YES! I want to see the Libs vote against this one!
The first order of business would be signing a permanent peace treaty to end the existing armistice.
It is the only Constitutional way.
IIRC Obama had help, republican senator Corker was instrumental in subverting the constitution for Obamas Iran deal.
Agreed. We all saw what became of Obummer’s “pen and phone” legacy. POOF. As empty as his commie noggin.
Of course any agreement with North Korea should be submitted to Congress for ratification. Otherwise, any future president could alter it or discard it as he pleases - apparently that never occurred to Obama.
I’ve been advocating for a ratified treaty with Norklandia since whispers of a summit first emerged.
I a far deal which takes nukes out of the north and shuts down their capability, I cannot imagine anyone in the Senate voting against it.
Not even Democrats.
In an election year.
If and once it is a treaty, yes. I fear McCarthy is up to friend Ryan’s Never Trumper tricks to limit Trump’s authority.
I’ll bet there aren’t 67 votes in the Senate for #MAGA.
Support Free Republic, Folks!
The swamp speaks.
....”lawmakers should have a full say on the matter”...
Oh my gosh!... it would never see the light of day once that happens!
What does the Constitution really say about the powers of the President?
This is NOT a treaty in the traditional sense. It is more of the U.S. overseeing a treaty signed among China, NK, SK, and Japan.
This deal is paving the way for reunification and an end to the Korean War (which technically has not ended).
Was the Japanese surrender to the U.S. submitted to the Senate? No, it wasn't.
Typical, scumbag Republicans meddling and effing thing up.
Why? 0bozo bypassed the Senate several times.
Relax McCarthy.
Hopefully, the vote will happen before elections.
I will enjoy watching the RATs squirm.
Sounds like the proper way to do it.
No. Involving those useless dickheads in Congress can’t possibly be a good thing.