Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems grasp for way to stop pick
The Hill ^ | 07/10/18 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 07/10/2018 5:19:19 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Democrats went on the attack Tuesday against President Trump’s new pick for the Supreme Court, but acknowledged they are unlikely to win the war.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has focused his party’s offensive on the risks that a conservative court could pose to abortion rights and affordable health care, while other Democrats labeled Brett Kavanaugh an “extreme” pick whom Trump was motivated to nominate as protection from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) defended Kavanaugh as thoroughly qualified and deserving confirmation.

“Judge Kavanaugh possesses an impressive résumé, an outstanding legal mind and an exemplary judicial temperament,” he said.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said he expects Kavanaugh to receive a vote on the floor 65 to 70 days from now, in keeping with recent Senate precedent, and for his panel to hold confirmation hearings around Labor Day.

Democrats are calling for more time, citing the millions of documents they need to review from Kavanaugh’s time as White House staff secretary under former George W. Bush and his 12-year record on the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals.

But Grassley says he’s not going to deviate much from the timeline used for Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first nominee.

A handful of Democrats and Republicans are potential swing votes and are coming under heavy pressure from both sides. It’s a much harder decision for Democrats facing reelection in states that Trump carried by large margins in 2016, reflected by their dogged efforts to dodge reporters’ questions on Tuesday.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) kept her cellphone glued to her ear whenever she walked through public hallways, making it impossible for journalists to ask her about Kavanaugh’s record.

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) pleaded that he was losing his voice and urged one reporter for The New York Times to “look at my statement.”

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) bolted from the Capitol out of the first floor exit instead of taking the Senate subway, where most reporters camp out.

The Judicial Crisis Network announced Monday evening that it would launch a $1.4 million cable and digital ad campaign to pressure Democrats in the red states of Alabama, Indiana, North Dakota and West Virginia to back the nominee.

Senate Democrats admitted it will be difficult to defeat Kavanaugh with only 49 seats in their caucus, but their goal is to inflict as much political damage on the GOP as possible ahead of the November midterm elections.

“We have to lower the expectations of our base. We can’t defeat the nominee on our own,” said a Democratic senator who requested anonymity to discuss internal party deliberations.

“If they keep all their votes together, there’s nothing we can do,” a Senate Democratic aide said of the Republican leadership’s effort to keep its conference unified.

The aide also noted that Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have been careful to “sound positive” about Kavanaugh but have emphasized it’s still early in the process.

Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said if Republicans stick together, the chances of defeating Kavanaugh are “very low.”

But he says that could change as the committee begins to dig more deeply into his record and a “range of Republicans will feel pressure from their states” to oppose the nominee.

Democratic leaders see the rising cost of health care as one of their best campaign issues heading into the midterms and want to play it up by warning the Supreme Court could threaten protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions.

Their goal is to keep the Senate Democratic Caucus unified as long as possible in hopes of putting more pressure on Republican swing votes.

That’s a big reason why Schumer is making Kavanaugh’s past criticism of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) one of his top arguments for defeating him.

“Judge Kavanaugh has argued that the Supreme Court should question the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “He openly criticized the Supreme Court when they upheld the law. He’s no neutral arbiter.”

Democratic leaders believe the focus on health-care affordability is the best way to keep red-state moderates from defecting.

The strategy appears to be having an influence on one key swing vote: Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia, a state Trump carried by 42 points and who is a big GOP target this fall.

Manchin says he’s concerned how Kavanaugh may rule on federal protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions, a pillar of the ACA.

“The Supreme Court will ultimately decide if nearly 800,000 West Virginians with pre-existing conditions will lose their healthcare. This decision will directly impact almost 40 percent of my state, so I’m very interested in his position on protecting West Virginians with pre-existing conditions,” Manchin said in a statement.

Manchin, along with Heitkamp and Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), all backed Gorsuch last year.

Four Democrats in 2006 supported Kavanaugh’s nomination to his current post on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Sen. Tom Carper (Del.) and former Sens. Ben Nelson (Neb.), Mary Landrieu (La.) and Robert Byrd (W.Va.).

Democrats this week have attacked Kavanaugh on many fronts, criticizing him as someone who would be overly deferential to Trump’s presidential powers and hostile to gun control measures.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, criticized Kavanaugh for ruling in a 2011 case that the Second Amendment established a right to own semi-automatic firearms.

“He argued in 2011 against Washington, D.C.’s ban because weapons like AR-15s are in ‘common use,’ ” she noted.

Schumer has vowed to the party’s liberal base that he will do everything he can to stop Kavanaugh, but to be successful he needs to convince at least one Republican to cross the aisle.

Their two most likely prospects are Collins and Murkowski, who support abortion rights. Both lawmakers opposed efforts by GOP leaders last year to defund Planned Parenthood, a major provider of family-planning services in their states.

Yet, Republicans appear confident they will be united on Kavanaugh.

On Tuesday, The Boston Globe cast doubt on Collins breaking with the GOP by publishing an analysis that she has voted for judicial nominees put forward by Republican presidents nearly 99 percent of the time. The media outlet reviewed more than 500 of her votes on nominees for the Supreme Court, circuit courts of appeal, district courts and other judicial appointments.

Democrats on Tuesday began building a case against Kavanaugh that he cannot be trusted to uphold Roe v. Wade or defend reproductive rights in general. They zeroed in on Kavanaugh’s rulings in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services after it prevented an unaccompanied pregnant teenager who was detained crossing the Texas border from visiting an abortion clinic.

Kavanaugh wrote in a dissenting opinion to Garza v. Hargan that “the government has permissible interests in favoring fetal life, protecting the best interests of a minor and refraining from facilitating abortion.”

Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), the highest-ranking woman in the Democratic leadership, warned that “a vote for President Trump’s Judge Kavanaugh is a vote to go back to the days when women had to go into back alleys for health care.”

That tough rhetoric could boomerang and spark awkwardness in the caucus if red-state Democrats end up voting for Kavanaugh.

But the abortion-focused tactics do not appear to be moving Collins or Murkowski, who on Tuesday said they would keep an open mind about the nominee.

“I think the judge has impressive credentials,” Collins said. “I obviously want the opportunity to sit down with him one-on-one and to get a better sense of his judicial philosophy.”

Murkowski said she would not make any quick decisions.

“There’s a lot to look at with Judge Kavanaugh,” she said. “I’m going to be able to give you more of a reaction after I’ve had an opportunity for more thorough review.”

Collins and Murkowski did not voice any concerns or opposition when the GOP conference discussed Kavanaugh with Vice President Pence at a private lunch Tuesday, according to a lawmaker who attended the meeting.

The GOP lawmaker who requested anonymity predicted that both moderates will end up voting for Kavanaugh.

Another potential Republican swing vote is libertarian Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has privately expressed concern about what he sees as Kavanaugh’s weak position on Fourth Amendment–related privacy issues.

Paul on Tuesday said, “I’m keeping an open mind, and we’ll follow the process.”

Schumer says that Democrats will also emphasize Kavanaugh’s expressions of support for broad presidential authorities, such as his 2009 article in the Minnesota Law Review arguing that sitting presidents should not be subject to criminal investigations and civil lawsuits while in office.

“He is almost certainly the one who would most yield to presidential power, to say that if a president deems a law unconstitutional he doesn’t have to obey it,” Schumer said. “That’s dangerous at any time, but it’s particularly dangerous when Donald Trump is president.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brettkavanaugh; democrats; maga; presidenttrump; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/10/2018 5:19:19 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Dems grasp for way to stop pick

They're grasping at straws.

2 posted on 07/10/2018 5:21:50 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Buy a Nuke from Russia and set it off in DC ?


3 posted on 07/10/2018 5:24:09 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Fake witnesses to come.


4 posted on 07/10/2018 5:27:20 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Sound and Fury, signifying nothing.
5 posted on 07/10/2018 5:28:19 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Yes the Anita Hill plan is about to be put into effect. You just know it’s coming.


6 posted on 07/10/2018 5:29:12 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Yes the Anita Hill plan is about to be put into effect. You just know it’s coming.

><

“Someone has seen him peeking into his daughter’s team’s locker or showers”.


7 posted on 07/10/2018 5:31:15 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Schumer and the dhimmicrats really should have fielded a presidential candidate in 2016 that had a chance of winning…if they didn’t want strict constructionists picked for the court.

Life’s a b**ch Chuckie.


8 posted on 07/10/2018 5:35:25 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Maybe they can do a mass self immolation on the Capitol lawn.

That’ll show Trump, don’t you think?


9 posted on 07/10/2018 5:38:49 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

” risks that a conservative court could pose to abortion rights and affordable health care”

If Roe v Wade were overturned tomorrow, Congress could enact similar legislation the next day. But the American people would oppose that, and they know it. Tyrants.


10 posted on 07/10/2018 5:42:13 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), the highest-ranking woman in the Democratic leadership, warned that “a vote for President Trump’s Judge Kavanaugh is a vote to go back to the days when women had to go into back alleys for health care.”

Remember Patty Murray the mom "who wore tennis shoes"?

How about Patty Murray the "wannabe birth mother who aborted a baby"?

11 posted on 07/10/2018 5:45:42 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (All Democrats have to offer is violence, intolerance, divisiveness and hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

What??? No “He’s worse that Hitler” from the Dems? I’m disappointed.


12 posted on 07/10/2018 5:47:21 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
I am sure the dims will find someone who claimed Kavanaugh touched her inappropriately in a third grade cloak room, or someone who saw someone that looked like him, at a college, pro-Reagan rally.

All the usual absurd $#!t they come up with is bound to be in the lsm soon.

13 posted on 07/10/2018 5:50:41 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Remember Patty Murray the mom "who wore tennis shoes"?

Don't forget Osama bin Laden's children's day care business.

14 posted on 07/10/2018 5:54:39 PM PDT by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

They should hire the “Russians” who somehow parlayed $50,000 in Facebook ads for a win against Hillary’s $2 billion dollars.


15 posted on 07/10/2018 5:54:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The Democrats wouldn’t have to panic like this if the Constitution actually stated that women had the right to kill their babies until their expected due date. But of course, the Founders would never have done that, so Justice Blackmun concocted the “right” to abortion. Justices today have no obligation to honor precedent for an unconstitutional “law” fabricated by the SCOTUS.


16 posted on 07/10/2018 5:55:48 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) kept her cellphone glued to her ear whenever she walked through public hallways, making it impossible for journalists to ask her about Kavanaugh’s record.

The old fake cellphone call trick....

17 posted on 07/10/2018 5:58:59 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Manchin says he’s concerned how Kavanaugh may rule on federal protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions, a pillar of the ACA.”

Why the heck would this make his
nomination a deciding factor, when
the only thing that got the ACA
passed, was from a turncoat SCOTUS
judge who ruled the mandate was a tax?
The pre-existing conditions clause
would not exist except for the passing
of this nightmare legislation.


18 posted on 07/10/2018 6:01:52 PM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Manchin says he’s concerned how Kavanaugh may rule on federal protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions, a pillar of the ACA.”

Why the heck would this make his
nomination a deciding factor, when
the only thing that got the ACA
passed, was from a turncoat SCOTUS
judge who ruled the mandate was a tax?
The pre-existing conditions clause
would not exist except for the passing
of this nightmare legislation.


19 posted on 07/10/2018 6:01:54 PM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lean-Right

Who got the “tax idea” from Kavanaugh himself.


20 posted on 07/10/2018 6:12:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson