Posted on 12/28/2017 2:35:32 PM PST by Maceman
A biology professor from San Jose State University recently argued in several tweets that chromosomes dont determine sex.
The tweets were written in response to Texas State Representative Briscoe Cain, who had tweeted a picture of the XX and XY chromosomes as reminder of "how many genders there are."
A San Jose State University biology professor recently accused a Texas state legislator of being bigoted for tweeting that there are only two genders.
In case you forgot how many genders there are, Republican State Representative Briscoe Cain tweeted on December 21, attaching a picture of the XX and XY chromosomes.
"One thing I am not doing is arguing with someone whose basic premise is incorrect and tries to tell me that they know more about my science, in which I am an expert, than I do."
Describing herself as a geneticist, Rachael French replied to the tweet with an extended harangue in which she impugned Cains motives and derided his understanding of biology.
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
Yet another reason to never listen to anyone from the third rate community college known as San Jose State.
Lots of their hapless, helpless, Engrish-as-a-Third-Language graduates doin’ time in the bowels of the Silicon Slum, doing the grunt work that people with an actual education don’t have any interest in doing.
About Rachael L. French
I am an associate professor at San José State University with a research program focusing on an invertebrate genetic model of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.
In addition, since 2009 I have been working as a freelance editor for Aplia, Inc., a textbook publishing company in Belmont, California. I serve as a reviewer of problem sets for the Biology project, using my expertise as a geneticist, behavioral scientist, neuroscientist, and my broad-based knowledge of biology to determine the quality and scientific accuracy of the problems produced and to suggest improvements.
Its not bigoted to sternly oppose idiots. In fact it is noble if you are able to purge them from any position of influence.
She studies the sexual habit of fruit flies!!! Duh... She must be having a brain fart as genes contain DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). DNA is the chemical basis of heredity. Think of it this way: DNA is in genes, genes are on chromosomes.
Here is part of the abstract of one of her pub’s
Abstract
Over the past 35 years, developmental geneticists have made impressive progress toward an understanding of how genes specify morphology and function, particularly as they relate to the specification of each physical component of an organism. In the last 20 years, male courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as a robust model system for the study of genetic specification of behavior. Courtship behavior is both complex and innate, and a single gene, fruitless (fru), is both necessary and sufficient for all aspects of the courtship ritual.
Typically, loss of male-specific Fruitless protein function results in male flies that perform the courtship ritual incorrectly, slowly, or not at all. Here we describe a novel requirement for fru: we have identified a group of cells in which male Fru proteins are required to reduce the speed of courtship initiation. In addition, we have identified a gene, which is required in these cells for normal courtship and mating behavior.
***************************************************
Yes, much more than most realize. This whole "you can determine your own gender" is pure Lysenkoism. In fact, everything around this made-up gender nonsense is so close to the crackpot theories of Trofim Lysenko is proof that there is indeed nothing new under the sun.
‘OH how, how did I just know the so called prof was a woman.’
same way I knew; who else but an elite feminist would make such a stupid statement...?
This is what happens when you can’t apply your extensive knowledge to save your life.
Yes, at the genetic level, there is a whole lot of complex interactions and all sorts of improbable but possible edge cases that don’t fit the “male” and “female” buckets that nearly everyone else in the world who has ever been born fits into just fine.
But nearly everyone who has ever been born fits into one of these two buckets and the determinative factor is the very well understood XX or XY. If the biology professor feels differently so strongly, she shouldn’t argue with a headstrong Texas legislator who probably lacks the education to succinctly rebut her position, she should argue with every obstetrician and nurse midwife who has ever read a genetic test result and told an expectant parent their baby is going to be either a boy or a girl.
Per her own Journal article:
“In addition, we have identified a gene, which is required in these cells for normal courtship and mating behavior.”
My reply... DNA is in genes, genes are on chromosomes.
‘There are three genders: masculine, feminine and neutral.’
masculine, feminine, and neuter...neutral is a position on a gearshift...
I don’t know that “thinker.” Thanks for mentioning him. I’ll have to investigate him. I was thinking of their bogus psychiatry and scientific stuff.
Of course, once the revolution was completed, all sexual innovation was snuffed out. Same with the Nazis.
Well, I think the professor is pulling the science out of............well, you know.
Darn that autocorrect. Darn it to heck!
Seems like everyday these “professors” are coming out with the stupidest things. Must not take much academics to be a “professor” these days. Wonder if anyone even checks their credentials to make sure they actually went to school, before hiring them. Idiot.
Since dancing is a part of the courtship ritual in many species, is there a dancing gene?
‘Must not take much academics to be a professor these days.’
what it takes is the ability to compose jargon dominated studies, and the connections to get those studies published...sad, really...
Some orifice that he probably also claims is a sex organ although biologically it isn’t.
She’s a supposed “biologist” for whom pop-psychology and a social-political has priority over biological science.
Like all the “gender” political activists, she, for political reasons attempts to promote a tiny fraction of exceptions as the norm and to be treated as the norm, so much that anyone with a mental obsession can claim the status that in reality only a tiny fraction of biologically ABNORMAL situations can claim [like hermaphrodites - 1) true hermaphrodite an infant born with both ovaries and testicles and has both male and female sex organs. 2) female pseudohermaphrodite a genetic female with male external sex organs; 3) male pseudohermaphrodite a genetic male with external sex organs that fail to develop properly, resulting in female or male/female physical characteristics].
The descriptive word for this is called scientism . It's what snake oil salesmen used to push their "cure-all" elixirs at a premium price.
‘rats love science - until it gets in the way of their ideologies......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.