Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Must Build Their Own Culture or Be Exiles Inside Their Own Society
Townhall.com ^ | June 4, 2018 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 06/04/2018 1:10:36 AM PDT by Kaslin

Liberals want to win the victory they can’t achieve at the ballot box by using their cultural power to systematically marginalize and exclude Normal Americans from every aspect of society – and we can’t let them. From the business world to Hollywood, we are seeing them react to their utter repudiation in recent elections by trying to intimidate us into silent conformity as the price of us being allowed to participate in the non-governmental institutions of society. We must therefore have a two-part response to this act of cultural warfare – not only must we get right back in their smug little faces, but we must also build our own cultural institutions, ones that they can’t control.

The militant Normals built this country; they can build their own institutions too.

Now, of course we can’t always build parallel institutions right away. Sometimes we need to force the existing ones to behave. Social media platforms like Twitter (in which I own stock) and search engine institutions like Google are so humongous that they are difficult to replicate (but Gab and engines like Duck Duck Go are trying). The fact is that social media is becoming our society’s primary public forum, and excluding conservatives is essentially excluding conservatives from participation in politics. That’s unacceptable, meaning we will not just sit there and accept it.

So when the social media companies start deplatforming conservatives, and engines like Google start up with antics like listing the GOP’s ideology as “Nazism,” we need to respond to their exercise of their power with the exercise of our own power – via our elected representatives. A GOP bill requiring social media platforms to explicitly and clearly explain their content policies, to disclose to banned people their exact violation, to provide a rapid, meaningful appeal process, and to provide for lawsuits (with fee awards to prevailing plaintiffs) to remedy violations is just the first step toward a regulatory solution.

The Fredocons will whine that this is not a conservative solution. Oh. Well, we tried submission and that doesn’t work for us. My conservative principles include fighting fire with a firestorm. Don’t want none, don’t start none – if you exercise your power, we’ll exercise ours. I don’t want to do it, but the two choices are 1) open, free, and unregulated platforms, or 2) platforms regulated to protect our rights. Maintaining platforms that exclude Normals is not an option. So, choose wisely Silicon Valley.

But for most institutions, we have alternative options that don’t necessarily involve leveraging our government power. When companies start deciding they want to modify our behavior by refusing to do business with people the libs hate, like NRA members, we can boycott them. We can also choose to support businesses that don’t disrespect us. There are lots of banks that don’t discriminate against those exercising the Second Amendment. By supporting companies that respect us – and not patronizing ones that diss us (like Dick’s Sporting Goods) – we are effectively building parallel institutions. But we can also create our own businesses from the ground up.

And we need to. Who isn’t sick of Starbuck’s and its insufferable limo lib condescension? There’s a space for a coffee house chain that doesn’t tolerate druggies, vagrants, and bums – “I’ll have a venti hobo with an extra shot of bindle.”

How about someone starts an objectivist coffeehouse chain called Galt’s? You can order, but the barista will make you a cup of fancy joe according to his personal vision of what your drink should be, and if you complain he will give you a 50,000-word lecture on how he won’t ever compromise his heroic java artistry. Plus, not just conservatives will love its restroom policy. Who’s in Galt’s john? Paying customers only!

Insurgent coffee houses can distinguish themselves from woke bean water joints by welcoming all Americans, not just the ones who are assimilated into the Samantha Bee hive mind. That goes for every kind of business. How excited would you be to patronize a company that has the mob show up and says, “Yes, some of our customers are outraged by what [whoever] said. We sell [whatever] and we think you can make up your own mind about politics. We are not excluding anyone. Thanks!”

Hollywood is likewise willfully alienating customers by taking sides. Think what you want about Roseanne herself, but her show touched millions of overlooked people – and the show employed hundreds of people who are now out of work. Solo, which was not woke at all, was wokeness-fatigue collateral damage because many of us expected it to be another boring lib lecture with ray guns after the last three iterations of Jedi Girl Ghostbusters in Space.

Luckily, technology is breaking down the barriers to entry into the entertainment field. Networks are no longer gatekeepers – heck, they are barely relevant. We can make our own entertainment, and we need to. How about Adam’s 12, a gritty crime procedural with conservative superstar Adam Baldwin as the grizzled leader of a dozen elite cops and prosecutors? The best part would be how the criminal always turns out to be the gangbanging scumbag everyone originally thought was guilty, instead of having the hackneyed Law & Order twist where the villain is revealed to be the rich businessman, the conservative radio host, or the pro-life activist. You know, just like in real life.

Or perhaps we could do a show about a guy on a mission worthy of Superman – patriotic actor Dean Cain starring in Dean Dean Cain, about the new conservative head of a liberal arts college fighting for free speech and campus carry against student SJWs and a commie faculty led by a bitter, lonely gender studies professor played by Alyssa Milano. Yeah, she’d take the role – she needs the cash.

Certainly Normal Americans would binge watch Nick of Time, where acting legend and bane of Twitter liberals Nick Searcy could play a conservative avenger who wanders the Red states, stepping in at the last minute to save Normal heroes like gun makers, born-again Christians, and people who work to support their own families, from oppression by wicked villains like uppity hipsters, angry atheists, and malevolent bureaucrats.

The truth is that the walls really are coming down – what good is a gatekeeper if you can just walk around the gate? Technology makes production accessible at a fraction of what it used to cost, and the ravenous Internet is starving for content. There’s nothing to stop us conservative from stepping in and doing it ourselves.

The same is true in the world of publishing. While some traditional publishers will take a chance on conservative books (like my Militant Normals, dropping in October and Derek Hunter's excellent Outrage, Inc, out in two weeks), technology like Amazon’s Kindle and publishing on-demand has let me reach many thousands with my conservative action novels about America torn apart and patriots fighting back against tyranny. And more conservatives are taking advantage of this opportunity because they are being systematically driven out of the public sphere as the old players refuse to meet the needs and wants of the Normal Americans they hold in contempt.

The best solution would, of course, be a free market in which the cultural and commercial producers supplied content solely in accordance with demand – that is, where their goal is the laudable one of just making some bucks. After all, conservative money spends just like liberal money, so there’s no incentive to discriminate. Freedom happens when the motive is profit, not ideology.

But as we keep seeing, money is not the only motivation to those temporarily holding sway over our cultural institutions. They will take a hit in the pocket book to score their cheap little points against us. We need to confront that nonsense, hard, and raise the cost of liberal virtue signaling high enough that they will think twice before trying it. But we also need to build our own institutions, institutions that meet Normal Americans’ needs, not the needs of some Silicon Valley socialist or Hollywood pinko. And if we don’t, we may well find ourselves exiled from our own society.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: entertainment; schlichter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: who_would_fardels_bear

But to be blunt, that isnt the world’s problem.

Either make it work or suck it up.


61 posted on 06/04/2018 8:12:58 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
but otherwise law-abiding immigrant has little collective impact,

You see right there you go off the rails. Legal immigration has been hurting Americans and lowering wages for decades. Same with import dumping and no tariff. Look a the H-1b visa program. This is why IMO co called libertarians are dangerous and need to be fought tooth and nail.

62 posted on 06/04/2018 8:41:27 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I go off the rails? You missed my point and conflate your view of what libertarians hold, a position that I carefully disagreed with, with what I hold.

We are, I think, in agreement on this one.


63 posted on 06/04/2018 9:10:36 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bump


64 posted on 06/04/2018 9:36:56 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (We're even doing the right thing for them. They just don't know it yet. --Donald Trump, CPAC '18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Sorry I didn’t have time to read your whole past. I should have waited to respond. O the joys of Freeping and working at the same time. So I have finished with it and I agree with it. But I am confused: are you saying that libertarians, that believe in “free trade” and open immigration, are somehow conservatives too?


65 posted on 06/04/2018 10:12:04 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: central_va
are you saying that libertarians, that believe in “free trade” and open immigration, are somehow conservatives too?

No I am not. This is the problem with labels rather than actual positions. There are conservatives whose view is that the power of the state should be used to enforce "conservative" social values rather than leftist social values. Classic liberals believe that the state should just stay out of the lawful business of its lawful citizens and define their lawful business rather broadly.

What I am arguing is that the attempt to pin the free and open immigration plank on all self-described libertarians is wrong. Classic liberal liberatrians take nations, citizenship and the rights that go with it seriously. Most libertarians believe in defending borders and national sovereignty against all incursions, not just armed incursions.

For instance I would argue that the American social contract is our Constitution and the British common law that underlies that constitution. Individual liberty is not consistent with the open immigration of 100,000,000 people whose avowed purpose is to live at peace under our laws until such time as they can vote in Sharia law. Any libertarian who signs up for that is going to meet his just Darwinian fate.

66 posted on 06/04/2018 10:32:08 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Most libertarians believe in defending borders and national sovereignty against all incursions, not just armed incursions.

I know quite few libertarians, and they all couldn't care less about illegal or legal immigration for that matter. Rush Limbaugh, what I consider the quintessential Libertarian parading as a conservative, pays lip service to the border and immigration but legal immigration is not his his thing. He has NEVER mentioned H-1b visa abuse on his show that I know of for example. He's been carrying the water for the globalist free traders for decades. There are other tell issues that Rush ignores.

67 posted on 06/04/2018 11:00:28 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“You bleed the same on duty no matter how you live your private life.”

Utterly irrelevant. You’ve been in CA too long.

Faggotry has morphed from the vice that dare not speak its name to the vice that won’t shut up. Same-sex attraction disorder is a serious illness. It can’t be compartmentalized. It always spills over into other areas. There is no place in the military for anyone who suffers from SSAD. Or in any other area of life, for that matter.

“Conservatives have a different view. Your values and how you live them, is your business.”

That is not a conservative view. That is a libertarian-left position. A conservative view discerns good from evil, healthy from depraved, right from wrong.

Fudge-packing is evil. It is depraved. It is wrong.


68 posted on 06/04/2018 11:54:09 AM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I always thought the ban on gays serving in the military made no sense because I have a libertarian view that what consenting adults do in the bedroom is no one else’s business.

Soldiers live in barracks, and other tight quarters - not in bedrooms. In spite of strong proscriptions against sexual deviancy in the military, homos will eventually act on their impulses anyway, which is bad for troop morale.

Rules of conduct in the military aren't arbitrary. They arose from centuries of war fighting experience, and most are designed to save lives and to maintain a better fighting force than our enemies.

69 posted on 06/04/2018 11:54:57 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

You are correct in all particulars, but I am still angry with Normal Americans.

Normal Americans should have figured this out in the 1980s. I want to call them a name, but I just can’t come up with anything that both lauds them for being Normal and chides them for being late to the party.


70 posted on 06/04/2018 11:59:19 AM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

“Her entire popular vote margin came in California.”

Please remember voter fraud. If valid votes only were counted, Trump would win by several million.

Accepting their figures is endorsing their crimes.


71 posted on 06/04/2018 12:02:37 PM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bert
Hillary won the popular vote. There are more of them than of us.

I don't believe either one of those claims.

Liberals appear to be more numerous and more powerful than they really are, because they control so many of our key institutions. They're also experts at vote fraud.

If they're as numerous as you suggest, they shouldn't have lost over 1,400 state and federal elections since 2010.

72 posted on 06/04/2018 12:10:15 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
For a change I can't agree with Schlichter. We have a culture, an astoundingly successful one. The issue is that it is being actively repressed and systematically plundered, and the necessary corrective is to defend it on its own terms. "We build it, they steal it" hasn't worked, and won't.

We need to confront that nonsense, hard, and raise the cost of liberal virtue signaling high enough that they will think twice before trying it.

Now that we can do, and the weapon is ridicule, because political correctness has become self-parody and its practitioners have become jokes from being humorless. The roles of the 70's have become reversed, and the mighty Counterculture is now the dull, smothering, totalitarian Establishment, just as some of us predicted lo those many years ago. They're Andropov-style enforcers trying to crush samizdat, and it isn't going to work.

It could get bloody, though, or more properly bloodier than now, because people who have seized power tend not to want to relinquish it. Embrace the struggle. You might as well, else it embraces you.

73 posted on 06/04/2018 12:16:27 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The military is supposed to set an example for society


I generally agree with your sentiments, but you need to rethink that. The military is regimented and tasked to break things and kill people. That’s not what you want society to do.


74 posted on 06/04/2018 1:05:49 PM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

later read


75 posted on 06/04/2018 2:57:00 PM PDT by Chuckster (There is no government solution to government corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark


76 posted on 06/04/2018 2:59:05 PM PDT by thesearethetimes... (Had I brought Christ with me, the outcome would have been different. Dr.Eric Cunningham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark


77 posted on 06/04/2018 3:08:53 PM PDT by thesearethetimes... (Had I brought Christ with me, the outcome would have been different. Dr.Eric Cunningham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
.....we take must back the educational system and return it to studies where kids actually learn things without
indoctrination.......school books designed with falsities have to go . ......

Doesnt anyone think its strange to have these Planned Parenthood genital sniffers in our schools 24/7 K-12?

Their only function is (A) to condition young women to tolerate the harvey weinstein's of the world,
(B) to condition young boys to be fodder for pedophiles, (C) to make sure youngsters are ready for sex, without the
"punishment" of (horrors) having a baby.

PP's goal is to outfit every youngster with birth control.....same as prostitutes.

78 posted on 06/04/2018 4:30:14 PM PDT by Liz ( (Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
"Can the ranks look up to a commanding officer who cross-dresses in uniform?"

Good point. ...or one who cross-dresses out of uniform. Either on or off duty, it would be a morale killer.


79 posted on 06/04/2018 5:01:05 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill; Honorary Serb

Ping.


80 posted on 06/04/2018 5:47:47 PM PDT by lightman (ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson