Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: GIdget2004
Of f-—ing course there is animus towards Islam. Is that now unConstitutional?? Puleez.
2 posted on
02/15/2018 8:58:29 AM PST by
bboop
(does not suffer fools gladly)
To: GIdget2004
Many of our federal judges are “tainted with animus towards Christianity.”
To: GIdget2004
A Virginia-based federal court of appeals on Thursday ruled the latest version of President Trumps travel ban unconstitutional citing that it unlawfully discriminates against Muslims.
I suppose a court that has already blown it’s reputation can make decisions like this.
4 posted on
02/15/2018 8:59:39 AM PST by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
To: GIdget2004
I though that the SCOTUS settled this in the president’s favor.
5 posted on
02/15/2018 8:59:48 AM PST by
KosmicKitty
(Opportunities multiply as they are seized.)
To: GIdget2004
The Supreme Court last month agreed to review the legality of Trump's travel ban and is expected in April to hear arguments regarding the order. 5-4? ..............
6 posted on
02/15/2018 9:00:20 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
To: GIdget2004
We are now a nation of men, not laws.
8 posted on
02/15/2018 9:01:34 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
To: GIdget2004
Well if you are from a country that is majority Muslim and that country has a record of their citizens supporting or committing acts of terror you should expect to get discriminated against by your potential victims. Too bad.
9 posted on
02/15/2018 9:01:55 AM PST by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: GIdget2004
Liberal morons in black robes who are simply apparatchiks of demon craps
Will lose badly
The 1954 decision by USSC is crystal clear
Until they can film flam take over again pres and plant some more buzzy Ginsberg or Sotomayor losers who will lie cheat steal for the demon rats
It’s over
I don’t see any way buzzy makes it through term 1 never mind term two of the TRUMP WINNING EXPRESS
10 posted on
02/15/2018 9:02:20 AM PST by
Truthoverpower
(The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
To: GIdget2004
I wonder what part of the Muslim declared jihad on the US these effing judges fail to understand. Like I have expressed before, we dont need a president, we have judges. My God!
To: GIdget2004
Why do we even have an executive branch?
12 posted on
02/15/2018 9:02:29 AM PST by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: GIdget2004
America was great while it lasted.
13 posted on
02/15/2018 9:02:33 AM PST by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
To: GIdget2004
Since when does the Constitution apply to aliens nor in this country?
16 posted on
02/15/2018 9:03:56 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: GIdget2004
Looks like what is perfectly OK, even though unconstitutional for a Dem is the standard that makes the perfectly constitutional by a Repub "just plain wrong and unconstitutional...
Those who crap on the Constitution think Trump is an un-Constitutional President.....ironic and funny in a sad way.
17 posted on
02/15/2018 9:04:11 AM PST by
trebb
(I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...;-})
To: GIdget2004
The “legislating by the bench” doesn’t nearly get enough outrage
Just sitting around and bitching about it isn’t enough
The Dimwitz have zero problem calling for the “impeachment” of a duly elected President, with absolutely ZERO evidence
Yet courts routinely overstep their bounds and not a peep from anyone. If there’s justification for impeachment, it’s with these bastards.
And you can start with Ruthie’s biased extra-judicial statements on policy and specifically on Trump, who’s Administration appears before her Court
18 posted on
02/15/2018 9:06:51 AM PST by
A_Former_Democrat
(Another Islamic terrorist event, and no “outrage” from the “Muslim community”. Again)
To: GIdget2004
Shut down ALL immigration from ALL countries for a year then revisit.
To: GIdget2004
More judges that need replacing. The SC will overturn this decision, as they should.
23 posted on
02/15/2018 9:10:39 AM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(The U.S. Senate - where American freedom goes to die.)
To: GIdget2004
Is the ‘extreme vetting’ available yet? This travel ban was supposed to be the short-term stop gap until that was put in place... which would render the entire argument moot.
25 posted on
02/15/2018 9:11:43 AM PST by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: GIdget2004
And another asinine lower court decision is off to SCOTUS to be properly overturned.
26 posted on
02/15/2018 9:11:49 AM PST by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
To: GIdget2004
Where does it say in the constitution that foreigners have a right to come to this country?
They should make the judges live with the incoming immigrants and you will see how quickly their attitudes change.
27 posted on
02/15/2018 9:13:32 AM PST by
seawolf101
(Member LES DEPLORABLES)
To: GIdget2004
There is no ‘rule of law’ when the judiciary itself is lawless.
28 posted on
02/15/2018 9:15:21 AM PST by
tomkat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson