Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Rosenstein asks prosecutors to help review Kavanaugh documents
Axios ^ | 11 Jul 2018 | Khorri Atkinson

Posted on 07/11/2018 4:41:43 PM PDT by mandaladon

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has asked the offices of all 93 U.S. attorneys to each provide up to three federal prosecutors to assist the Justice Department in reviewing government records of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the New York Times reports, citing a letter it obtained.

Why it matters: The Times notes that this is an unusual move because department attorneys are not typically responsible for carrying out such a task. "The production of documents could slow down a confirmation hearing that has already shaped up as a sharp partisan battle. Democratic lawmakers say they want to inspect all of Judge Kavanaugh’s documents, including his staff work and over 300 opinions he has issued as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit," the report notes.

Show less What they're saying: Former law enforcement officials told the Times that Rosenstein's request is troubling.

"It’s flat-out wrong to have career federal prosecutors engaged in a political process like the vetting of a Supreme Court nominee. It takes them away from the mission they’re supposed to be fulfilling, which is effective criminal justice enforcement," Christopher Hunter, a former F.B.I. agent and federal prosecutor for almost 11 years, told the publication.

But Michael Zubrensky, a former Justice Department lawyer who oversaw the agency's Office of Legal Policy, said Kavanaugh's long paper trail could be the reason for Rosenstein's request. Sarah Isgur Flores, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, told the Times that prosecutors have been used in the past to vet Supreme Court nominees. "[T]he scope of the production of executive branch documents we’ve been asked for is many, many times as large," she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at axios.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; brettkavanaugh; election2018; election2020; jamescomey; kavanaugh; lisabarsoomian; maga; michaelcohen; michaelzubrensky; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; presidenttrump; rodrosenstein; sarahisgurflores; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: mandaladon
Rat senators have requested all these records. Yes its BS but they have a right to do so. The records need to be reviewed for confidential and classified information. By assigning a host of attorneys to process these records, he will get it done more quickly, which will be good for Kavanaugh.

Rosenstein is doing Trump a favor here.

41 posted on 07/11/2018 5:39:54 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

FBI is short for Gestapo


42 posted on 07/11/2018 5:44:15 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Is that the face one makes when castrated?


43 posted on 07/11/2018 5:44:59 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

That’s the face of self recusal.

Swamp Weasel.


44 posted on 07/11/2018 5:47:00 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Sessions should be firing Rosenstein. This has nothing to do with Russian investigation and therefore Session is not rescused from it.


45 posted on 07/11/2018 5:47:03 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Hey Rottenstein: YOU’RE FIRED


46 posted on 07/11/2018 5:55:26 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

[ Yo, Trump? Strap on a pair, and do what’s needed at DOJ. Unless watching Americans get screwed over was part of your plan. ]

What if it is his position that is so tenuous that he is waiting for us to show him OUR support????


47 posted on 07/11/2018 6:03:01 PM PDT by GraceG ("WWG1WGA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

It’s the face you make when your wife finds out.


48 posted on 07/11/2018 6:03:54 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Why is Eisenstein still there?

It is unbelievable it is taking them this long to impeach him and hold him in contempt.


49 posted on 07/11/2018 6:08:59 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Where the hell is Sessions?

Is Rosentein running everything?
WTF


50 posted on 07/11/2018 6:20:59 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Is he just loafing around, taking a vacation, practicing his golf?


51 posted on 07/11/2018 6:25:35 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/11/barr-unseal-the-clinton-impeachment-files-now/


52 posted on 07/11/2018 6:27:35 PM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Rosenstein is assisting Sessions in draining the swamp.
This move means nothing and has happened to other SCOTUS nominations as well. “

You are deranged. If you read the article, in the past, a few hundred to a few thousand ( as in two ) pages of info were supplied by the DOJ, not TWO MILLION PAGES of documents. This is obviously meant to drag on the confirmation beyond the mid-terms.


53 posted on 07/11/2018 6:35:47 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: heights

2 million pages holy crap!


54 posted on 07/11/2018 6:36:46 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“Did RR do these same vetting processes for the unwise Latina and Kagan??”

In those instances, a few hundred to two thousand pages of documents were collected by the DOJ. In this case, Rosenstein is taking Two Million pages of documents.


55 posted on 07/11/2018 6:38:40 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You’re an ass. Almost as bad as John McCain.


56 posted on 07/11/2018 6:39:31 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The New York Times is so openly dishonest, even their crossword puzzles lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Rosenstein IS a Deep State swamp dweller, and Sessions is his b####.

Or did you forget the /sarc tag?


57 posted on 07/11/2018 6:57:39 PM PDT by piytar (If it was not for double standards, the Democrats and the left would have NO standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

How do we know story true?


58 posted on 07/11/2018 6:59:54 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You’re lying or stupid or both.

A large team of federal prosecutors has NEVER been called in to vet or investigate a SCOTUS nominee.

Even the New York Times, whose sympathies mirror your own, admits as much. Fool.


59 posted on 07/11/2018 7:03:42 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Rosenstein is sticking his thumb in the eye of Congress. He is saying that if they want to play hardball over documents, he will show them who really has the power. As in threatening to subpoena congressional aides, or gum up the works with an avalanche of documents. He gets to tweak the president’s nose, show up Sessions, and in general thumb his nose at Congress. And all with no fear of contradiction — just helping them do their oversight, dontcha know?


60 posted on 07/11/2018 7:06:11 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson