REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Posted on 03/14/2018 8:47:13 AM PDT by servo1969
The abrupt firing Tuesday of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson follows months of infighting between the State Department and White House over efforts by Tillerson to save the Iran nuclear deal and ignore President Donald Trump's demands that the agreement be fixed or completely scrapped by the United States, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the situation who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon.
In the weeks leading up to Tillerson's departure, he had been spearheading efforts to convince European allies to agree to a range of fixes to the nuclear deal that would address Iran's ongoing ballistic missile program and continued nuclear research.
While Trump had prescribed a range of fixes that he viewed as tightening the deal's flaws, Tillerson recently caved to European pressure to walk back these demands and appease Tehran while preserving the deal, according to these sources. The Free Beacon first disclosed this tension last week in a wide-ranging report.
White House allies warned Tillerson's senior staff for weeks that efforts to save the nuclear deal and balk on Trump's key demands regarding the deal could cost Tillerson his job, a warning that became reality Tuesday when Trump fired Tillerson by tweet.
Tillerson will be replaced by CIA Director Mike Pompeo, a former member of Congress who established a record as being tough on Iran and echoing many of the policies called for by Trump. Insiders expect Pompeo to take a much harder line on the nuclear deal and pursue many of the fixes advocated by Trump, such as outlawing Iran's ballistic missile program and instating fierce repercussions for any future breach.
While Tillerson's exit had been rumored for months, multiple sources with knowledge of the situation said the former secretary's repeated attempts to balk the White House and pursue his own diplomatic strategy, particularly regarding Iran, triggered his sudden exit.
Sources with knowledge of the matter said the White House informed Tillerson on Friday that Trump was seeking to make a change.
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R., Fla.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and vocal opponent of the nuclear deal, said he expects Pompeo to more faithfully execute Trump's policies regarding Iran.
"President Trump has been clear that the Iran deal is terrible policy and has sought ways to hold Iran accountable," DeSantis told the Free Beacon. "With Mike Pompeo, Trump will have a Secretary of State who sees the threat posed by the JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] and by Tehran in a similar light as he does."
One veteran Iran policy expert who is close to the White House and worked repeatedly with the State Department told the Free Beacon that Tillerson worked to save the Iran deal as Trump was publicly advocating to scrap the agreement.
This tension between the White House and Foggy Bottom came to a head in recent days, prompting Trump to fire Tillerson and bring in Pompeo, an official who Trump believes will pressure European allies to more seriously fix a range of flaws in the nuclear deal.
"Tillerson staked his position on saving the Iran deal by threading the needle. He promised the president he could strengthen it enough to be good, but not so much the Europeans would backlash or the Iranians would bolt," said the source, who would only speak about the sensitive matter on background. "That was always going to be tricky, then it became impossible, then it became embarrassing. The Europeans weren't giving us enough on missiles and were refusing to budge on sunsets. And so here we are."
Opponents of the Iran deal on Capitol Hill welcomed the news of Tillerson's exit, telling the Free Beacon that as the deadline approaches for the United States and European allies to fix the Iran deal, Pompeo can help push Trump's hardline stance.
"As the deadline approaches to fix the Iran Deal, Tillerson's departure is welcome news. We need our top diplomat to share the president's view on the disastrous nature of the JCPOA, and CIA Director Pompeo is the right man for the job," said one senior congressional official who works on the Iran issue. "Hopefully now our European partners understand the president's resolve and will work with us to permanently prevent Iran from going nuclear."
Shortly after Trump fired Tillerson, the former secretary's spokesman issued a statement claiming Tillerson was not sure of the reason for his dismissal.
"The secretary did not speak to the president and is unaware of the reason," Steve Goldstein, undersecretary for public diplomacy, told reporters. Goldstein was fired later in the day due to his statement.
Sebastian Gorka, a former strategist and Deputy Assistant to President Trump, told the Free Beacon the White House had been laying the groundwork for Tillerson's departure since at least December of last year.
"This has been in the planning phase since at least December of last year and should come as a surprise to nobody," Gorka said. "The great things that were expected of Rex, especially in changing the America last culture at Foggy Bottom, did not happen, so this is a natural move."
Gorka praised Pompeo's work as CIA director and said "similar things are expected of him at the State Department."
Additionally, Gorka said, Pompeo "is loyal to the make American great again agenda."
Tillerson had been a source of tension for some time, according to insiders who explained the situation to the Free Beacon. The former Exxon executive gained a reputation for isolating top U.S. diplomats and even failing to return phone calls from senior officials such as David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel.
"There were serious problems, not only with Rex Tillerson isolating the Trump political appointees at State from his front office, but this was a secretary of state who wouldn't even return the calls of senior diplomats like our ambassador in Israel, and as such, his position was untenable."
Trump publicly acknowledged the discord in comments about the firing, saying that he and Tillerson did not often see eye-to-eye on key foreign policy matters.
Sources with knowledge of the president's thinking said that Tillerson's exit marks an effort by Trump to rid his administration of so-called "establishment figures" who openly worked at a crossroads with the president.
Tillerson's view that abandoning the nuclear deal would cause international tumult was cited by these sources as a key source of tension.
One senior former U.S. official with direct knowledge of the situation told the Free Beacon that Tillerson failed to properly read Trump's policy directives.
"It's very indicative of Tillerson to hear that he was surprised by the news because he has misread the president, failed to see cues all along, on policy and personal issues and has literally been in the dark from day one," said the official, who would only speak on background.
As Tillerson pursued his own agenda, United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley emerged as one of Trump's most vocal boosters on Iran policy and efforts to scrap the deal.
"She stepped in that vacuum," said the former senior official. "She, to her credit, read the vacuum that the State Department had made with having Rex there."
At the end of the day, Tillerson failed to galvanize even his own staff behind his diplomatic efforts.
"I've watched so many secretaries of state come in, and even if I didn't agree with them, they had a base of support somewhere," noted the former official, who spent time working in the State Department. "I struggle to know what was Rex Tillerson's base of support. The elites in Washington didn't like him, the policy wonks didn't like him ... he didn't have an audience with anyone, so it was inevitable he was going to be done."
Other White House insiders echoed this sentiment, telling the Free Beacon that Tillerson emerged as a roadblock to Trump's foreign policy strategy.
"Tillerson was an establishment figure, like Gary Cohn, and the president seems after a year to be tiring of them," said one source with knowledge of the matter. "He wants people closer to his own views. I think Tillerson's opposition on Jerusalem was a factor: it's not just that he opposed Trump but that he predicted violent reactions that didn't happen."
"I've got to figure that made the president wonder why he needed more such advice," the source said. "Same for the JCPOA and Tillerson's view that getting out of it would be a calamity."
President Trump runs it like a successful business should. Perform according to my vision, which means America first, or you are gone.
I have never seen this before.
They could all stand to learn a little about teamwork, and “commander’s intent.”
Semms Tillerson decided he knew better what America’s policy with Iran should be - just like he decide he knew better what the Boy Scouts’ policy on homosexuality should be.
Which explains why Trump fired him unceremoniously on Twitter.
Actually Tillerson had an almost impossible job. I don’t envision any deal that Trump, EU and Iran would all agree to.
Tillerson should have known that and defaulted to Trump’s other position - scrap the deal. A deal without verification is no deal. Better no deal than a bad deal that allows Iran to build nukes.
But how do we get our money back?
If that’s the case then AMF!
This is the kind of situation that develops when the swamp is allowed to operate for ITSELF rather than for the good of the people of America and the country in general. Getting rid of Tillerson shows what happens when we have a REAL American president work FOR the country.
Keep draining the swamp!!!!
Tillerson should have known that and defaulted to Trump’s other position - scrap the deal. A deal without verification is no deal. Better no deal than a bad deal that allows Iran to build nukes.
This is where “the resistance” and Never Trumper gaslighting has done great damage. Instead of following POTUS’s agenda like a subordinate should Tillerson decided he knew better and freelanced. This was never going to end well once he did that.
If this is the case then good riddance to Tillerson. What I can’t understand is Trump firing Tillerson fo good cause while Sessions continues to undermine the president and country every day he continues at DOJ.
Such a rouge bid would have gotten him executed four hundred years ago, and charged with treason two hundred years ago.
Trump must have been irate if Tillerson was fired in the manner that has been publicized.
And Trump firing him was out in the open, whereas Tillerson’s actions were a clandestine betrayal of monumental repercussions. Which is the worse behavior? Why does Tillerson deserve respect, when he has been most disrespectful.
Tillerson got swept up in the “Trump is stupid” delusion.
A deal without verification is no deal. Better no deal than a bad deal that allows Iran to build nukes.
Tillerson’s mistake was to essentially WILLINGLY adopt the agendas presented to him by the Deep State globalists which make up the great bulk of State Department bureaucrats. He did that even where the Deep State agendas were hostile to the vision of President Trump. Tillerson wasted a year of his life and he will not be missed.
Actually Tillerson had an almost impossible job. I don’t envision any deal that Trump, EU and Iran would all agree to.
The EU is still taking terrible advice from Trump hating Democrats not to deal with him. This level of undermining a sitting POTUS has to be unprecended in US history.
Steal it back.
Tillerson proclaimed himself and was know as a supporter of the Council on Foreign Relations views that are Holy Writ in the State Department. Seems like the President felt he couldn’t go far beyond the usual CFR/Goldman-Sachs crowd.
John Adams. Same thing happened to him. Abe Lincoln to a degree.
Lincoln was hated by the press also.
President Trump should have sent Tillerson to Iran for a meeting with the Iranian wackos, and fired him while he was in that meeting.
That would send a message.
Tillerson was a successful executive himself who has forgotten what it is to work for someone else and to promote and implement their policies and decisions.
In his days as a chief exec he would have unceremoniously canned anyone who did to him what he did to Trump so why would anyone expect something different from Trump?
Every decision like this that Trump makes is not completely ruled by political calculus. This is what has been lacking in presidents for a long time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.