Posted on 03/19/2018 8:15:37 AM PDT by Magnatron
A New York Democratic congressman is being accused of promoting violence against President Trump after suggesting during a town hall that citizens may have to take up arms against the president if he doesn’t follow the law.
“I mean, this is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?” Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., said during a March 12 Q&A session with constituents in Huntington, on Long Island.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
WHERE ARE THE F'N REPUBLICANS?!?
Step up A-Holes! How can you sit on your hands and let this keep happening???
But it’s “patriotic” to do this according to the Left?
Since when did they ever care about the US Constitution?
It starts out small and grows..
How far we have fallen in such a short time.
Not so long ago we prided ourselves on being a nation of laws.
Now we have members of congress openly advocating and encouraging the killing of a president.
(Sniffle) Suozzi is a Democrat "true believer." So touching (sob).
The Democrats’ Creed ---what they really believe (hat tip Michael Kelly)
Democrats believe President Bill Clinton. And have always believed him. Democrats believed it when Clinton said he had never been drafted in the Vietnam War and believed him later when Clinton said he had merely “forgotten to mention” that he had been drafted in the Vietnam War.
Democrats believed him when Clinton he said he hadn’t had sex with Gennifer Flowers and believed him later, when Clinton reportedly said he did bed her down.
Democrats believed the president did not rent out the Lincoln Bedroom to celebrities, did not sell access to himself and the vice president to hundreds of well-heeled special pleaders and did not supervise the largest, most systematic money-laundering operation in campaign finance history, collecting more than $ 3 million in illegal and improper donations.
Democrats believe that Charlie Trie and James Riady were motivated by nothing but patriotism for their adopted country.
Democrats believed President Clinton when he conceded that his administration mistakenly obtained the FBI files of more than 300 people, including many top Republicans and believes it was the result of a “completely honest bureaucratic snafu” involving security clearances.
Democrats believed Clinton’s chief of staff, Leon Panetta, when he told reporters that “obviously a mistake was made” and apologized to the people whose FBI files wound up at the White House. Democrats believed Clinton when he said “I completely support” what my COS Panetta said about the affair.
Democrats believed Vice President Gore when he said that he had made dunning calls to political contributors “on a few occasions” from his White House office, and believed him when he said that, actually, “a few” meant 46.
Democrats devoutly believe in "no controlling legal authority"....but not for Nixon or Trump.
Democrats believed Bruce Babbitt when he said that the $286,000 contributed to the DNC by Indian tribes opposed to granting a casino license to rival tribes had nothing to do with his denial of the license. Democrats believed the secretary when he said that he had not been instructed in this matter by then-White House deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes.
Democrats believed him when he said later that he had told lobbyist and friend Paul Eckstein that Ickes had told him to move on the casino decision, but that he had been lying to Eckstein. Democrats agreed with the secretary that it is an outrage that anyone would question his integrity.
Democrats firmly believe in the “Clinton Standard” of adherence to the nation’s campaign finance and bribery laws, enunciated by the president on March 7, 1997: “I don’t believe you can find any evidence of the fact that I had changed government policy solely because of a contribution.” Democrats noted with approval the use of the word “evidence” and also the use of the word “solely.” Democrats devoutly believe, as Clinton does, that it is proper to change government policy to address the concerns of people who have"given the president money, as long as nobody can find "evidence" of this being the "sole" reason.
Democrats believe president Clinton lived up to his promise to preside over the most ethical administration in American history that indicted former agriculture secretary Mike Espy did not accept $35,000 in illegal favors from Tyson Foods and other regulated businesses.
Democrats believe that indicted former housing secretary Henry Cisneros did not lie to the FBI and tell others to lie to cover up $250,000 in blackmail payments to his former mistress.
Democrats believe that convicted former associate attorney general Webster Hubbell was not involved in the obstruction of justice when the president’s minions arranged for Hubbell to receive $ 400,000 in sweetheart consulting deals at a time when he was reneging on his promise to cooperate with Kenneth Starr’s Whitewater investigation.
Democrats believe, as Harvey Weinstein does, that Paula Jones is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, that Kathleen Willey is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, and that Monica Lewinsky is a cheap tramp who was asking for it.
Democrats believed Hillary Clinton that Bimbo Eruptions needed to be put-down and they approved of using tax dollars to establish an eight-year office in the White House dedicated solely to marginalizing, demeaning and lacerating women who dared accuse Hillary's husband of sexual improprieties.
Democrats firmly believe Monica Lewinsky was “just fantasizing” in her 20 hours of taped conversation in which she reportedly detailed her sexual relationship with the president and begged Linda Tripp to join her in lying about the relationship and that any gifts, correspondence, telephone calls and the 37 post-employment White House visits that may have passed between Lewinsky and the president are evidence only of a platonic relationship.
Democrats believe that such innocent intimate friendships are quite common between middle-aged married men and young single women, and also between presidents of the United States and White House interns.
Democrats saw nothing suspicious in the report that the president’s intimate pal, Vernon Jordan, arranged a $40,000-per-year job for Lewinsky shortly after she signed but before she filed an affidavit saying she had not had sex with the president.
Nor did trusting Democrats read anything untoward into the fact that the ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson, visited Lewinsky at the Watergate to offer her a job.
Democrats believe the instructions Lewinsky gave Linda Tripp informing her on how to properly perjure herself in the Willey matter "simply wrote themselves."
Democrats believe, as does Hillary, that The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, Time, U.S. News & World Report, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS and NPR are all part of a vast right-wing conspiracy to malign the saintly Clintons.
Are we getting the green light in California?
And despite the fact that it's ALL BULLSPIT, we will just sit back and piss and moan and not do a damned thing about it.
The deep state may be testing the waters to see what response to expect if they take out the President. I’m sure they would expect trouble, but It would end up being either the end of democracy or the end of the Democrat party.
Imagine if a Republican congressman would have done this to Obama. It would be all over the media.
Yet the media is silent.
These idiots talk a big game....WE have the guns and WE have the guts.
It will continue until the mid-terms, which by then, Muller's fix will be in and they'll own the House and Senate.
Which is why Trump should fire Mueller, and why the Democrats are so vocal about him not doing so. Mueller is part of their mid-term strategy, and Trump should take this from them and go on the offensive. Each and every public utterance out of the White House should mention the deep, deep corruption within the entire Democrat party, and how they sold the nation down the drain and have used minorities in the process. Offense, offense, and then more offense - unrelenting. It's astounding that the party that defended a President having sex in the Oval Office pantry, with an intern, downstairs from where his wife and child lived, is now talking about Trump breaking the law. If Trump broke any law, we would have known about it with specifics long ago. This is and has been truly a witch hunt, and is nothing less than a Democrat/leftist attempt to entrap and orchestrate a coup. What the left just don't yet understand is that the clock cannot be turned back, and those Americans they called deplorables and that helped elect Trump are not ever going to just go along as good little defeated lambs. Those days are entirely over. The left are motivated by hatred and disdain for those who don't share their world view.
By 'media' you're referring to the DNC press corp, right?
We patriots have those things, but what good are they without our being organized?
They became L&O types about the same time they began to worship at the feet of the Intel Community. It’slikely few if any of them remember Democrat Senator Frank Church.
Yes. Republicans should be lecturing the left.
Suozzi, YOU are the reason we have the 2nd.
wait....what...Nassau County on lawn guylant is as restrictive and anti 2nd amendment environment as it gets. Where are those noo yawk sheep going to find those scary assault rifles with chainsaw attachments highlighted a little ways back in USA today?
“...and those Americans they called Deplorables who helped elect Trump are not ever going to just go along as good little defeated lambs...”
Who at the Federal level is going to enforce lockstep conformity? Dianne Feinstein? Only the President can mobilize military force against domestic insurrection and there are huge obstacles to doing that.
Brennan, Mueller, & the rest of the Deep State are unable to move against the populace as a whole. Their evil intent is aimed at the White House.
But at the state level, “Molon labe” seems to be working. Liberal states have passed laws restricting what had been unrestricted but the compliance rate is in the low teens. However, the governors have not yet sent out their flying squads to start knocking on doors.
But there’s a fiendish weapon being deployed more & more often: GVRO’s to confiscate guns based on hearsay & a judge who doesn’t like guns. Disarming one patriot at a time.
The people at this townhall were most certainly democRATS.
And I'll bet they are all gun-grabbers so they probably don't own guns.
So again what ARMS is this guy talking about?
Oh, I get it now. They're going to raise their arms with signs and protest in a march.
Bleeping idiots.
What is going on is this:a, Progressivism is replacing our inalienable rights Progressives have no use for and do not defend nor protect our United States Constitution and only quote the Declaration of Independence for getting votes.
Daily students are thrown out of class or school for not cow-towing to some Progressified notion about sex, religion,or some other popular scam for grants.
Progressivism is replacing our inalienable rights. Stand up and fight back for your country and your values.
The judiciary needs to be held responsible for their decisions and actions - legally and monetarily. It's long past time that the public be able to file sweeping law suits against judges. If a physician is negligent, they are liable. If an engineer is negligent, they are liable. The same should be true for judges.
Every decision they make should be made with the highest level of integrity, without personal bias. Clearly that isn't true anymore, and they need to be held accountable. Judges need to be fearful about committing gross errors, and particularly fearful about pushing an agenda. Their pensions, jobs, and law licenses should be at stake - AND, jail time a possibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.