Posted on 12/10/2017 11:29:55 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
Yeah, not to get your blood pressures to spike over the weekend, but some on the feminist Left just need to accept that 2016 happened and they lost. It doesnt matter that Hillary Clinton got more popular votes either; thats not how you win the presidency. We all know this. Now, as we enter the 2018 midterm season, we still have some who just cant stand that Trump won, that hes president, and that Hillary Clinton will never be presidentever. Enter Gloria Steinem who says she doesnt think Trump is president because he lost by 10 million votes. No, he didnt (via New England Cable News):
Hundreds of women and men came to the opening night of the Massachusetts Conference for Women to hear Gloria Steinem speak. The feminist icon told the crowd Wednesday that sexual harassment is about power, not sex, and she said women are gaining their voices in a way that's never happened before. The 83-year-old didn't not mince words on power and politics. On the national conversation about sexual misconduct, she pointed to the top. "He's not the president," Steinem said of Donald Trump. "He lost by 10 million votes. I never called him president once, he's the harasser-in-chief and part of the reason, at this point, people are so frustrated." Again, thats not how we decide the president, Ms. Steinem. Trump had a decisive 304-227 Electoral College victory over Hillary. Thats why hes president. The willful ignorance of ignoring this aspect of the Constitution just shows you how liberals just make up the rules and move the goal posts when things dont go their way. Its their hallmark characteristic. Also, by people, you mean liberals right, Gloria?
Yet, its par for the course for Steinem and her ilk. Our gal couldnt hack it, so no one really won or something. Indeed, I can understand the anger; this was one of the most winnable elections for Democrats, who blew it when they nominated Lady Macbeth to be their standard bearer. The Left shouldnt be angry at Trump for winning, they should be more infuriated with Hillary for losing. She could have won this election if she had an economic agenda and political skill. She had neither. Some things cant be fixed, but there certainly were other areas that she could have improved on to better her chances, like campaigning aggressively in the Rust Belt.
For that (adding it to the discussion) & that alone I hope. 8>)
In her dreams.
She clearly does not understand how a representative republic works.
They keep opening their mouths and removing all doubt.
No wonder why people are using the phrase fake news. The Establishment Media is mostly in New York City and Los Angeles, and they might as well be living as denizens of the fictional capital of Panem (if you've read the novel The Hunger Games, you know what I mean).
3,000.000 votes of illegal aliens in kalifornia
I heard it was 100 million votes. Yeah, that was it. 200 million votes Trump lost by!
Yeah Gloria, Dear, Our Presidential elections are determined by the electoral college as written in the US Constitution.
But that, darling, is irrelevant, as your pals in the Dhimmicrat party, ability to cheat on elections has probably doubled any number you can tell me Hitlery won the popular vote by.
Reeking of pot smoke and patchouli oil like most aging hippies.
CC
I don't believe that's entirely accurate. The more appearances she made, the more public her campaign, the less people liked her. More exposure for Hillary made her negatives climb. To paraphrase Keith Jackson, people just plain didn't like her.
As for Steinem, who cares what that addled old harpy has to say?
Want a good source. Try 55 Men and the Constitution...Rodell. (Hope that's right) Memory going.
Mark Steyn on Gloria Steinem and Bill Clinton:
Or define ‘feminists’ by ‘shoes owned’ rather than the ‘current snowflake definition’....
How about that Gloria Steinem? Can we be as stupid as you are?
Gloria Steinem passed her expiration date in the 80s.
Poor Gloria. Reality escapes her.
Barbie say, "Gloria, math is hard!!"
“Let’s not fool ourselves. “I believe Juanita” doesn’t just mean that you’re generally in favor of believing women when they report sex crimes. It means you believe that for eight years our country was in the hands of a violent rapist.”
https://www.steynonline.com/8309/a-guide-to-pants-dropping-for-the-new-man
How about it Gloria Steinem... did YOU Gloria enable a rapist - pushing to keep him in office? Oh, and the new definition of ‘feminists’ is dumb. Let me redefine it - it’s women who backed a rapist in exchange for ‘KILL THE BABY KILL THE BABY KILL THE BABY LET US KILL THE BABY’ LEGISLATION... Because with liberal sexual predators THE most important legislation is abortion. You think Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton wanted little versions of themselves mucking up their lives?
A poster that connects the dots Gloria:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQiTZrdVAAEXwaB.jpg
So, how is Hillary’s presidency going, Gloria? I haven’t heard much about it.
What a nasty dried up old whore!
She is so full of poisonous hatred, I hope she dies from her own poison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.