Posted on 04/25/2018 8:21:21 PM PDT by deks
The report begins with this statement: "Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone."
What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Muellers disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully elected President, writes GOP Congressman Louie Gohmert.
Gohmert is referring to the exhaustive expose he just released called: Robert Mueller: Unmasked. [linked in full in the article]
The 48 page read is fascinating highlighting some of the most bizarre bits of Bobby Muellers long history in the Deep State Swamp.
(Excerpt) Read more at constitution.com ...
Dittos to alexander_busek, Paladin2, and AndyJackson ... Being ‘Old school’ taught, I fully understand him as he wrote it. a chilling read, too.
#30. Must read post.
Thank you cboldt
Exactly correct. A report this important should have been constructed with the utmost care to grammar, punctuation, syntax, structure, formatting, etc. Instead, it reads like something a basement blogger would write.
I love Louie, but he and his staff just failed at a fundamental level. His report will be torn apart in the press and hooted off the stage.
Bkmrk Gohmet Dossier
Tell ‘em; “SUCK IT up butter butt; No crying in Jungle Rules.
Gohmert’s sentence structure is just fine.
...a long and sordid history of targeting innocent people...
...is what Robert Muller has.
And it is that “long and sordid history of targeting innocent people”
...that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.
There’s nothing wrong with Gohmert’s phraseology.
A few commas might make the sentence understandable:
Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history, of illicitly targeting innocent people, that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.
“All of what the Congressman said is true. However if Michael Cohen flips on TRUMP and accuses him of authorizing or approving the use of Campaign funds to pay the Plastic Stormy, it does not matter. Trump could be in trouble guilty or not.
Michael Cohen does not look like the guy who takes bullets for anyone. “
Yeah, the non-stop, frenzy, melodrama and sensationalism headlines are getting tiresome. Boom! tick-rock, etc... yields a face palm.
Yeah... I cant watch Hannitys boorish interruptions and non-stop loop of the same monologue every night. He even tries to out-lawyer his guest lawyers.
Psst, web search for “Sessions confidence in Mueller” brings up where he said it to the Intel committee last year.
Just FYI.
Sean Hannity and his guests have been running down Robert Mueller corruption in Boston for many weeks. Took place in BeanTown and was Whitey Bulger related.
Louie Gomert undoubtedly got his material from Hannity
GO GOMERT!
Excellent post on corrupt-o-crat Bob Mueller
Hopefully Uranium One will be added.
It’d be even better if there were 435 people like him.
He’s the same one who insists “Rosenstein is a white hat.” The same Rosenstein who trampled attorney-client privilege authorizing the Cohen raid and who appointed Mueller and who gave Mueller wide open range.
“Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.”
I generally try to avoid comments on grammar, but since FReepers have made it a cause celebre herein, I opine:
The sentence is perfectly well written. As it is written, neither the addition of commas nor the word substitution (i.e., which for that) would improve it; rather, either would disimprove it.
Rewriting it with both the commas and the word substitution would make it less elegant, even if grammatically correct.
I am not a lifelong editor, but I am also old school; I scored well within the top half of the top one percentile in Standard English aptitude tests.
This sentence is written the way well-educated writers were taught to write. Grammar is no longer highly valued or well taught.
Hannity should acknowledge the Simpli Safe was one of the first companies to join the NRA boycott.
There is a lot that has not been published/revealed about the FBI under Bill Clinton’s administration.
The deliberate ignoring of Field Agents’ information about foreign Moslems taking flying lessons for major aircraft under unusual circumstances was circumvented by regional FBI managers/offices and may never have reached headquarters. If it had, and someone had paid attention to it, 9/11 would probably have been avoided by law enforcement raids.
The whole Clinton “stand down” policies of 1994-95 need a full congressional investigation. Some were realistic due to the supposed “collapse” of the Soviet Union as an international threat, but others were just plain stupid and we paid for it on 9/11 when NO ARMED MILTIARY AIRCRAFT could be launched to intercept the hijacked planes.
I heard the plane that struck the Pentagon as I was getting ready to go to work. Heard it when it first circled DC and then as it approached the Pentagon, then the blast and the shock.
Should never have happened.
No missiles on the roof of the Pentagon? What the hell happened to them? The Pentagon defense force had them for years.
Panetta’s background is very interesting and Louie Freeh’s most admired law professor at Rutgers Un. was a leading Communist Party USA (frontman) attorney, Arthur Kinoy. Freeh told about this in his book “My FBI”, about page 164.
Kinoy was one of the most hardcore Marxists in the history of the CPUSA’s legal Left cadre. I saw him in action several times. Very smart. Fooled Freeh, didn’t he?
There is so much information out there on how Clinton and company screwed up our internal and international defesne postures which may 9/11 inevitable, esp. when they misread the WTC I 1993 bombing as a single act (not a part of a larger terrorism/targeting operation).
Never trust a Democrat with the protection of America. They have always failed since the time of FDR.
It reads fine and it makes perfect sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.