Posted on 02/21/2018 10:03:25 AM PST by Red Badger
NASA's latest tower for launching rockets has a little bit of a lean, which means it may be able to launch just a single rocket. The cost of this tower boondoggle? Almost $1 billion.
The tower in question is the Mobile Launcher designed for NASA’s upcoming Space Launch System, which would become the world’s most powerful rocket once completed in a few years. The tower is supposed to keep the rocket stable and upright on the platform during a launch. The system was built for NASA’s now-defunct Ares I rocket and later repurposed for the SLS.
The Mobile Launcher is a behemoth piece of equipment, standing nearly 400 feet tall and weighing more than 10 million pounds. It holds miles of cables, tubes, and pipes to ensure the SLS can remain operational on the launch pad. Building such a structure is a challenging task, which is why it cost approximately $912 million.
The sheer size and complexity may also be the cause of the difficulties the Mobile Launcher is currently facing. According to a report from NASASpaceflight.com, the launch tower is leaning slightly toward the North, which is in the direction of the rocket on the launchpad. The structure also seems to be twisting slightly.
While NASA seems to believe this lean is not enough to require additional construction, it will likely mean that the Mobile Launcher won’t be used for more than one or two launches. If the agency wants to launch more than a few SLS rockets over the next few decades, it will likely have to build a brand new launcher.
This isn’t entirely a bad thing, though. NASA had previously been considering building a second launcher anyway to accommodate the SLS Exploration Upper Stage, the larger version of the rocket’s second stage designed to send payloads deeper into the solar system. Because the Exploration Upper Stage is much larger than the standard upper stage, it would require either significant updates to the existing Mobile Launcher or a brand new one.
The Exploration Upper Stage is scheduled to be used on the second flight of the SLS, which means that even if the leaning Mobile Launcher is structurally sound enough to launch multiple rockets, it may be retired after the first one anyway. After all, there was a strong argument in favor of building a new Mobile Launcher even before the old one started bending.
Source: NASASpaceflight.com
That was caused by Global Warming.
They need to call RamJack.
That’s the first picture of the Leaning Tower of Pisa I’ve seen that didn’t have somebody’s hand trying to hold it up.
Enough material there to build a horizontal rail and ramp launcher.
Seems they could sue the builder or designer.
I think the seed money for SpaceX was less than the cost of this defective rocket holder.
Is “gantry” too big a vocabulary word for Avery?
its called the Clinton
I think the problem is every bid to build the thing goes to the lowest bidder. :-(
This is such a dismissive, nothing to see here, article. Wouldn’t you think somebody should be held accountable for a very expensive mistake??
The Owner chose the site. The engineers probably asked how much do you want to spend for placing this on geologic subgrade that will become unstable once the weight of the structure is imposed.
It might be straight enough for any normal purpose but plumb enough for a ZZZZ pound rocket and the accompanying thrust in another matter — which is probably the issue here.
The Apollo program built a mobile launch platform that could carry a fully assembled Apollo stack from the vehicle assembly building out to the launch pad, including up an incline so that at the end, the launcher and rocket climbed eight stories up to the actial launch pad. It could do this without the tip of the rocket moving outside a circle the diameter of a tennis ball. Then it wss reused for the space shuttle. Made in the 1960s. With slide rules.
In the GOVERNMENT??????..........................
Without NASA, who is going to do muslim outreach?
I agree, wasn’t poor engineering it was a dumb spot to try to build it.
“This is such a dismissive, nothing to see here, article. Wouldn’t you think somebody should be held accountable for a very expensive mistake??”
Did anyone ever take any heat for Hubble’s crappy mirror?
The road was built for the Apollo program and continued to be used for the shuttle.
Without NASA, who is going to do muslim outreach?
$912 million? Less than the cost of 2 Solyndras. If it gets one launch, government will consider it a bargain. /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.