Posted on 04/26/2018 8:49:55 AM PDT by davikkm
A study conducted by the German Federal Police (BKA) on migrant crime has found that African asylum seekers are far more prone to criminality than their Middle Eastern counterparts. The study shows that migrants from countries which are far less likely to receive a positive asylum claim are also far more likely to engage in crime while in the country, Stuttgarter Zeitung reports.
Tunisian migrants, who make up just 0.2 per cent of recognised asylum seekers since 2015, account for 2.2 per cent of crimes committed by recognised asylum seekers. The statistics are even more dramatic for Moroccans who account for a mere one per cent of asylum seekers yet are 7.6 per cent of asylum seeker suspects.
Rainer Wendt, head of the German police union, said that the reason for the higher rates of criminality is that migrants who have less of a chance of gaining asylum or residency status have “nothing to lose”.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
For Pete’s sake, stop referring to these rapacious baboons as “asylum seekers”. Of course they go through the motions of applying for asylum, but this is purely a ruse to get into the country, take up a life of crime and sponge off taxpayers. Genuine asylum seekers simply wouldn’t behave that way.
no way!
“the color of crime”
Major Findings
The evidence suggests that if there is police racial bias in arrests it is negligible. Victim and witness surveys show that police arrest violent criminals in close proportion to the rates at which criminals of different races commit violent crimes.
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups.
In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting” — defined as firing a bullet that hits someone — a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.
In an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.
In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.
In 2015, police killings of blacks accounted for approximately 4 percent of homicides of blacks. Police killings of unarmed blacks accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of homicides of blacks. The overwhelming majority of black homicide victims (93 percent from 1980 to 2008) were killed by blacks.
Both violent and non-violent crime has been declining in the United States since a high in 1993. 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that some observers associated with “depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity.
Fascinating how the choice to stop recording the race of mulsim criminals has resulted in far less crime by muslim criminals. A miracle!
Well yes, Tunisia and Morocco are in Africa.....but they’re not quite like say, Tanzanians now are they? What else might they have in common other than just being from Africa? (Que Jeopardy music)
Statistics ping!
Like saying that cats are more likely to chase mice than dogs.
What a surprise!
Shocking!
Unexpected.
This might be something to consider in their analysis: are the African’s doing so because:
- what they are doing is not considered a crime in their home country?
- although a crime, it is so widespread that their actions are defacto acceptable?
- are they acting such because the Imam’s have declared it acceptable to do so to the infidel?
- is in inherent in their nature (preponderance of evidence of similar activity in their home country)?
Great info, thanks for posting.
They had to do a STUDY?
“German Police Study Finds Africans Most Criminally Prone Asylum Seekers”
Oddly, it’s the same in every country.
That’s racist!
Does it ever occur to Germans that their Fuhrer may be right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.