Just go to the re-education camp instead.
Posted on 01/09/2018 4:29:24 PM PST by RightGeek
Singer Ginuwine has sparked a heated debate on Twitter after a recent episode of Celebrity Big Brother UK. In the latest episode, Ginuwine seemingly rejected fellow housemate India Willoughby.
The controversy stems from a conversation between Willoughby and the “Pony” singer, in which she asked whether he would date a trans woman. “You would date me, yeah,” Willoughby, who is a trans woman herself, asked. “Not if you were trans,” Ginuwine replied. After Ginuwine replied that he would not date a trans woman, Willoughby attempted to plant a kiss on the singer. When her advance was rejected, Willoughby stormed off.
Now Twitter has split into two sides. One side is outraged by Ginuwine’s rejection, suggesting that his unwillingness to date trans women is transphobic and bigoted. On the other hand, some fans are rallying behind the “In Those Jeans” artist, insisting that he has a choice to date whomever he chooses. Some also suggested that Willoughby was actually harassing him.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at bet.com ...
Is that a rhetorical question?
I never heard of any of these critters and would undoubtedly take extreme measures to avoid their sound pollution but I have to give some respect to the one called Ginuwine.
Considering all the current #MeToo frenzy, I thought that Leotards are supposed to be clear that unwanted physical affection is unacceptable.
No, as usual, specially designated groups are to enjoy different rules than the rest of us.
#metoo Isn’t this sexual assault by bullying?
That was supposed to say “Leftards” not “Leotards.” Silly auto-correct!
So some people have the right to publicly sexually assault others. And if you don’t publicly submit to the assault you’re a bigot.
Black Entertainment Television sort of tends to do these kinds of things. Black people are doused, prepped, encouraged to follow the rappers culture, and have little use for logic, reason or common sense. It does sell, and goes well with a drug culture.
And yet if a REAL man had tried to force a kiss on a woman... would not the outcry be sexual harassment?
One set of rules for thee... another for me...
Our world has become a parody of itself.
[ Has everyone gone insane? ]
Just those who supported and still support Barack Trans Obama in 2008, 2012 and STILL do.
I don’t don’t if there are too many lies much bigger than “trans-man” or “trans-woman”. There is no such thing. Maybe a freak of nature here or there but overwhelmingly, no.
And yet there are idiots which call this insanity “civil rights” and march alongside Michael Michelle and Gay Barack.
SMH
I thought unwelcomed kissing was sexual harassment. When is one required to allow it? Do we get a rule book?
Just go to the re-education camp instead.
“Has everyone gone insane?”
Only the transgender proponents who believe everyone else is either a bigot or crazy unless they buy into the lunacy.
“Trans Woman” So it’s a guy who thinks he’s a woman?
We live in bizarro world after 8 years of the Kenyan.
How IS THIS NOT HARASSEMENT?!!!!
I'm getting too old to think about how fast I could cure these problems with an axe handle. Even faster with a company of Marines.
Yes, next.
I don’t know the show or the people but I had this discussion with a trans friendly heterosexual male liberal. He admits he would not be attracted to a trans woman with a penis.
If everyone should be able to “love whom they want,” which was a goal of the gay agenda, then you can also choose to not love whom you don’t want to love.
If it would be wrong for a heterosexual man to choose NOT to have sex with a girl with a d*ck, then it by logic would be wrong for a gay man NOT to have sex with a straight woman. You can’t have it both ways.
Romans 1:26-28 King James Version
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.