Posted on 06/17/2018 9:29:42 AM PDT by george76
One reason why Sessions, Wray, Rosenstein and the other corrupt Swamp defenders have refused to use a criminal investigation to collect evidence in all this is that it keeps the wrongdoers safe from search warrants.
In a criminal investigation, investigators could obtain McCabe’s private communications and find any communications with Clinton people in which he is keeping them apprised of the progess of the investigation (well, sham investigation) into Hillary’s secret server.
Such private records are purged with time and that is part of why they are delaying things with a 15-month IG investigation, slow-walking congressional demands, etc.
All well and good and very interesting...for fiction. Too bad no one will be prosecuted.
No surprise here now the 700000 donation to Mcabe’s wife has an evidentiary connection
Oh how I yearn for the Old days when Murder Inc. was around.
In the end the great Hillary cover up going to cost a lot of jobs and jail time for some.
Valiant Mr. McCabe was a Honey Pot used by the FBI to entrap unscrupulous members of the Investigation Team in order to ensure fairness was the key; or, Valiant Mr. McCabe was the Insurance Policy for the Clintons — more likely!
Has anyone ever actually seen a live , walking , talking verified as to identity Peter Strzok? All we have are 3 dated pics and I don’t trust them.
Same with her. I think she is skankier now than picture we keep seeing.
I’m not sure she was really his mistress. I’m thinking that perhaps they used the pretense of an affair, as cover for their back-channel communication.
Thanks george76.
I’m so charmed by these thugs... /s
They'll be bled dry by legal costs before they either turn states eviidence or go to prison.
to stay appraised of the probe
ap·praise:
verb
past tense: appraised; past participle: appraised
assess the value or quality of.
ap·prise:
verb
past tense: apprised; past participle: apprised
inform or tell (someone).
Editing is dead.
L
My money is on an Arkancidation occurring in the next few months.
I’m inclined to agree.
I see no evidence of any affection, lust, whatever. Not even “what are you wearing?”
I agree with the use of this documentation/illustration tool.
The LSM is WAY too stupid to be able to provide same.
We may not be privy to all of the communications.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.