Report: 485 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Undermine Supposed ‘Consensus’ on Climate Change

Breitbart ^ | 10 Jan 2018 | THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A broad survey of climate change literature for 2017 reveals that the alleged “consensus” behind the dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine. Author Kenneth Richard found that during the course of the year 2017, at least 485 scientific papers were published that in some way questioned the supposed consensus regarding the perils of human CO2 emissions or the efficacy of climate models to predict the future.

According to Richard’s analysis, the 485 new papers underscore the “significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes,” which in turn suggests that climate science is not nearly as settled as media reports and some policymakers would have people believe.

Richard broke the skeptical positions into four main categories, with each of the individual papers expounding at least one of these positions, and sometimes more.

[Yashcheritsiy]

Obviously these weren’t *real* scientists

/s

[lodi90]

Both the BBC and Sky News are hysterical climate alarmists. You might as well call them the Polar Bear channel.

[thulldud]

Aye, laddie, but d’ye ken how mony were *real* Scotsmen, forbye?

[Red Badger]

The ‘science’ is ‘settled’...........Algore said so..................

[Leep]

You forgot...”is a con man” at the end of your Sentence.

[BitWielder1]

Well there was a consensus that there was a consensus.
Apparently that was a lie too.

[publius911]

Report: 485 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Undermine Supposed ‘Consensus’ on Climate Change

Real science is finally persuading normal people, who outnumber the moonbats, I hope.

[butlerweave]

Climate Change takes 100,000 years + ,but toady it can take 2 months ,LOL

[chiller]

That 97 % figure we hear so often, is basically based upon responses sent to only those who agree .....which means 3% of those who once agreed, no longer agree LOL

[BenLurkin]

The last ice age ended swiftly.

[chiller]

and furthermore.....old data has been proven to be changed to show warming, and that manipulated data shows "warmest year ever" results by tiny, miniscule, thousandthss-of-percentiles (.001), with margins of error hundreds of times larger (.01).

There had never been a greater fraud, until deep state went after DjT.

[Bob434]

[[Author Kenneth Richard]]

A small voice amidst the shrieking masses- Won’t go anywhere unfortunately— The liberal world has made up it’s mind- man is to blame despite evidence to the contrary - they constitute the ‘new truth’ unfortunately, and the lemmings follow them blindly

We wish you luck Ken- Your job is monumental-

[Jacquerie]

This crapola screams for a statistical analysis of the correlation between science climate scientists who blame civilization for climate change and government funding of their research.

[Amendment10]

”… is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine have been indoctrinated by the MSM to believe."

There! Fixed it.