Posted on 06/24/2018 4:59:51 PM PDT by kiryandil
|
Come at me. See what happens. NB
The child doesn’t understand that his proposal for murdering the surrendering Southern soldiers would have been a recipe for vicious and merciless guerilla warfare, involving the slaughter of women and children on both sides.
There are plenty of guns in Northern California.
Plenty.
Skin that smokewagon, and see what happens.
you should teach your child the consequences of treason
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says secession is not allowed?
The scrawny, scrabbling, lying Lincoln wasn’t fit to shine General Lee’s boots.
no. Why would I. The losers took their best shot and they lost their slaves and their pride. That’s what wars do. Can you point out in the constitution where we have tome nice to traitors who caused all those deaths?
It’s late. Check in tommorow with a full on answer. It really doesn’t have to be this way. I am most certain. It is up to us though.
You are suffering from lastworditis Drfop the mouse, take a 15 minute break and see if it goes away or if you can think of something meaningful to say about the greatest president in US history.
FRegards,
TXnMA
You should teach yourself what an “absurd absolute” is.
Windmill water.
Aermotor 702. No, not a new one. An old one.
Had even one trial been held, I don't think the South would have been so quick to forgive and forget Lincoln's War.
“you should teach your child the consequences of treason”
Yes, teach your children: first the verdict, then the trial.
A non-violent solution is possible, but only if a large enough majority of voters decide to support Trump and like-minded candidates in 2018 then again in 2020.
I base this on the following analysis. The leftist “resistance” as they call it is actually phase two of a revolution partially completed then interrupted (unexpectedly from their point of view). This was supposed to be a period to consolidate gains made under Obama and perhaps move closer to a one-party state.
Instead, Trump is lodged firmly in the White House and no amount of lying or pretence can change that fact. So the revolution has failed to complete its mission.
Some Trump supporters seem to think that they are themselves “revolutionary” (probably in deference to the original Revolution that created America). I would argue that they (you) are counter-revolutionaries attempting to return the country to the rule of law and traditional values.
I would also argue that despite Trump’s considerable success against formidable odds (the deep state), this counter-revolution has not been fully articulated even by him or his administration. There is some movement towards a formal declaration of what this counter-revolution really intends to achieve, but perhaps not a complete agreement or understanding.
I would argue that the counter revolution should take the following form:
(a) eliminate the power of globalists to direct public policy in America and where possible in other western nations.
(b) end the recent trend towards a social deference to the gay and lesbian community and other client groups of the globalist elites — they should have some limited civil liberties but not the power or the right to boss the entire society around in retribution for perceived past injustices.
(c) end any movement towards a carbon tax or any other hocus pocus about the grand fiction of our time, climate change.
(d) end illegal immigration and cut back on legal immigration while renewing the vigor of the American society to create its own opportunities and destiny.
The final point is to be proud of what of you do as counter-revolutionaries, you are fighting in the direct spirit of the founders of the nation and those who fought to defend it over two and a half centuries. Let none of these scumbags make even the slightest inroads into your self confidence, you are in the right and they are in the wrong, delusional, and trying to destroy your nation (and several others) for the benefit of a very deranged agenda that, if it ever succeeded, would create an anthill society of global proportions in which 99% of us would be slaves to a super-wealthy elite living behind walls and gates.
I think the president knows this because he has mixed socially in those circles and has come away with a clear understanding of who they are and what they want. It is very similar to communism in that a seductive ideology is used to turn people into willing slaves, even though year after year, there is nothing in it for them at all except a bit of bread and circus entertainment.
You will prevail if more people can be rescued from the clutches of the globalists. The main challenges are to pull away more young people, women, Hispanics and blacks. They have been given special status making it harder to rebel, but have they really gained anything? Clearly not — and slowly but surely more of each of these groups will realize this. It’s only a “patriarchy” when men are the majority of those willing to follow the rule of law. It’s only so-called white supremacy when whites are the only group willing to follow the rule of law.
The worst offenders are those you might call race traitors, people who have chosen for whatever bizarre reason to turn against their own race and do everything possible to promote hatred against their own racial group. The implied group is, “hate them all except us, and give us the right to be in charge, because actually, we are superior.”
The irony is that if everyone accepted the rule of law as the foundation of a free society, there would be no racism and no misogyny. A lot of those charges are in fact projection by people who can’t find comfort within their own minds when they half realize what they are actually thinking.
(the implied group ... should say the implied message)
WWCE
= wish we could edit
Don't be so glib and blasé about the possibility of a civil war in this country. It wouldn't be neat and easy; it would be nasty and mean and vicious. Neighbor against neighbor, for there is nowhere the vote was 100% one side or the other. Family members against family members; friends against former friends, and personal enemies using the disorder to even old scores. Read up on the original Civil War in places like Eastern Tennessee/Western North Carolina or Western Virginia/West Virginia or Missouri.
And it would be even worse for our conservative values. An orderly, law-abiding, constitutional society would likely go the way of the civil peace. Freedoms would probably be replaced by forced conformity to the local social/political consensus, dissenters to be lynched.
So don't find it so surprising that many of us conservatives regard the possibility of civil strife with horror. We will fight if we have to, or can, but we won't LIKE it.
Maybe he heard about the ringers.
If a 98-pound weakling tries to pick a fight, before calibrating your response you need to consider who he might have brought with him.
Rutger Hauer, is that what he’s up to these days?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.