.
How many cameras, how many pictures can they take? Soooooo stupid.
I think he takes the 5th as well. A big NOTHING once again.
Sounds good to me!
Exactly. Congressional investigations are political theater, bad theater at that.
No kidding. They look like idiots taking so many pictures of him.
Another gigantic waste of our taxpayer dollars. WHERE ARE THE INDICTMENTS?
Lot’s of smiles in the room.
Here’s a transcript of how this will go: “On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections.” Repeat as necessary.
I agree.
I mean... look at that picture of her. What normal male could be attracted to THAT?
No normal male.
Since it was already here, it made sense.
BREAK HIS SILENCE????
I wish the bastid had been silenced long ago.
I’m fine with that.
If he takes the 5th, and Sessions doesn’t immediately fire him, that will be absolute proof that the “Trust Sessions” crowd is comlplete disinformation.
Of course, they’ll still have an excuse. They always do. Too much invested personally in their game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.