Posted on 02/07/2018 7:34:58 AM PST by Liberty7732
Isn’t this what Mark Levin has been touting for years?
I’d like to see things get sorted out without going to this option. But I think you can’t count on anything and we should be preparing with this Plan B just in case.
Very interesting...
Another option is to water the tree of liberty.
And how does this get around a DOJ which is itself corrupted, part of the soft coup, and will not indict any of their allies in the attack on Trump.
It may be the only option, DC is so corrupt they installed an ineligible usurper and BOTH parties cooperated.
The Constitution was dead on Usurpation Day.
I thought it was called a Convention of States (COS).
This has been discussed, thoroughly, for years on this forum.
(Also, just curious as to why an author is never listed, in your posted articles, Liberty7732.)
You don’t need a special counsel for justice. You need to have an honest (and alive) AG who will get grand jury indictments against Traitorobama and the members of his kakistocracy for giving aid and comfort to the enemy. No plea bargaining. Try, convict, sentence, and publicly hang them. That will be justice.
The real interference and collusion and crimes were committed by Obama, Hillary and the FBI. Having an FBI guy, Mueller, investigate anything is a travesty and misses the mark, fox guarding hen house.
Since we see how the corrupt deep state is resisting, it may be the only option. I hate to think about it, but I think the corruption is so all encompassing, that if there is a better way to clean it up, I would like to know what it is.
One place the public can’t turn to apparently is the one agency that should be responsible....DOJ.
Thanks. I like your suggestion.
Didn’t Texas’ AG go after Barky, over several issues??
Here’s an interesting article (I know, it’s the lib Texas Tribune) on cases TX has filed against former 0 admin...along with the Win/Loss status.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/01/17/texas-federal-government-lawsuits/
But....if the AG’s of MANY (Repub) states would hold a convention.....hmmmm.
I learned a new word today. Thanks! d;^)
The corruption and scandals are so numerous, it would take an army
of investigators to work them.
The OIG staff of 500 is not large enough to do the work. Not even close.
First I heard of this word; made a note of it.
<>(Also, just curious as to why an author is never listed, in your posted articles, Liberty7732.)<>
Unless stated otherwise, I’m the author of my squibs. I also footnote my sources.
That is always an option.
Our revolution is among the few in which the victor, like our George Washington, didn’t replace one tyranny with another.
But, after almost all revolutions the winner legalizes his authority. So, if we watered the tree of liberty and won, we’d still have to come up with a written framework of government.
Rather than roll the dice in violence, we can peacefully, through Article V, correct the accumulated errors.
What if the FBI were disbanded as a federal agency, and replaced by a different organization that was populated by the states themselves? Each state would delegate a number of investigators to serve at the pleasure of their home state, and this body would become a federal investigative bureau.
As is with the militia, the Constitution provides for calling up the militias for national service, but the officers are selected by the states. It might not be a stretch to declare that state militias have investigators as a component, and then use the militia clause in the Constitution to call up the state militias' investigative arms for federal service, with state appointed officers.
Each state can create a branch of their militia as MPs, or detectives. These people would report to militia officers appointed within each state, and then these militia branches (officers and detectives) would be called up by the Commander-In-Chief to serve a national priority, under the authority of state officers, not federal bureaucrats. The state officers will report directly to the Commander-In-Chief.
This is all just top-of-mind, and I can use the help to flesh out this idea. How might it work? What are the barriers?
-PJ
Great column. While I support a COS regardless of the outcome of these scandals, I think a joint House/Senate committee, (just like the one for Richard Nixon) to investigate the high crimes of Obama and his people is the best way to go.
Wouldn’t it be sweet if Hillary was subjected to the same body that she worked on, and was subsequently fired from for her abject corruption?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.