The First Anti-American President

PJ Media ^ | December 28, 2017 | Michael Ledeen

[Kaslin]

Barack Obama will no doubt be chronicled, among other things, as the first anti-American president. No wonder; he’s the product of an educational system that has become increasingly radical and anti-American with each passing decade, and his mother was a stereotypical leftist anthropologist with a passion for the Third World.

The pattern is unmistakable. As Luis Fleischman notes, Obama wanted to make deals with our enemies, Iran being the most dramatic example. But just look at Latin America:

The Obama Administration tried to avoid confrontations with anyone it wanted to make a “historic deal” with. Most of these “historic deals” were intended to be made with enemies, as Obama desperately sought an agreement not only with Iran, but also with Cuba and reconciliation with Venezuela.

Thus, Obama failed to insist on the extradition of Venezuelan military and drug trafficker Hugo Carvajal from Aruba and the Syrian-born Venezuelan drug lord Walid Makled from Colombia. Carvajal was the chief of Venezuelan military intelligence and Makled is one of the most notorious drug traffickers in the Western Hemisphere. Makled himself disclosed his own cooperation with scores of the highest officials within Chavez’s government -- including Carvajal himself, with the chiefs of the Venezuelan army and navy, as well as with dozens of Venezuelan generals.

The Obama people did not want to know the details of Venezuela’s collusion with the drug Mafiosi. If you have followed the story of the obstruction of the DEA investigation of Hezbollah, you will recognize the pattern. Indeed, it is part of the story.

It is also part of a bigger story: What is Trump going to do about Iran? The rhetoric on Iran is great. Inspirational, even. But as even “Mad Dog" Mattis says, there’s, well, more rhetoric, along with some sanctions:

U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis says Washington will deal with Iran through a "diplomatically-led effort," a day after a top U.S. diplomat said Tehran was supplying weapons to the Huthi rebels in Yemen.

So we still don’t have an Iran policy worthy of the name, despite the welcome clarity the Trump people have brought to the subject. “Everywhere you find turmoil,” Mattis said following our UN Ambassador Nikki Haley’s expose of Iran’s role in Yemen, “you find Iran’s hand in it.”

But then the secretary of Defense went on to embrace consciousness-raising.

Consciousness has long been suitably raised. There is no confusion about the nature of the Iranian regime or its intent to develop nuclear attack weapons or its savage repression of seventy-plus million people who would undoubtedly enter the ranks of the West if they could. But if we do not directly challenge the regime, no one else is going to do it.

Donald Trump is certainly the opposite of an anti-American president, and he has no affection for our enemies. He has enabled the Ukrainians to fight, perhaps effectively, against the Russians. So why can’t he enable the Iranians to fight against the ayatollahs?

In the Ukrainian case we’re talking about military weapons; in the Iranian conflict the weapons are political. If the Iranians rose up against the regime when Obama entered the White House, you can be sure they are at least equally motivated to do it with Trump in office. There are many protests in Iran today, and the Khamenei/Rouhani regime has responded by executing half as many Iranians as in the past. We should relentlessly expose this mass murder, and we should publicize the ongoing protests.

The target audience for such exposes is the great mass of the population. Paradoxically, Iranians are better informed about events in Jerusalem and Washington than in Iranian Kurdistan, the southern oil regions, and cities like Mashad and Qom.

All Iranians need this information, which shows them that they are not alone. The technology for such a campaign exists. It is the same as it was when we deployed it against the Soviet Union with such powerful consequences: our broadcasting network, starting with the Voice of America. Today, Farsi-language VOA is often a vehicle for anti-American polemics, since personnel is virtually unchanged from the Obama years. We need a thorough housecleaning, but there are few signs that our national security team understands its urgency.

Faster, please.

[grey_whiskers]

[DakotaGator]

Great to see you, wita! Happy New Year!!

[Candor7]

Barack Obama will no doubt be chronicled, among other things, as the first anti-American president. >>>>>>>>

Obama tried to comnvert America from a dynamic melting pot dedicated to freedom and liberty to a balkanized nation organized as a collective of racial and ethnic minorities who were to control the nation. Whites, and Asians were to be relegated to second class citizenship of the no longer “privileged.” Many of Obama’s followers are still at it, as well as Obama himself.They all need to be destroyed and relegated to the dust bin of history.

Obama was and is a liberal fascist. That’s how history will remember him:

Great Read:

Barrack Obama: The Quintessential Liberal Fascist.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html

[MV=PY]

"I don’t really think he cares. He was not a successful president doubling our debt, raising unemployment, destroying our relations with many of our allies, empowering our enemies, and trying to do damage to a system of government and country that has been the most successful in the history of man and the one that hundreds of thousands of people are trying to get to to include those that will gamble their lives doing it on cardboard boats in open ocean."

I don't think he cares either.

It's a good thing that he was largely lazy and ineffective. If he was driven he could have done far more damage.

[Redwood71]

“I don’t think he cares either.”

Trump is aware of what’s happening out there. And he has made the effort to let them run their own countries unless it is an ally and they are in peril. But that’s why we have diplomats in those countries and not protectors.

Oh, we have troops in some. We’ve had them for a long time and Trump was dealt that hand. But by sending in teachers rather than combat military, he trying to settle them without lives going. But he is capable if he has to. And he knows it will be his decision, not the UN, not NATO, and not the press. And they know it, too.

rwood