Posted on 02/05/2018 7:13:59 AM PST by mac_truck
So time’s a-wasting.
Makes sense. That’s why big—fill in the industry—anything is bad, so we’ve heard from the leftists that hate capitalism for 60 years. Name your big— big auto, big oil, big Ag, big food supply, big transportation, big trucking, etc. maybe all mom pop business is the way to go, eh?
Low grade lymphoma is already quite treatment responsive.
Funny how the commies hate “big” everything EXCEPT Big Government.
Very true. And the difference is big government rules by force versus big business, can simply be avoided. I don’t buy products from liberal chi thole businesses.
Sounds wonderful!
>
Actually, it ain’t so much the FDA. The drug companies, and every other industry, are under threat from the lawyers and black-robed tyrants, both of which are licking their butts for the next billion dollar lawsuit. You have no idea the threats that drug companies face, it’s far worse than most people realize. The FDA has actually done a pretty fair job. If we had listened to Europe when they came out with thalidomide, the US would have 10s of thousands of seriously deformed children. Look up thalidomide babies. The FDA would not approve this drug without testing on primates.
>
Oh, I’ve contracted w/ a drug-producing co. in the past; I’ve seen their process(es)\paperwork.
It’s that, and the lawyers, plus public ignorance that keep R&D\drug $$ in the stratosphere.
As for thalidomide, like the CIA/FBI, I don’t call it a SUCCESS for the *one* it gets right...just luck. What stops ‘em from ‘approving’ the vice-versa (used across the world for 40yrs+)? MORE ‘human testing’?? Sorry, no, govt being govt should ALWAYS be minimal and watched like a hawk.
IMO, *ALL* drugs should available. Those that show promise become options based on usage and those willing to try ‘alternatives’ weed out the bad\ineffective.
Rx want to take the ‘slow route’ have that option.
I mean, we’re talking SYNTHETIC here (don’t believe Nature has a cure for EVERYTHING), and not ALL Rx are 100% effective\safe. Let the People decide just how much they are willing to do for a solution to what ails ‘em.
IF the FDA should even exist, constitutionally so, it should be in a ‘referral mode’ only...”This is what we SUGGEST (warning or for good)...”. Govt does not OWN our bodies.
They're testing something new to see if it works in human patients...low grade lymphoma is a logical starting point.
wow...thanks for the link!!!
no its not the same.
You need to increase the fat to protein and carb ratio.
too much protein will keep you out of ketosis. its basically the induction part of atkins but not the limited calories.
This guy is not a doctor- But he writes to a layman’s level, and does it very well in explaining Otto Warburg’s work, and Seifried’s book (which is not written to a layman’s level- but is available on Amazon).
Otto Warburg- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Heinrich_Warburg
So is it safe to allow my pet mouse to order that cell phone he’s been wanting?
It is not a vaccine, it is an immune modulator locally applied. Big difference. I guess the local application targets the immune response instead of an overall broad stimulation causing collapse of an greatly weakened immune system. The fact that non localized tumors respond is awsome.
I’ve seen this movie. It doesn’t end well.
BTTT for later.
NO waiting for terminal patients. There are several affordable cancer cures (Home remedies) that work. My friend killed her cancer following this.....
Budwig Protocol:
6 ounces cultured dairy (cottage cheese, goat’s milk kefir or amasai)
4 tablespoons sprouted and ground chia or flax
1 tablespoon flaxseed oil
1 teaspoon turmeric powder
1/4 teaspoon black pepper
Mix all the ingredients together in bowl or blender and consume once daily.
I’m not sure you got my point. Patents are monopolies. It doesn’t matter how much the drug treatments cost the drug companies. They will still charge whatever the market will bear. That’s how monopolies work. It’s the whole point of having one.
Thalidomide is but one glaring example out of 10s of thousands of others. Less than one in a hundred drugs is ever proven safe enough to reach the market place. If you ever worked in the area, you would know this. Is that ignorance?
I’ve worked on drug development projects for several companies over the years as a research veterinarian. Are you saying you have too? The process is meticulous and time consuming for a reason. Basically to verify safety and efficacy. Your statements make me question what you write? Life saving drugs are produced to help, not accidentally kill people, which would be the outcome if your suggested ignorant protocol was followed. Companies like Pfizer make a net profit of 12-14%, which is not unreasonable, and it is a company with millions of share holders. If you don’t like drug companies, then don’t use their products; the government is not forcing you to. But, companies are not in the welfare business nor do their top scientists wish to donate their time. Your statements come right off the leftist sites that demand everything be given to them for free— that’s not how it works in America.
True enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.