The author is full of himself.
The only thing that could make this article worth less, would be adding the word “sources” to “anonymous”.
Pass...
One could argue Congress has a compelling interest in outlawing abortion since the average baby murder will cost the Social Security system ~$200,000 in revenue.
Kavanaugh is an ancient name, and if he is anything like his ancestors, the left is in for a huge surprise.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caomh%C3%A1nach
Kavanaugh isn’t going to reverse Hobby Lobby.
I’m not Catholic, but the position of the Catholic Church and its institutions with regard to birth control products must be respected 100%.
A Muslim cab driver doesn’t have to drive someone to a liquor store either.
.... and Hillary’s pick would be the opposite.
Anonymous? Wasn’t that Larry David’s pseudonym?
The fact that this post has to be written anonymously tells you the kind of nasty campaign DC-types are running ogsinst Kavanaugh. Just an observation.
Over half of Kavanaugh clerks have been female.
Just because something is in the written record shouldn’t be held unmercifully against him.
I listened to Ben Shapiro and Glen Beck dissect the SCOTUS pick on the radio today. They were both okay with him. Shapiro commented that Kavanaugh wrote very narrow opinions that just dealt with the case and he did not legislate from the bench like liberals did. Was the law constitutional or not? That’s the question. Was it properly applied? If peripheral issues were involved but did not impact the case, he does not rule on them.
Now, having said that, Shapiro pointed out that justices who get to sit on the top court often expand their views. He pointed out that justices appointed by liberals never go conservative. Justices appointed by Republicans, however, are about 50/50 after they get onto the court. Both Beck and Shapiro thought Kavanaugh a good pick even if he wasn’t their first choice.
It’d be more interesting if the author had the guts to give his/her own name. Anonymous doesn’t cut it.
What a blowhard this author is.
I think Kavanaugh is a bit of a mixed bag. He looks like he’ll be good in preferring not to legislate from the bench. But he seems shakier on protecting/knocking down violations of our Constitutional rights. Yes, he seems good on the Second Amendment, but he also seems a little weak on the First and Fourth Amendments. I’m not sure how he is on the Tenth Amendment either, which was actually something that Kennedy was typically strongly on. That he didn’t see Obamacare as a violation of the Tenth Amendment and a federal overreach doesn’t look like a good sign in that regard. At least his record looks better than Kennedy’s overall.
Jay Sekulow said today that Kavanaugh sided with his American Center for Law and Justice on a religious liberty case, so I’m not buying the handwringing and pearl clutching by some on the right.
I want Supreme Court justices who pi$$ off both Democrat and Republican idealogues.
“Potential Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Has A Troubling Record On Religious Liberty”
well, hell, in that case, Trump should dump him and nominate Merrick Garland!
In-depth effort to queer support for Trump by “analyzing” Kavanaugh...