Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I still think he was a good wartime president but other than that a one world government loser.


14 posted on 02/08/2018 10:07:32 AM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: antidemoncrat
Saddam wasn't bothering us. He was bothering other Mooslims. There was no downside to that.

The purpose of Dubya's Iraq invasion was to destabilize the Middle East and set the stage for importation of millions of "refugee children" into Western nations, overwhelm their cultures and establish the Davos-set's global government at last.


28 posted on 02/08/2018 10:19:04 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=400>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
I still think he was a good wartime president

Yeah, if you like that sort of thing. Except he went after the wrong country. He should have privately chastised and corrected Hussein.

He should have simply blown the Sowdies off the map on 9/12 and dusted his hands....no troop involvement.

29 posted on 02/08/2018 10:19:30 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

“I still think he was a good wartime president but other than that a one world government loser.”

He was good at getting us into war.


42 posted on 02/08/2018 10:28:46 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneoHeÂ’s suddenly vocal after 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
I still think he was a good wartime president but other than that a one world government loser.

That's pretty much my take as well. GWB has always been a one-world no-borders immigration nut, and he never hid that. He was no ideal choice but he was the choice the voters were given - that election was a perfect distillation of just how far the globalist establishment had succeeded in arranging a national election such that only its candidates were available. We were nearly given a similar choice in Hillary vs. Jeb. Heads I win, tails you lose.

I would not think that Dubya has a great deal of credibility when it comes to masterly intelligence analysis, though. That dog not only didn't hunt, it laid down on the porch, started wheezing, and died.

48 posted on 02/08/2018 10:36:54 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
I still think he was a good wartime president but other than that a one world government loser.

IMHO, the moment it became crystal clear that Bush was a shitty war time president came when he let Muqtada al-Sadr off the hook, indirectly and eventually enabling the Iranian mullahs. Like feral animals, feral countries should have offsetting natural enemies and idiot Bush took down Iran's natural enemy, giving the mideast another, more dangerous nuclear power. He was exactly what the dems said of him - stupid.

68 posted on 02/08/2018 11:21:26 AM PST by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Bush interfered in Iraq elections


99 posted on 02/08/2018 4:26:35 PM PST by Para-Ord.45 (Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson