Posted on 01/03/2018 1:13:11 PM PST by walford
Edited on 01/03/2018 2:32:01 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
According to Time, all men are inevitably angry. The only way to stem this drastic tide of angry men is to raise them as follows: "At a young age, this should be done explicitly, in organized forums for discussions at school," Faith Salie writes. "It must be done relentlessly and organically, in our family homes. Parents must invite their sons to be sad, afraid, hurt, silly and affectionate, and must embrace them as often as they snuggle their daughters. Sweet boys learn early on that they can defend themselves against loneliness by reaching out and asking for support rather than turning into people who, literally, grab for power. Sweet boys evolve into open-hearted men who arent confused about consent and sexual boundaries, because they experience women as equals."
This, of course, implies that parents of boys naturally tend to push them away and train them to act more like Spartans preparing for perpetual warfare than, well, the children they are. Girls, on the other hand, can be as fierce as they like. And if fierce requires Spartan parenting skills, I guess that means girls should be, what? Hugged less? Shown Beyonce videos on a repeating track beginning at birth?
Salie exhibits the kind of feminism that held women back in 2017. This was the year in which what was once a powerful cultural movement against gross gender-based inequalities fully pandered to the outrage of its rulers, a minority class of rich, white women with no real problems and plenty of time to kill. Although 2017 is ending with the image of an Iranian woman boldly removing her hijab in a public square, it will forever be defined by the image of American WASPs marching on D.C. in pussyhats. Such is the legacy of a movement defined by women too rich to do any real work and too sheltered to ever experience true suffering.
Hence, the biggest battle in the mind of the American feminist is the one being waged against angry men. Forget the fact that for every Harvey Weinstein there is a Chip Gaines or a Linda Sarsour for that matter. In the mind of the American feminist the true battle is being waged, as Salie suggests, in kids clothing stores across America:
Walk into any baby store, and youre greeted immediately in the boys department by brown and neon green layettes festooned with sharks, trucks, and footballs. Onesies for newborns declare, TOUGH LIKE DADDY. The boy taught from infancy to be tough is emotionally doomed... The clothes marketed to my daughter feature unicorns, rainbows, rockets, dinosaurs, and sequins in every color imaginable. They are whimsical and sparkly.
Permit me to get truly feminist for a moment and suggest that even the mythical powers of the unicorn are phallic, as is the fencing foil Salies daughter crafts out of a kite. But, if a girl is in charge of the pointed object in question its perfectly okay. Salie isnt arguing in favor of gender equality; shes arguing in favor of stripping all men of their sense of an autonomous self. According to Salie, it isnt the man himself, but the man who holds a position any position -- of authority that is truly evil.
Dont let Salies thinly veiled call for (male) empathy fool you. There is no room in her movement for empathy for girls who are forced to defend themselves against the persecution of Islamic clerics, forced genital mutilation, or sex slavery. American feminists dont talk about having empathy for those women. They simply hashtag them and move on to fight the real battles taking place in select Carters and Childrens Place stores all over the country: the battle over whose logo t-shirt is truly the toughest.
2017 isnt just the year feminism failed women. It is the year feminism failed men. Even more sadly, it is the year feminism encouraged mothers to fail their boys. Raising a child should never involve stripping him of his independence, let alone holding him up to a standard rooted in stereotypes. But, I suppose thats what happens when you bind yourself to a movement so limited in scope and function that your pussyhat blinds you from looking past the end of your silver spoonor Target receipt.
Fixed it.
‘Parents must invite their sons to be sad, afraid, hurt, silly and affectionate, and must embrace them as often as they snuggle their daughters.’
in other words, we should turn them into PAC 12 football players...
“Feminists want to turn boys into men even they wouldnt want.”
in other words, we should turn them into PAC 12 football players...
Who then get drafted by the Green Bay Packers; where they stand around, claim to be hurt, and make State Farm commercials.
A boy trained to be a pussy will be raped and plundered by age 10. He will grow into a wimpy, sissified, angry queer with homicidal instincts.
all men are inevitably angry.
That really pisses me off!!!
“Western Europe is full of sweet boys, which is why their nations are overrun by Muslims and the women cant walk in safety without fearing rape or worse.”
Western Europe has no will to survive, much less thrive.
‘That aint all they will be defending themselves against.’
yeah, ask Rich Rodriguez...
I suppose the next thing they will try is euthanasia for little boys.
More and more young men are Muslims or macho Latinos today; the feminists missed their chance. Now they’ll deal with males who will either slap them around (if they’re lucky) or cut off their heads (if they aren’t).
>>Sweet boys evolve into open-hearted men who arent confused about consent and sexual boundaries, because they experience women as equals.”
So they grow up to be cucks who watch women run off with men who are still men. Fortunately for these sweet boys, there is porn and drugs and XBox.
I suspect the opposite has been here for some time; when I was younger (decades ago) my classrooms were 3:2 in favor of boys, and now my I see the same with my kids’ classes.
India tried to outlaw gender-selective abortion, but it failed; wealthy people could bribe the doctor, while poorer people literally would throw female babies in the gutter.
Ideas have consequences, and it doesn’t look good for Western women; once breeding isn’t the goal, they can’t replace men in most roles.
ha ha ha...
They should be raising both boys AND girls to survive in the the real world!
This is part of the reason why I homeschooled both of my boys when they were younger. I didn’t want them exposed to this crap.
I’m going to throw up after reading the first three sentences......
“More and more young men are Muslims or macho Latinos today; the feminists missed their chance. Now theyll deal with males who will either slap them around (if theyre lucky) or cut off their heads (if they arent).”
“in other words, we should turn them into PAC 12 football players...
Who then get drafted by the Green Bay Packers; where they stand around, claim to be hurt, and make State Farm commercials.”
I haven’t stopped laughing at this yet.
Odd, isn’t it?
Hmm, I don’t know about that. My husband is Irish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.