[762X51]

Here’s a transcript of how this will go: “On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections. On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections.” Repeat as necessary.

[TexasGunLover]

On the advice of my legal counsel I decline to answer the question citing my 5th Amendment protections.

Will be interesting, I suspect, because of the way the deep state works, he's no more at risk than Hillary or Muller of being charged with a crime.

[Basket_of_Deplorables]

If he takes the 5th, and Sessions doesn’t immediately fire him, that will be absolute proof that the “Trust Sessions” crowd is comlplete disinformation.

Of course, they’ll still have an excuse. They always do. Too much invested personally in their game.