Posted on 06/26/2018 5:06:15 PM PDT by Pollard
In one ruling, the Supreme Court has delivered two major victories to President Trump. The first victory is obvious: Trump v. Hawaii validates the President’s broad authority to restrict entry of specified foreign nationals into the United States when the President finds such entry is “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”
What does this mean? It means, as I have argued, that President Trump’s “travel ban” limiting immigration from Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Chad, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen is constitutional. It means that President Trump does have the authority, despite the open-borders howls of liberals and illegal alien activists, to secure our citizens against threats posed by foreign nationals from dysfunctional states. It is a good ruling, and one that will help President Trump keep this nation safe, secure, and protected.
But Trump v. Hawaii is a decision with a less obvious meaning too. The Supreme Court has just laid the foundation for the Border Wall that the President and I want to build along the US-Mexico border. Trump v. Hawaii, in fact, provides a roadmap to “Build The Wall!”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I like the sound of that.
Sure works for me.
Can’t disagree with Rep. King
And what the Marxist Mexican president who will be elected this weekend is advocating will do for the wall what Obama did for gun sales.
The Wall will be built.
Wall = land blockade.
Trump must know he holds ALL the cards now. He’s going to wait til the judge says he can’t hold kids more than 20 days, then he’s going to say we have a crisis - no more border crossovers until we get a wall.
Now, it feels like it should...they ain't as cocky recently.
With the next mehican president promising to open the floodgates, this is a very good SC ruling. That new presidente won’t assume office until Dec 2018 and by then, Trump will have done so much winning, most of the left ought to be in mental institutions recovering - or babbling for real.
No country can long exist without secure borders.
A rational immigration scheme can only be put in place after the election later this year.
‘Bout time.
Thomas sure knows how to hit the nail on the head. Thanks for printing it out!
Two more conservative justices on the SCOTUS would certainly stop some of this malarkey!
Yep, that’s the money quote right there.
Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
right again. Steve, i wish you were speaker. thank you again for all you do and all you and Michele did as part of the great tea party tag team of Bachmann and King in Congress.
If the Mexican president keeps his word, the democrat party will be finished. Democrats cannot continue advocating open borders and expect to keep blacks and blue collar whites in the party.
The Court’s ruling is especially timely since the future President of Mexico just instructed all people in Mexico and Central America that it is their obligation to invade the US and promised to help them do so.
That’s great, boycott! And when we get two more SC judges on the bench, we’ll have enough clout to get rid of these universal injunctions.
Come on dude in the black hoodie with a scythe, you know RBG is pretty ripened..lol
You are right. It all adds up to building the Wall and Republican gains this fall.
I hope the Mexican Marxist doesn’t lay low until after Nov.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.